DBOEF
Price
$296.49
Change
+$5.54 (+1.90%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
54.54B
MCO
Price
$509.43
Change
-$0.64 (-0.13%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
91.37B
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DBOEF vs MCO

Header iconDBOEF vs MCO Comparison
Open Charts DBOEF vs MCOBanner chart's image
Deutsche Boerse AG
Price$296.49
Change+$5.54 (+1.90%)
Volume$32
Capitalization54.54B
Moody's
Price$509.43
Change-$0.64 (-0.13%)
Volume$506.88K
Capitalization91.37B
DBOEF vs MCO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DBOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DBOEF vs. MCO commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBOEF is a StrongBuy and MCO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (DBOEF: $296.48 vs. MCO: $509.43)
Brand notoriety: DBOEF and MCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DBOEF: 32% vs. MCO: 70%
Market capitalization -- DBOEF: $54.54B vs. MCO: $91.37B
DBOEF [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $54.54B. MCO’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $91.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $167.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DBOEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DBOEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCO is a better buy in the long-term than DBOEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DBOEF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DBOEF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MCO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DBOEF is a better buy in the short-term than MCO.

Price Growth

DBOEF (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +0.91% price change this week, while MCO (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -0.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+1.32% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCO($91.4B) has a higher market cap than DBOEF($54.5B). MCO has higher P/E ratio than DBOEF: MCO (43.32) vs DBOEF (23.63). DBOEF YTD gains are higher at: 25.486 vs. MCO (8.223). MCO (3.59B) and DBOEF (3.5B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . DBOEF has more cash in the bank: 217B vs. MCO (2.29B). MCO (7.31B) and DBOEF (7.23B) have equivalent revenues.
DBOEFMCODBOEF / MCO
Capitalization54.5B91.4B60%
EBITDA3.5B3.59B98%
Gain YTD25.4868.223310%
P/E Ratio23.6343.3255%
Revenue7.23B7.31B99%
Total Cash217B2.29B9,476%
Total DebtN/A7.28B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DBOEF vs MCO: Fundamental Ratings
DBOEF
MCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2279
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2031
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DBOEF's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (87) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that DBOEF’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

DBOEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (31) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that DBOEF’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

DBOEF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (100) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that DBOEF’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as DBOEF (54) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to DBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as DBOEF (100) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to DBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBOEFMCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DBOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IYZ31.550.29
+0.93%
iShares US Telecommunications ETF
GJH9.370.05
+0.54%
Synthetic Fixed-Income Sec STRATS 2004-06
INRO30.650.12
+0.41%
iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Act ETF
FIAX18.15N/A
+0.01%
Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF
SPSB30.24-0.01
-0.03%
SPDR® Portfolio Short Term Corp Bd ETF

DBOEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBOEF has been loosely correlated with DBOEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DBOEF jumps, then DBOEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBOEF
1D Price
Change %
DBOEF100%
+1.91%
DBOEY - DBOEF
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
LNSTY - DBOEF
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
SPGI - DBOEF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
MCO - DBOEF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
LDNXF - DBOEF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
More

MCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCO
1D Price
Change %
MCO100%
-0.13%
SPGI - MCO
88%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
NDAQ - MCO
77%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
MORN - MCO
74%
Closely correlated
-1.47%
TRU - MCO
73%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
MSCI - MCO
67%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
More