Advertisement
DFNS vs MRCY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFNS is a Hold and MRCY is a Hold.
| DFNS | MRCY | DFNS / MRCY | |
| Capitalization | 9.69M | 4.85B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -138.36M | 73.4M | -188% |
| Gain YTD | -98.096 | 10.410 | -942% |
| P/E Ratio | 0.05 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 7.65M | 984M | 1% |
| Total Cash | 7.01M | 214M | 3% |
| Total Debt | 14.6M | 488M | 3% |
DFNS | MRCY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 63 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DFNS's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRCY (98) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that DFNS’s stock grew significantly faster than MRCY’s over the last 12 months.
MRCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DFNS (100) in the null industry. This means that MRCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DFNS’s over the last 12 months.
MRCY's SMR Rating (91) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as DFNS (100) in the null industry. This means that MRCY’s stock grew similarly to DFNS’s over the last 12 months.
MRCY's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DFNS (98) in the null industry. This means that MRCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DFNS’s over the last 12 months.
MRCY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is significantly better than the same rating for DFNS (74) in the null industry. This means that MRCY’s stock grew significantly faster than DFNS’s over the last 12 months.
| DFNS | MRCY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 69% | 17 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 77% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DFNS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MRCY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DFNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MRCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DFNS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRCY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DFNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MRCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
DFNS (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -6.35% price change this week, while MRCY (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -2.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
DFNS is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2026.
MRCY is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aerospace & Defense (-3.11% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SPTM | 92.55 | 0.74 | +0.81% |
| State StreetSPDRPortS&P1500CompStkMktETF | |||
| AGQI | 18.54 | 0.12 | +0.66% |
| First Trust Active Gbl Qual Inc ETF | |||
| FICS | 41.23 | 0.14 | +0.33% |
| First Trust Intl Developed Cap Strth ETF | |||
| TBLD | 21.38 | 0.05 | +0.25% |
| Thornburg Income Builder Opportunities Trust | |||
| KDVD | 28.75 | N/A | N/A |
| Keeley Dividend ETF | |||
DFNS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DFNS and PRZO have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DFNS and PRZO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFNS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFNS | 100% | -2.54% | ||
| PRZO - DFNS | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.60% | ||
| HOVR - DFNS | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.47% | ||
| BYRN - DFNS | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.55% | ||
| MRCY - DFNS | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
| LUNR - DFNS | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.85% | ||
More | ||||