It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DHT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINSW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DHT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INSW’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
DHT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -1.86% price change this week, while INSW (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -6.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.04%.
DHT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
INSW is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
DHT | INSW | DHT / INSW | |
Capitalization | 1.9B | 2.6B | 73% |
EBITDA | 304M | 755M | 40% |
Gain YTD | -0.211 | -19.309 | 1% |
P/E Ratio | 11.88 | 4.82 | 247% |
Revenue | 561M | 1.07B | 52% |
Total Cash | 74.7M | 187M | 40% |
Total Debt | 430M | 745M | 58% |
DHT | INSW | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 89 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INSW's Valuation (4) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as DHT (5). This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to DHT’s over the last 12 months.
DHT's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as INSW (53). This means that DHT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's SMR Rating (33) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as DHT (54). This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to DHT’s over the last 12 months.
DHT's Price Growth Rating (80) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as INSW (89). This means that DHT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.
DHT's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as INSW (83). This means that DHT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.
DHT | INSW | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago78% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago60% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | 6 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago73% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
MMIJX | 22.66 | 0.27 | +1.21% |
Victory Integrity Mid-Cap Value Member | |||
JCPRX | 21.64 | 0.25 | +1.17% |
JPMorgan US Large Cap Core Plus R5 | |||
ALCKX | 98.58 | 0.97 | +0.99% |
AB Large Cap Growth K | |||
GSCTX | 13.13 | 0.11 | +0.84% |
Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts C | |||
TNVDX | 10.26 | 0.03 | +0.29% |
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income I |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DHT has been closely correlated with FRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DHT jumps, then FRO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DHT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DHT | 100% | +0.67% | ||
FRO - DHT | 83% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
INSW - DHT | 79% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
TNK - DHT | 74% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
STNG - DHT | 67% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
TRMD - DHT | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
More |