DHT
Price
$18.57
Change
+$0.02 (+0.11%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.99B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
INSW
Price
$96.18
Change
+$0.97 (+1.02%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
4.76B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DHT vs INSW

DHT vs INSW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 26, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? DHT Holdings (DHT) vs. International Seaways (INSW) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • DHT operates a focused fleet of VLCCs (Very Large Crude Carriers, the largest class of crude oil tankers), while INSW runs a diversified fleet spanning both crude tankers and product carriers across multiple vessel classes.
  • INSW has significantly outperformed DHT on a year-to-date basis, with gains exceeding 100% compared to DHT's roughly 50% advance, reflecting stronger market sentiment and broader operational leverage.
  • Both companies are executing aggressive fleet renewal programs — DHT through four VLCC newbuildings and older vessel sales, INSW through six LR1 (Long Range 1) newbuildings plus the strategic consolidation of Tankers International.
  • DHT offers a substantially higher dividend yield backed by a 100% payout policy on ordinary net income, while INSW has shifted toward a 75%–87% payout ratio supplemented by share repurchases.
  • Spot tanker rates have strengthened markedly in recent months, with VLCC rates reaching levels roughly double those of the prior-year period, benefiting both companies but amplifying INSW's multi-segment earnings power.
  • Both stocks carry analyst Buy ratings and trade at single-digit P/E (Price-to-Earnings) ratios, suggesting the market continues to price in cyclical uncertainty despite robust current cash flows.

Introduction

Investors evaluating the marine shipping and energy transportation sector frequently encounter two prominent names: DHT Holdings and International Seaways. Both are publicly traded tanker companies that generate revenue by moving crude oil and petroleum products across international waters, yet they differ meaningfully in fleet composition, business strategy, and market positioning. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for income-oriented investors, value-focused traders, and anyone seeking exposure to the global energy supply chain. With tanker rates surging amid geopolitical disruptions, OPEC+ production shifts, and constrained fleet growth, understanding the relative performance and risk profiles of DHT and INSW has become increasingly important.

DHT Overview and Recent Performance

DHT Holdings, Inc. is an independent crude oil tanker company with a fleet exclusively composed of VLCCs — the workhorses of long-haul crude transportation. Headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda, with integrated management operations in Monaco, Norway, Singapore, and India, DHT has built its reputation on operational reliability, a transparent corporate structure, and a clearly defined capital allocation policy that returns 100% of ordinary net income to shareholders through quarterly cash dividends. As of recent quarters, DHT operated a fleet of 22 VLCCs and has maintained an unbroken dividend streak spanning over 60 consecutive quarters.

Over recent weeks, DHT shares have traded in the $16 to $18 range, with a 52-week range spanning approximately $10.70 to $20.55. The stock's year-to-date performance reflects a gain of roughly 50%, supported by strengthening VLCC spot rates that surged to nearly $65,000 per day in the fourth quarter of 2025 and have reportedly averaged around $79,000 per day in early 2026 bookings. DHT's fleet renewal strategy has been a central narrative: the company is in the midst of a four-vessel newbuilding program at leading South Korean shipyards, with the first vessel — DHT Antelope — delivered in early January 2026 and the remaining three expected by mid-2026. Simultaneously, DHT has monetized older tonnage, selling vessels such as DHT Europe and DHT China (both built in 2007) and DHT Bauhinia at attractive prices, generating substantial gains. The company's spot exposure stood at roughly 53–55% by late 2025, with the balance on time charters providing a degree of cash flow visibility. BTIG recently raised its price target on DHT to $18, maintaining a Buy rating, while the average analyst target sits near $20.20, suggesting modest upside from recent levels.

INSW Overview and Recent Performance

International Seaways, Inc. ranks among the largest tanker companies globally, providing energy transportation services for both crude oil and petroleum products. Headquartered in New York, INSW operates a diversified fleet of approximately 70 vessels spanning VLCCs, Suezmaxes, Aframaxes, and Panamax crude tankers, as well as LR1, LR2, and MR (Medium Range) product carriers. This dual-segment structure — Crude Tankers and Product Carriers — allows the company to capture demand across the broader energy shipping spectrum. INSW went public in December 2016 and has since delivered cumulative shareholder returns exceeding $1 billion since 2020.

In recent market activity, INSW shares have demonstrated exceptional strength, trading recently around $92 after starting the year near $44, translating to a year-to-date gain exceeding 100%. The stock's 52-week range spans approximately $39 to $93, with the upper bound repeatedly tested in recent sessions. INSW's fourth-quarter 2025 results marked its strongest quarter since early 2024, with net income of $128 million ($2.56 per diluted share) and adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) of $175 million. The company's fleet optimization program has been aggressive: ten vessels were sold in 2025 with an average age of 18 years, while six scrubber-fitted, dual-fuel-ready LR1 newbuildings are under construction, two of which were delivered in the second half of 2025. A defining strategic move occurred in January 2026 when INSW consolidated full ownership of Tankers International, a leading VLCC commercial pool, and expanded that platform into Suezmax management. The company's balance sheet remains robust, with a net loan-to-value ratio of approximately 13% and total liquidity of $724 million as of year-end 2025. INSW declared its largest-ever quarterly dividend of $2.15 per share in February 2026, representing 87% of adjusted net income. BTIG raised its price target to $70, with consensus analyst estimates near $93.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking an automated, data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like DHT and INSW, Tickeron offers a dedicated Trending AI Robots page. This curated section features the top-performing AI trading bots from among hundreds available on the platform — each designed to trade thousands of tickers across various timeframes and market conditions. The bots employ diverse trading styles, strategies, and risk parameters, with some achieving notable track records in specific sectors or market regimes. Rather than navigating the full catalog, investors can review this focused selection to identify bots that are currently aligned with real-time market dynamics. Performance metrics, trade frequency, and win-rate statistics are displayed for each featured bot, offering transparency into their operational histories. To explore which AI-driven strategies are gaining traction in today's markets, visit Trending AI Robots.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most fundamental distinction between DHT and INSW lies in fleet scope and revenue diversification. DHT is a pure-play VLCC operator — a focused bet on the largest crude tanker segment, where rates are highly sensitive to global oil trade volumes, OPEC+ decisions, and geopolitical disruptions. INSW, by contrast, operates across multiple vessel classes and two distinct segments (crude and products), which provides natural diversification: when crude tanker rates soften, product carrier earnings may hold steadier, and vice versa. This structural difference is reflected in revenue scale — INSW generated approximately $985 million in full-year 2025 revenues compared to DHT's roughly $566 million — and market capitalization, with INSW at roughly $4.6 billion versus DHT's approximately $3.0 billion.

On the shareholder returns front, DHT's 100% payout policy has produced a trailing dividend yield near 14%, substantially exceeding INSW's yield of roughly 4%. However, INSW's total return profile — combining dividends with share repurchases and capital appreciation — has delivered a far larger year-to-date gain. In terms of valuation, both stocks trade at compressed multiples: DHT at approximately 9 times trailing earnings and INSW at roughly 8.4 times, reflecting the market's historical tendency to discount cyclical shipping earnings. INSW carries a higher institutional ownership level at roughly 67% versus DHT's approximately 59%, suggesting somewhat stronger conviction among large asset managers. From a risk perspective, DHT's narrower fleet focus means its earnings are more directly exposed to VLCC rate fluctuations, while INSW's multi-segment model offers some insulation against downturns in any single vessel class.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend data and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis currently favors INSW as the stronger near-term candidate, though both stocks receive favorable ratings. INSW's combination of superior price momentum — evident in its year-to-date surge — broader fundamental ratings (three green FA indicators versus DHT's two), and stronger technical signal profile (six bullish TA indicators versus DHT's four) all tilt the balance in its direction. The company's multi-segment diversification, strategic consolidation of the Tankers International pool, and aggressive fleet modernization program provide multiple catalysts that align with the current upswing in tanker markets. That said, DHT's compelling dividend mechanics and focused VLCC exposure make it the more direct beneficiary if crude tanker rates sustain their elevated trajectory. In probabilistic terms, INSW appears to offer a wider range of positive outcomes under current conditions, while DHT may present a more attractive risk-reward profile for income-focused investors specifically seeking maximum VLCC leverage. Neither assessment constitutes a prediction, but rather a structured evaluation of observable market signals and fundamental positioning.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DHT vs. INSW commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DHT is a Buy and INSW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (DHT: $18.57 vs. INSW: $96.18)
Brand notoriety: DHT: Notable vs. INSW: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DHT: 75% vs. INSW: 61%
Market capitalization -- DHT: $2.99B vs. INSW: $4.76B
DHT [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $2.99B. INSW’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $4.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $118.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $17.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DHT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINSW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • DHT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • INSW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, INSW is a better buy in the long-term than DHT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DHT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INSW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DHT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • INSW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DHT is a better buy in the short-term than INSW.

Price Growth

DHT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.65% price change this week, while INSW (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +4.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

DHT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

INSW is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-0.80% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INSW($4.76B) has a higher market cap than DHT($2.99B). DHT (9.01) and INSW (8.76) have similar P/E ratio . INSW YTD gains are higher at: 116.156 vs. DHT (61.565). INSW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 750M vs. DHT (450M). DHT has less debt than INSW: DHT (506M) vs INSW (610M). INSW has higher revenues than DHT: INSW (985M) vs DHT (566M).
DHTINSWDHT / INSW
Capitalization2.99B4.76B63%
EBITDA450M750M60%
Gain YTD61.565116.15653%
P/E Ratio9.018.76103%
Revenue566M985M57%
Total Cash126MN/A-
Total Debt506M610M83%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DHT vs INSW: Fundamental Ratings
DHT
INSW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3046
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48
SMR RATING
1..100
3537
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3835
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6420
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DHT's Valuation (4) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as INSW (17). This means that DHT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.

DHT's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as INSW (8). This means that DHT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.

DHT's SMR Rating (35) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as INSW (37). This means that DHT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.

INSW's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as DHT (38). This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to DHT’s over the last 12 months.

INSW's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DHT (64). This means that INSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than DHT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DHTINSW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DHT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
INSW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRMG5.460.20
+3.80%
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF
VTEC98.65-0.07
-0.07%
Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
GBAB13.79-0.02
-0.14%
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal
IBIH25.60-0.05
-0.21%
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term Tips ETF
GBND49.70-0.11
-0.22%
Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF

DHT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DHT has been closely correlated with FRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DHT jumps, then FRO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DHT
1D Price
Change %
DHT100%
+0.11%
FRO - DHT
84%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
TNK - DHT
82%
Closely correlated
+2.60%
INSW - DHT
81%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
TEN - DHT
78%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
TK - DHT
75%
Closely correlated
+3.10%
More