Investors evaluating the marine shipping and energy transportation sector frequently encounter two prominent names: DHT Holdings and International Seaways. Both are publicly traded tanker companies that generate revenue by moving crude oil and petroleum products across international waters, yet they differ meaningfully in fleet composition, business strategy, and market positioning. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for income-oriented investors, value-focused traders, and anyone seeking exposure to the global energy supply chain. With tanker rates surging amid geopolitical disruptions, OPEC+ production shifts, and constrained fleet growth, understanding the relative performance and risk profiles of DHT and INSW has become increasingly important.
DHT Holdings, Inc. is an independent crude oil tanker company with a fleet exclusively composed of VLCCs — the workhorses of long-haul crude transportation. Headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda, with integrated management operations in Monaco, Norway, Singapore, and India, DHT has built its reputation on operational reliability, a transparent corporate structure, and a clearly defined capital allocation policy that returns 100% of ordinary net income to shareholders through quarterly cash dividends. As of recent quarters, DHT operated a fleet of 22 VLCCs and has maintained an unbroken dividend streak spanning over 60 consecutive quarters.
Over recent weeks, DHT shares have traded in the $16 to $18 range, with a 52-week range spanning approximately $10.70 to $20.55. The stock's year-to-date performance reflects a gain of roughly 50%, supported by strengthening VLCC spot rates that surged to nearly $65,000 per day in the fourth quarter of 2025 and have reportedly averaged around $79,000 per day in early 2026 bookings. DHT's fleet renewal strategy has been a central narrative: the company is in the midst of a four-vessel newbuilding program at leading South Korean shipyards, with the first vessel — DHT Antelope — delivered in early January 2026 and the remaining three expected by mid-2026. Simultaneously, DHT has monetized older tonnage, selling vessels such as DHT Europe and DHT China (both built in 2007) and DHT Bauhinia at attractive prices, generating substantial gains. The company's spot exposure stood at roughly 53–55% by late 2025, with the balance on time charters providing a degree of cash flow visibility. BTIG recently raised its price target on DHT to $18, maintaining a Buy rating, while the average analyst target sits near $20.20, suggesting modest upside from recent levels.
International Seaways, Inc. ranks among the largest tanker companies globally, providing energy transportation services for both crude oil and petroleum products. Headquartered in New York, INSW operates a diversified fleet of approximately 70 vessels spanning VLCCs, Suezmaxes, Aframaxes, and Panamax crude tankers, as well as LR1, LR2, and MR (Medium Range) product carriers. This dual-segment structure — Crude Tankers and Product Carriers — allows the company to capture demand across the broader energy shipping spectrum. INSW went public in December 2016 and has since delivered cumulative shareholder returns exceeding $1 billion since 2020.
In recent market activity, INSW shares have demonstrated exceptional strength, trading recently around $92 after starting the year near $44, translating to a year-to-date gain exceeding 100%. The stock's 52-week range spans approximately $39 to $93, with the upper bound repeatedly tested in recent sessions. INSW's fourth-quarter 2025 results marked its strongest quarter since early 2024, with net income of $128 million ($2.56 per diluted share) and adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) of $175 million. The company's fleet optimization program has been aggressive: ten vessels were sold in 2025 with an average age of 18 years, while six scrubber-fitted, dual-fuel-ready LR1 newbuildings are under construction, two of which were delivered in the second half of 2025. A defining strategic move occurred in January 2026 when INSW consolidated full ownership of Tankers International, a leading VLCC commercial pool, and expanded that platform into Suezmax management. The company's balance sheet remains robust, with a net loan-to-value ratio of approximately 13% and total liquidity of $724 million as of year-end 2025. INSW declared its largest-ever quarterly dividend of $2.15 per share in February 2026, representing 87% of adjusted net income. BTIG raised its price target to $70, with consensus analyst estimates near $93.
For traders seeking an automated, data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like DHT and INSW, Tickeron offers a dedicated Trending AI Robots page. This curated section features the top-performing AI trading bots from among hundreds available on the platform — each designed to trade thousands of tickers across various timeframes and market conditions. The bots employ diverse trading styles, strategies, and risk parameters, with some achieving notable track records in specific sectors or market regimes. Rather than navigating the full catalog, investors can review this focused selection to identify bots that are currently aligned with real-time market dynamics. Performance metrics, trade frequency, and win-rate statistics are displayed for each featured bot, offering transparency into their operational histories. To explore which AI-driven strategies are gaining traction in today's markets, visit Trending AI Robots.
The most fundamental distinction between DHT and INSW lies in fleet scope and revenue diversification. DHT is a pure-play VLCC operator — a focused bet on the largest crude tanker segment, where rates are highly sensitive to global oil trade volumes, OPEC+ decisions, and geopolitical disruptions. INSW, by contrast, operates across multiple vessel classes and two distinct segments (crude and products), which provides natural diversification: when crude tanker rates soften, product carrier earnings may hold steadier, and vice versa. This structural difference is reflected in revenue scale — INSW generated approximately $985 million in full-year 2025 revenues compared to DHT's roughly $566 million — and market capitalization, with INSW at roughly $4.6 billion versus DHT's approximately $3.0 billion.
On the shareholder returns front, DHT's 100% payout policy has produced a trailing dividend yield near 14%, substantially exceeding INSW's yield of roughly 4%. However, INSW's total return profile — combining dividends with share repurchases and capital appreciation — has delivered a far larger year-to-date gain. In terms of valuation, both stocks trade at compressed multiples: DHT at approximately 9 times trailing earnings and INSW at roughly 8.4 times, reflecting the market's historical tendency to discount cyclical shipping earnings. INSW carries a higher institutional ownership level at roughly 67% versus DHT's approximately 59%, suggesting somewhat stronger conviction among large asset managers. From a risk perspective, DHT's narrower fleet focus means its earnings are more directly exposed to VLCC rate fluctuations, while INSW's multi-segment model offers some insulation against downturns in any single vessel class.
Based on observable trend data and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis currently favors INSW as the stronger near-term candidate, though both stocks receive favorable ratings. INSW's combination of superior price momentum — evident in its year-to-date surge — broader fundamental ratings (three green FA indicators versus DHT's two), and stronger technical signal profile (six bullish TA indicators versus DHT's four) all tilt the balance in its direction. The company's multi-segment diversification, strategic consolidation of the Tankers International pool, and aggressive fleet modernization program provide multiple catalysts that align with the current upswing in tanker markets. That said, DHT's compelling dividend mechanics and focused VLCC exposure make it the more direct beneficiary if crude tanker rates sustain their elevated trajectory. In probabilistic terms, INSW appears to offer a wider range of positive outcomes under current conditions, while DHT may present a more attractive risk-reward profile for income-focused investors specifically seeking maximum VLCC leverage. Neither assessment constitutes a prediction, but rather a structured evaluation of observable market signals and fundamental positioning.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DHT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINSW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DHT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INSW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
DHT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.65% price change this week, while INSW (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +4.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.49%.
DHT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
INSW is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| DHT | INSW | DHT / INSW | |
| Capitalization | 2.99B | 4.76B | 63% |
| EBITDA | 450M | 750M | 60% |
| Gain YTD | 61.565 | 116.156 | 53% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.01 | 8.76 | 103% |
| Revenue | 566M | 985M | 57% |
| Total Cash | 126M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 506M | 610M | 83% |
DHT | INSW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 46 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DHT's Valuation (4) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as INSW (17). This means that DHT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.
DHT's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as INSW (8). This means that DHT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.
DHT's SMR Rating (35) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as INSW (37). This means that DHT’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as DHT (38). This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to DHT’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DHT (64). This means that INSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than DHT’s over the last 12 months.
| DHT | INSW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 70% | 8 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 66% | 18 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 72% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CRMG | 5.46 | 0.20 | +3.80% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | |||
| VTEC | 98.65 | -0.07 | -0.07% |
| Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | |||
| GBAB | 13.79 | -0.02 | -0.14% |
| Guggenheim Taxable Municipal | |||
| IBIH | 25.60 | -0.05 | -0.21% |
| iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term Tips ETF | |||
| GBND | 49.70 | -0.11 | -0.22% |
| Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DHT has been closely correlated with FRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DHT jumps, then FRO could also see price increases.