DIA
Price
$532.22
Change
+$4.71 (+0.89%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
45.9B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VOOV
Price
$229.03
Change
+$1.02 (+0.45%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
6.85B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIA vs VOOV

DIA vs VOOV Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) vs. Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV)

Key Takeaways

  • SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) tracks a price-weighted index of 30 large-cap U.S. stocks, while Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) follows a market-cap-weighted S&P 500 Value Index with approximately 400 holdings, resulting in significantly different diversification profiles.
  • DIA maintains a higher expense ratio of 0.16% compared to VOOV’s 0.07%, affecting long-term cost efficiency for buy-and-hold investors.
  • DIA exhibits concentrated exposure with notable weightings in financials and industrials, whereas VOOV provides broader value-oriented exposure across large-cap sectors with a tilt toward lower valuations.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed unit investment trusts or open-end funds that replicate their respective indexes without active stock selection or leverage.
  • Structural differences in index methodology—price weighting versus value screening—drive distinct risk exposures and sector allocations between the two funds.
  • VOOV offers greater liquidity in terms of holdings breadth, while DIA benefits from the iconic brand recognition of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Introduction

SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) represent two distinct approaches to large-cap U.S. equity exposure. DIA delivers concentrated access to 30 blue-chip companies through a price-weighted methodology, while VOOV targets the value segment of the broader S&P 500. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative options for investors seeking established market leaders versus undervalued large-cap names. Their comparison highlights differences in cost, diversification, and sector emphasis relevant to portfolio construction in the current environment.

SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) Overview

SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average, a price-weighted index of 30 prominent U.S. companies selected by the Wall Street Journal editors. The fund holds exactly 30 stocks and employs a passive replication strategy as a unit investment trust. Top holdings include Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) at approximately 11.5%, Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) near 9.2%, and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), with the top 10 positions accounting for over 50% of assets. Sector allocations emphasize financials, industrials, information technology, and health care. The expense ratio stands at 0.16%. Rebalancing occurs as needed to match index changes, with no active management or thematic overlays.

Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) Overview

Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) tracks the S&P 500 Value Index, which screens large-capitalization stocks for value characteristics such as lower price-to-book and price-to-earnings ratios. The fund holds approximately 400 securities and uses passive, market-capitalization-weighted replication. Top holdings feature Apple Inc. (AAPL) around 7.7%, Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) near 4.2%, and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM), with the top 10 comprising roughly 24% of assets. Sector exposure spans the value spectrum within the S&P 500, including financials, health care, and industrials. The expense ratio is 0.07%. The fund maintains an open-end structure with periodic index-driven rebalancing.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Large-cap U.S. equities continue to attract institutional and retail flows amid ongoing sector rotation between growth and value styles. Macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations, corporate earnings cycles, and inflation trends influence allocations across both price-weighted and value-screened benchmarks. Regulatory developments around financial services and industrial supply chains affect DIA’s concentrated holdings, while broader value factors such as dividend yields and book-value multiples support interest in VOOV. Capital continues to shift toward cost-efficient passive vehicles, with value strategies positioned to benefit from potential mean reversion in valuations relative to growth-oriented segments.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) has reflected the performance dynamics of its 30 constituent companies, with sensitivity to industrial and financial earnings reports. Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) has shown distinct behavior tied to value-factor rotations, often exhibiting lower volatility than the broader market during periods of style preference shifts. Relative positioning favors VOOV for investors prioritizing lower costs and broader diversification, while DIA suits those seeking targeted exposure to iconic industrial leaders. Differences in weighting methodologies contribute to varying responses to interest-rate movements and commodity trends over recent weeks and months.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on ETFs like DIA and VOOV may find the platform useful for refining strategies.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would likely favor Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) in the current environment. The fund’s lower expense ratio, broader diversification across approximately 400 holdings, and systematic value tilt provide structural advantages in cost efficiency and risk distribution. While SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) offers concentrated exposure to established leaders, the combination of higher fees and narrower holdings profile suggests VOOV aligns more closely with durable, lower-cost positioning for long-term investors evaluating relative value and momentum factors.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DIA vs. VOOV commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIA is a Hold and VOOV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIA has more net assets: 45.9B vs. VOOV (6.85B). VOOV (12.274) and DIA (11.701) have matching annual dividend yield . DIA was incepted earlier than VOOV: DIA (29 years) vs VOOV (16 years). VOOV (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than DIA (0.16). VOOV has a higher turnover DIA (8.00) vs DIA (8.00).
DIAVOOVDIA / VOOV
Gain YTD11.70112.27495%
Net Assets45.9B6.85B670%
Total Expense Ratio0.160.07229%
Turnover8.0032.0025%
Yield1.371.6782%
Fund Existence29 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DIAVOOV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VOOV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITB97.490.75
+0.78%
iShares US Home Construction ETF
BBP107.470.70
+0.66%
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF
KBWD12.600.02
+0.16%
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yld Fincl ETF
VBCF74.72-0.03
-0.04%
Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corp BdETF
NVTX20.93-0.04
-0.19%
Tradr 2X Long NVTS Daily ETF

DIA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIA has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DIA jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIA
1D Price
Change %
DIA100%
+0.98%
GS - DIA
71%
Closely correlated
+3.73%
JPM - DIA
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
AXP - DIA
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
SOLV - DIA
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
DOW - DIA
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
More

VOOV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOOV has been loosely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VOOV jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VOOV
1D Price
Change %
VOOV100%
+0.45%
CFG - VOOV
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
EMR - VOOV
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
SWK - VOOV
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
IVZ - VOOV
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
IR - VOOV
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
More