It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DINO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMPC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DINO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
DINO (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а -3.75% price change this week, while MPC (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was -3.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was -1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.90%.
DINO is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
MPC is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.
DINO | MPC | DINO / MPC | |
Capitalization | 12B | 73.7B | 16% |
EBITDA | 3.11B | 18.6B | 17% |
Gain YTD | -29.865 | 0.112 | -26,753% |
P/E Ratio | 7.31 | 8.65 | 84% |
Revenue | 32B | 148B | 22% |
Total Cash | 1.35B | 10.2B | 13% |
Total Debt | 3.1B | 28.5B | 11% |
DINO | MPC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DINO's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as MPC (44) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that DINO’s stock grew similarly to MPC’s over the last 12 months.
MPC's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is significantly better than the same rating for DINO (100) in the null industry. This means that MPC’s stock grew significantly faster than DINO’s over the last 12 months.
MPC's SMR Rating (46) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DINO (84) in the null industry. This means that MPC’s stock grew somewhat faster than DINO’s over the last 12 months.
MPC's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as DINO (81) in the null industry. This means that MPC’s stock grew similarly to DINO’s over the last 12 months.
DINO's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MPC (10) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that DINO’s stock grew similarly to MPC’s over the last 12 months.
DINO | MPC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago57% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago71% | 5 days ago77% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago63% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago72% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GALA.X | 0.052010 | 0.001144 | +2.25% |
Gala cryptocurrency | |||
PROM.X | 7.048725 | 0.046717 | +0.67% |
Prom cryptocurrency | |||
YFI.X | 11419.994000 | -28.613281 | -0.25% |
yearn.finance cryptocurrency | |||
DF.X | 0.045149 | -0.000948 | -2.06% |
dForce cryptocurrency | |||
ORN.X | 1.974126 | -0.058713 | -2.89% |
Orion cryptocurrency |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DINO has been closely correlated with VLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DINO jumps, then VLO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DINO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DINO | 100% | -1.86% | ||
VLO - DINO | 82% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
PBF - DINO | 81% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
MPC - DINO | 77% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
PSX - DINO | 74% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
PARR - DINO | 73% Closely correlated | +1.98% | ||
More |