DINO
Price
$91.47
Change
-$0.97 (-1.05%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
16.26B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PBF
Price
$72.28
Change
-$0.82 (-1.12%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
8.57B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DINO vs PBF

DINO vs PBF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 26, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. PBF Energy (PBF) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • HF Sinclair (DINO) operates a diversified downstream energy portfolio spanning refining, renewables, midstream, lubricants, and branded marketing, providing multiple revenue streams beyond pure refining.
  • PBF Energy (PBF) is a pure-play refiner with six U.S. facilities and roughly 1 million barrels per day of capacity, currently completing recovery from a major refinery fire and executing a broad cost-savings initiative.
  • Both stocks have posted strong year-over-year gains, with PBF showing higher percentage recovery from a deeper trough and DINO demonstrating more consistent operational profitability throughout the cycle.
  • DINO offers a higher dividend yield ($0.50/quarter) and returned over $724 million to shareholders in 2025, while PBF maintained its $0.275/quarter dividend even through operational disruptions.
  • Divergent risk profiles define the comparison: PBF carries higher recovery and turnaround execution risk, while DINO faces leadership transition uncertainty and broader commodity exposure.
  • The refining sector as a whole is benefiting from structurally constrained global capacity and improving supply-demand dynamics, a tailwind that lifts both names but may favor the more operationally stable player in the near term.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to the U.S. refining and downstream energy sector frequently encounter two prominent mid-cap names: DINO (HF Sinclair Corporation) and PBF (PBF Energy Inc.). Both companies transform crude oil into essential transportation fuels, yet they approach the market with meaningfully different business models, geographic footprints, and risk profiles. With the energy sector experiencing renewed momentum in recent weeks — driven by favorable refining margins, tight global capacity, and evolving U.S. biofuel policy — a clear-eyed comparison of these two stocks is timely for traders and long-term investors alike. This article examines how DINO and PBF compare across operations, recent performance, and the signals emerging from AI-driven market analysis tools.

DINO Overview and Recent Performance

DINO, HF Sinclair Corporation, is a diversified downstream energy company headquartered in Dallas, Texas. Its integrated operations span petroleum refining, renewable diesel production, lubricants and specialty products manufacturing, midstream logistics, and a branded marketing network of more than 1,700 Sinclair-branded fueling stations across the United States. This multi-segment structure differentiates DINO from pure-play refiners by providing earnings stability from non-refining businesses.

In recent market activity, DINO has demonstrated notable strength. The stock has rallied significantly from its 52-week low and is trading near multi-month highs, reflecting investor enthusiasm around several concurrent catalysts. Full-year 2025 results showcased the company's earnings power: adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) reached $2.3 billion, with record annual performance in both the Midstream and Marketing segments. The company returned $724 million to shareholders during the year through dividends and share repurchases. A particularly important development in recent months has been the dramatic turnaround in DINO's renewable diesel business, which swung from a loss to a substantial adjusted EBITDA contribution in the first quarter of 2026, aided by higher RIN (Renewable Identification Number) credit prices tied to expanded U.S. biofuel blending mandates. The company also recently underwent a leadership transition, with CEO Tim Go taking a voluntary leave of absence and Chairman Franklin Myers assuming the role on an interim basis — an uncertainty that markets appear to have absorbed without significant disruption.

PBF Overview and Recent Performance

PBF, PBF Energy Inc., is one of the largest independent petroleum refiners in the United States, operating six refineries with a combined crude processing capacity of approximately 1 million barrels per day. Headquartered in Parsippany, New Jersey, the company's facilities are predominantly coastal, positioned across the East Coast, Gulf Coast, Mid-Continent, and West Coast regions. PBF's refineries carry a high Nelson Complexity Index rating — a measure of a refinery's ability to upgrade lower-cost heavy crude oil into higher-value products — which historically provides a competitive margin advantage when light-heavy crude price differentials are wide.

The past year has been a story of resilience and recovery for PBF. A fire at the company's Martinez, California refinery in February 2025 caused extensive damage and forced the facility into partial operation for much of the year, weighing heavily on throughput and financial results. Excluding special items, the company posted an adjusted operating loss for full-year 2025. However, PBF successfully secured approximately $893.5 million in insurance reimbursements (net of deductibles and retentions) to cover restoration costs and business interruption, and the Martinez refinery's full restart has progressed on schedule, with the critical Catalytic Cracking Unit returning to service by early March 2026. In parallel, management launched the Refining Business Improvement (RBI) initiative targeting over $350 million in annualized run-rate cost savings by year-end 2026. The stock has responded forcefully to these recovery signals, rallying sharply in recent weeks and outperforming many peers on a percentage basis from its 52-week trough. The company also maintained its quarterly dividend of $0.275 per share throughout the disruption, signaling confidence in the balance sheet trajectory.

Trending AI Robots

In an environment as dynamic as today's energy and refining sector, traders increasingly turn to artificial intelligence for signal generation, risk management, and strategy execution. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a select group of the platform's hundreds of AI-powered trading bots — each designed to trade different tickers across varying timeframes, strategies, and risk parameters. These bots are powered by Financial Learning Models (FLMs), advanced machine learning architectures that continuously ingest price action, volume data, and volatility signals to adapt to changing market conditions in real time. Only those bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a place in the Trending section. Across the platform, top-performing virtual agents have posted annualized returns ranging from approximately 65% to over 170%, with win rates reaching as high as 67% and profit factors above 4.0 — meaning over $4 earned for every $1 risked. Whether a trader prefers a single-ticker strategy or a diversified multi-agent approach, exploring the Trending AI Robots page offers a data-driven starting point for identifying which bots and which tickers may align best with current market conditions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When comparing DINO and PBF side by side, several differentiating factors emerge. From a business model perspective, DINO is meaningfully more diversified. Its midstream, lubricants, and marketing segments provide steadier, fee-based and branded earnings that partially buffer the volatility of refining margins. PBF, by contrast, is a near-pure refining play — its earnings are more directly levered to crack spreads and crude differentials, making it potentially more sensitive to both upside and downside commodity moves.

On recent momentum, both stocks have rallied impressively, but the character of those moves differs. PBF's surge has been fueled by the Martinez restart catalyst and operational normalization — a recovery narrative that can generate powerful one-time re-rating. DINO's advance has been more fundamentally anchored in broad-based earnings delivery, including a rapidly improving renewables segment and record midstream profitability.

Regarding risk factors, PBF carries elevated operational concentration risk — a single facility disruption can materially impact consolidated results, as the Martinez incident demonstrated. The company's higher debt load (approximately $2.4 billion at year-end 2025) also warrants monitoring. DINO's risks include the ongoing leadership transition, exposure to renewable fuel credit market volatility, and the inherent cyclicality present across all refining-linked businesses.

In terms of shareholder returns, DINO has established a clearer track record of aggressive capital return, with its $0.50 quarterly dividend and consistent buyback activity. PBF maintained its dividend but at a lower $0.275 per share and prioritized balance sheet repair.

Market sentiment around both stocks has improved considerably in recent weeks alongside broader energy sector rotation. The combination of structurally constrained global refining capacity, growing demand for transportation fuels, and U.S. policy support for biofuels has created a constructive backdrop that benefits both companies, though the degree of operating leverage each captures from these tailwinds differs materially.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, operational stability, and multi-segment earnings quality, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely express a near-term preference for DINO over PBF. The rationale rests on several probabilistic factors: DINO's diversified revenue base tends to produce smoother earnings trajectories that AI models favoring trend consistency find more navigable; the company's renewables segment has transitioned from a drag to a contributor, providing a differentiated growth catalyst; and the stock's price action in recent weeks has demonstrated strong momentum with comparatively lower volatility than the more recovery-driven moves in PBF. That said, PBF presents a compelling case for traders with higher risk tolerance who are willing to bet on the Martinez restart fully materializing and the RBI cost savings flowing through to earnings. In a sector as cyclical as refining, the AI-favored choice is not always the one with the highest potential upside — it is the one where the data signal is clearest and the path forward is most reliably mapped.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DINO vs. PBF commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DINO is a StrongBuy and PBF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (DINO: $91.47 vs. PBF: $72.28)
Brand notoriety: DINO and PBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DINO: 110% vs. PBF: 107%
Market capitalization -- DINO: $16.26B vs. PBF: $8.57B
DINO [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $16.26B. PBF’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $8.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $92.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DINO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DINO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DINO and PBF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DINO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DINO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PBF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DINO and PBF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DINO (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а +3.59% price change this week, while PBF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was +17.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +3.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

DINO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

PBF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+3.50% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DINO($16.3B) has a higher market cap than PBF($8.57B). DINO has higher P/E ratio than PBF: DINO (8.72) vs PBF (6.33). PBF YTD gains are higher at: 170.441 vs. DINO (101.901). DINO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.59B vs. PBF (2.66B). DINO has more cash in the bank: 2.26B vs. PBF (894M). PBF has less debt than DINO: PBF (2.52B) vs DINO (3.24B). PBF has higher revenues than DINO: PBF (34.4B) vs DINO (31.2B).
DINOPBFDINO / PBF
Capitalization16.3B8.57B190%
EBITDA3.59B2.66B135%
Gain YTD101.901170.44160%
P/E Ratio8.726.33138%
Revenue31.2B34.4B91%
Total Cash2.26B894M253%
Total Debt3.24B2.52B129%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DINO vs PBF: Fundamental Ratings
DINO
PBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2832
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2437
SMR RATING
1..100
4741
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9893
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PBF's Valuation (12) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as DINO (28) in the null industry. This means that PBF’s stock grew similarly to DINO’s over the last 12 months.

DINO's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as PBF (37) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that DINO’s stock grew similarly to PBF’s over the last 12 months.

PBF's SMR Rating (41) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as DINO (47) in the null industry. This means that PBF’s stock grew similarly to DINO’s over the last 12 months.

PBF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as DINO (35) in the null industry. This means that PBF’s stock grew similarly to DINO’s over the last 12 months.

PBF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as DINO (98) in the null industry. This means that PBF’s stock grew similarly to DINO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINOPBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DINO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RRC40.140.59
+1.49%
Range Resources Corp
ALOVU10.030.02
+0.20%
Aldabra 4 Liquidity Opportunity Veh
LASE0.98N/A
N/A
Laser Photonics Corp
TGLS43.44-0.15
-0.34%
Tecnoglass
PERI9.54-0.04
-0.42%
Perion Network Ltd

DINO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DINO has been closely correlated with MPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DINO jumps, then MPC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DINO
1D Price
Change %
DINO100%
-1.05%
MPC - DINO
78%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
VLO - DINO
78%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
PSX - DINO
76%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
PBF - DINO
75%
Closely correlated
-1.12%
DK - DINO
74%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
More

PBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBF has been closely correlated with VLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PBF jumps, then VLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBF
1D Price
Change %
PBF100%
-1.12%
VLO - PBF
77%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
DK - PBF
76%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
DINO - PBF
76%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
MPC - PBF
73%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
PARR - PBF
73%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
More