The U.S. refining sector remains a focal point for energy investors navigating volatile crude oil prices, shifting crack spreads (the price difference between crude oil and refined products), and evolving regulatory frameworks. Within this landscape, PARR and PBF represent two distinct approaches to downstream energy exposure: one a smaller, regionally focused refiner and the other a mid-major with coast-to-coast operations. This stock comparison examines how these two companies have performed amid recent market conditions and which one exhibits characteristics that AI-driven analysis would find more compelling in the current environment.
Par Pacific Holdings (PARR) is a Houston-headquartered independent refiner with approximately 219,000 barrels per day of total throughput capacity across its facilities in Hawaii, Wyoming, Montana, and Washington State. The company also owns retail fuel stations and logistics assets within its operating regions, giving it a degree of vertical integration unusual for a refiner of its size. PARR's business model depends heavily on niche markets where geographic isolation provides a natural moat, particularly in Hawaii, where imported refined products face high shipping costs.
In recent weeks, PARR's share price has faced headwinds tied to narrowing crack spreads in its core Pacific markets and concerns about maintenance-related downtime at certain facilities. The company's Hawaii operations, which account for a substantial portion of its refining EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), have been navigating softer jet fuel demand trends while adjusting to competitive import dynamics. Broader market sentiment toward small-cap refiners has also tempered enthusiasm for PARR, as investors have gravitated toward names with stronger balance sheets and wider diversification during periods of margin compression.
PBF Energy (PBF) is one of the largest independent refiners in the United States, with six refineries and a combined crude throughput capacity exceeding 1 million barrels per day. Its facilities are strategically located in New Jersey, Delaware, Ohio, Louisiana, California, and a partnership interest in a Minnesota refinery. This geographic diversification allows PBF to source a wide range of crude grades—from light sweet to heavy sour—and serve multiple product markets with different seasonal demand patterns.
Over recent market cycles, PBF has demonstrated the ability to capture favorable margins when Gulf Coast and Mid-Continent crack spreads widen. Recently, the stock has benefited from resilient distillate demand and the sustained strength of gasoline cracks in key markets. However, PBF also carries higher absolute debt levels than some peers, and its exposure to California's stringent regulatory environment has drawn scrutiny from analysts evaluating long-term refining viability in that state. Despite these concerns, PBF's scale and diversified asset base have supported relatively steadier institutional investor interest compared to smaller refining names.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers traders and investors a curated view into the platform's most relevant AI-powered trading bots for current market conditions. With hundreds of AI trading bots available—each trading thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and other instruments—only those demonstrating statistically robust performance, consistent signal quality, and adaptability to prevailing market regimes earn placement in this section. The bots featured employ varied trading strategies, timeframes, and risk management rules; some focus on short-term momentum, while others target swing trades or longer-duration trends. Performance metrics such as win rates, Sharpe ratios, and return figures are accessible directly on the platform, helping users evaluate bot suitability for their own trading objectives. To explore which AI-driven strategies are currently leading, visit the Trending AI Robots page and discover the bots aligned with today's market dynamics.
When placed side by side, PARR and PBF illuminate a fundamental trade-off in refining sector investing: niche focus versus scale-driven resilience. PARR's concentrated geographic footprint means that regional supply-demand imbalances can swing its earnings sharply in either direction, while PBF's multi-region presence smooths out localized disruptions but also introduces exposure to regulatory and operational complexity across different jurisdictions.
From a market positioning standpoint, PBF's larger market capitalization and higher trading liquidity make it more accessible to institutional investors, whereas PARR's smaller float can lead to more pronounced volatility during risk-off events. In terms of growth drivers, PARR's acquisition-oriented strategy—most notably its 2023 expansion into the Billings, Montana market—has added capacity, though integration risks remain a factor. PBF, meanwhile, has prioritized balance sheet deleveraging and shareholder returns through buybacks and dividends, a strategy that may appeal to income-focused investors.
Risk factors diverge meaningfully. PARR's Hawaii-heavy revenue stream exposes it to tourism-driven fuel demand and specific regulatory mandates unique to that state. PBF's California refining operations face similar regulatory headwinds amplified by the state's aggressive decarbonization timeline. On the sentiment front, both stocks have experienced periods of pressure in recent weeks, but PBF's greater analyst coverage and diversified crude sourcing have contributed to relatively more stable institutional sentiment.
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, relative momentum, and market positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely tilt in favor of PBF over PARR under current conditions. The AI's preference would stem from PBF's broader geographic diversification, higher trading liquidity, and relatively more stable price trend patterns compared to PARR's higher volatility and regionally concentrated risk profile. That said, this probabilistic assessment acknowledges that PARR's niche-market advantages could reassert themselves quickly if Pacific Basin crack spreads widen or if a strategic catalyst materializes. The AI framework continuously reassesses both tickers as new data emerges, and traders are encouraged to monitor real-time signals through Tickeron's platform for the most current positioning insights.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsIt is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PARR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PARR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
PARR (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а +11.16% price change this week, while PBF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was +17.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +3.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.35%.
PARR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
PBF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.
| PARR | PBF | PARR / PBF | |
| Capitalization | 4.31B | 8.57B | 50% |
| EBITDA | 792M | 2.66B | 30% |
| Gain YTD | 144.821 | 170.441 | 85% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.74 | 6.33 | 154% |
| Revenue | 7.54B | 34.4B | 22% |
| Total Cash | 172M | 894M | 19% |
| Total Debt | 1.35B | 2.52B | 54% |
PARR | PBF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PBF's Valuation (12) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PARR (85) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that PBF’s stock grew significantly faster than PARR’s over the last 12 months.
PARR's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PBF (37) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that PARR’s stock grew similarly to PBF’s over the last 12 months.
PARR's SMR Rating (29) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PBF (41) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that PARR’s stock grew similarly to PBF’s over the last 12 months.
PARR's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PBF (34) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that PARR’s stock grew similarly to PBF’s over the last 12 months.
PARR's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBF (93) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that PARR’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBF’s over the last 12 months.
| PARR | PBF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 77% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PARR has been closely correlated with DK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PARR jumps, then DK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PARR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PARR | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| DK - PARR | 76% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| VLO - PARR | 73% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| DINO - PARR | 71% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| MPC - PARR | 68% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| PBF - PARR | 68% Closely correlated | -1.12% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBF has been closely correlated with VLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PBF jumps, then VLO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBF | 100% | -1.12% | ||
| VLO - PBF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| DK - PBF | 76% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| DINO - PBF | 76% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| MPC - PBF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| PARR - PBF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
More | ||||