DPZ
Price
$440.04
Change
-$2.38 (-0.54%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
14.94B
60 days until earnings call
YUM
Price
$141.28
Change
-$1.28 (-0.90%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
39.21B
87 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPZ vs YUM

Header iconDPZ vs YUM Comparison
Open Charts DPZ vs YUMBanner chart's image
Dominos Pizza
Price$440.04
Change-$2.38 (-0.54%)
Volume$469.13K
Capitalization14.94B
Yum! Brands
Price$141.28
Change-$1.28 (-0.90%)
Volume$2.26M
Capitalization39.21B
DPZ vs YUM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPZ vs. YUM commentary
Aug 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZ is a StrongBuy and YUM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2025
Stock price -- (DPZ: $440.04 vs. YUM: $141.28)
Brand notoriety: DPZ and YUM are both notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZ: 77% vs. YUM: 116%
Market capitalization -- DPZ: $14.94B vs. YUM: $39.21B
DPZ [@Restaurants] is valued at $14.94B. YUM’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $39.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYUM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YUM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, YUM is a better buy in the long-term than DPZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • YUM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DPZ and YUM are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DPZ (@Restaurants) experienced а -5.61% price change this week, while YUM (@Restaurants) price change was -2.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

DPZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2025.

YUM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.49% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUM($39.2B) has a higher market cap than DPZ($14.9B). YUM has higher P/E ratio than DPZ: YUM (27.87) vs DPZ (25.55). YUM YTD gains are higher at: 6.324 vs. DPZ (5.666). YUM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.62B vs. DPZ (1.05B). YUM has more cash in the bank: 607M vs. DPZ (273M). DPZ has less debt than YUM: DPZ (5.21B) vs YUM (11.4B). YUM has higher revenues than DPZ: YUM (7.74B) vs DPZ (4.78B).
DPZYUMDPZ / YUM
Capitalization14.9B39.2B38%
EBITDA1.05B2.62B40%
Gain YTD5.6666.32490%
P/E Ratio25.5527.8792%
Revenue4.78B7.74B62%
Total Cash273M607M45%
Total Debt5.21B11.4B46%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZ vs YUM: Fundamental Ratings
DPZ
YUM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
568
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7920
SMR RATING
1..100
10010
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5837
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
758

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

YUM's Valuation (55) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (73). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZ (79). This means that YUM’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZ (100). This means that YUM’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (61). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (58). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPZYUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLNK40.885.49
+15.51%
Grayscale Chainlink Trust (LINK)
CSM72.600.54
+0.75%
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
ACWV118.310.32
+0.27%
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
BUFT23.840.02
+0.08%
FT Vest Buffered Allctn Dfnsv ETF
MCH26.13-0.01
-0.03%
Matthews China Active ETF

DPZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPZ has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPZ jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZ
1D Price
Change %
DPZ100%
-0.84%
YUM - DPZ
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
QSR - DPZ
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
CNNE - DPZ
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
FRSH - DPZ
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
CAKE - DPZ
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
More

YUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUM has been loosely correlated with QSR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUM jumps, then QSR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUM
1D Price
Change %
YUM100%
-0.90%
QSR - YUM
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
MCD - YUM
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
YUMC - YUM
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FRSH - YUM
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
DPZ - YUM
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
More