DPZ
Price
$326.33
Change
-$2.64 (-0.80%)
Updated
Jul 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.94B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YUM
Price
$147.16
Change
-$0.21 (-0.14%)
Updated
Jul 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
40.62B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPZ vs YUM

DPZ vs YUM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Domino's Pizza (DPZ) vs. Yum! Brands (YUM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Domino's Pizza (DPZ) and Yum! Brands (YUM) operate in the consumer cyclical sector with exposure to quick-service restaurants, though DPZ focuses primarily on pizza delivery while YUM manages a broader portfolio including KFC and Taco Bell.
  • Over the past year, YUM has shown relatively stronger performance compared to DPZ amid differing operational focuses and market responses.
  • Both companies face upcoming second-quarter 2026 earnings reports, with DPZ scheduled for July 20 and YUM for July 30, providing near-term catalysts for sentiment shifts.
  • Recent market activity for DPZ has centered on delivery trends and product innovation, while YUM has navigated a Taco Bell-related health investigation alongside strategic divestitures such as the Pizza Hut sale.
  • Volatility metrics indicate DPZ has experienced higher price swings than YUM in recent periods, influencing relative risk profiles.
  • Sector exposure remains similar, yet differences in business concentration and growth drivers create distinct positioning for investors seeking stability versus targeted growth opportunities.

Introduction

Domino's Pizza (DPZ) and Yum! Brands (YUM) represent established players in the quick-service restaurant industry, making them relevant for comparison among investors and traders focused on consumer cyclical stocks. This analysis examines their business models, recent performance trends, and relative positioning in the current market environment. Traders monitoring earnings catalysts, sector rotations, or AI-driven signals may find value in understanding the contrasts between DPZ's delivery-centric approach and YUM's diversified brand portfolio. The comparison highlights observable factors such as momentum and risk characteristics without projecting future outcomes.

DPZ Overview and Recent Performance

Domino's Pizza (DPZ) specializes in pizza delivery and carryout operations, primarily through a franchise model with a strong emphasis on digital ordering platforms. In recent weeks, the stock has traded in a range influenced by anticipation surrounding its second-quarter 2026 earnings release on July 20. Market activity has reflected attention to delivery sales trends and new menu items aimed at sustaining growth amid competitive pressures. Broader performance over the trailing twelve months shows underperformance relative to some peers, with prices recently near $322 following intraday fluctuations. Sentiment has been shaped by analyst commentary on fundamentals, including revenue and margin metrics, while the stock's 52-week range of approximately $282 to $496 underscores periods of volatility.

YUM Overview and Recent Performance

Yum! Brands (YUM) oversees a portfolio of quick-service restaurants including KFC and Taco Bell, following the divestiture of Pizza Hut. Recent market activity has been affected by a health investigation linked to Taco Bell, alongside the company's strategic focus on core brands and a $4 billion share repurchase authorization. The stock has traded around $148 to $152 in recent sessions, with second-quarter 2026 earnings scheduled for July 30. Performance over the past year has shown relative resilience compared to certain peers, supported by steady revenue figures and margin profiles. Sentiment reflects both operational updates and external factors such as supply chain precautions, contributing to mixed technical signals in the near term.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a broader pool of hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics tailored to current market conditions. Only the most suitable and promising ones, selected from totals such as 298 or 351 in recent assessments, earn placement in the trending section. Available bots encompass diverse styles including signal agents with differing risk levels and historical metrics, allowing users to explore options aligned with specific objectives. This curated approach provides traders with data-driven insights into automated strategies. For further details on these tools, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Domino's Pizza (DPZ) operates a more concentrated business model centered on pizza delivery, creating exposure primarily to that category, whereas Yum! Brands (YUM) benefits from diversification across multiple brands but has recently streamlined its portfolio. Growth drivers differ, with DPZ emphasizing digital innovation and menu updates, while YUM focuses on brand-specific initiatives and capital returns via buybacks. Recent momentum shows YUM maintaining relatively steadier performance amid external challenges, contrasting with DPZ's higher observed volatility. Risk factors include DPZ's sensitivity to delivery economics and YUM's exposure to brand-specific incidents such as the recent Taco Bell investigation. Sector exposure is shared in consumer cyclicals, yet market sentiment varies based on earnings visibility and operational narratives, presenting trade-offs between focused growth potential and portfolio stability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, relative stability, and positioning ahead of earnings, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to YUM over DPZ. YUM's broader brand base and recent strategic actions appear to support more consistent positioning in the current environment, though outcomes remain subject to upcoming data releases and market dynamics. This assessment reflects pattern recognition rather than definitive forecasts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DPZ vs. YUM commentary
Jul 22, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZ is a Buy and YUM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2026
Stock price -- (DPZ: $328.97 vs. YUM: $147.37)
Brand notoriety: DPZ and YUM are both notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZ: 195% vs. YUM: 120%
Market capitalization -- DPZ: $10.94B vs. YUM: $40.62B
DPZ [@Restaurants] is valued at $10.94B. YUM’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $40.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $190.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYUM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YUM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, YUM is a better buy in the long-term than DPZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPZ’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPZ’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • YUM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DPZ is a better buy in the short-term than YUM.

Price Growth

DPZ (@Restaurants) experienced а +6.17% price change this week, while YUM (@Restaurants) price change was -8.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

DPZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 08, 2026.

YUM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.10% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUM($40.6B) has a higher market cap than DPZ($10.9B). YUM has higher P/E ratio than DPZ: YUM (23.77) vs DPZ (18.65). YUM YTD gains are higher at: -1.657 vs. DPZ (-20.187). YUM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.89B vs. DPZ (1.04B). DPZ has less debt than YUM: DPZ (5.14B) vs YUM (12B). YUM has higher revenues than DPZ: YUM (8.49B) vs DPZ (4.98B).
DPZYUMDPZ / YUM
Capitalization10.9B40.6B27%
EBITDA1.04B2.89B36%
Gain YTD-20.187-1.6571,219%
P/E Ratio18.6523.7778%
Revenue4.98B8.49B59%
Total CashN/A689M-
Total Debt5.14B12B43%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZ vs YUM: Fundamental Ratings
DPZ
YUM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1156
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10036
SMR RATING
1..100
1008
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8270
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPZ's Valuation (24) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (29). This means that DPZ’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZ (100). This means that YUM’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZ (100). This means that YUM’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (62). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (82). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPZYUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YUM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GAU1.760.04
+2.33%
Galiano Gold
KVAC12.30N/A
N/A
Keen Vision Acquisition Corp
CHSCP26.63-0.09
-0.34%
CHS
HSAI14.93-0.07
-0.47%
Hesai Group American Depositary Share each ADS represents one
UHAL70.89-0.41
-0.58%
U-Haul Holding Company

DPZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPZ has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPZ jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZ
1D Price
Change %
DPZ100%
+2.11%
FRSH - DPZ
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
WEN - DPZ
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
JACK - DPZ
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
YUMC - DPZ
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
PTLO - DPZ
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
More

YUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUM has been loosely correlated with MCD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUM jumps, then MCD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUM
1D Price
Change %
YUM100%
-0.37%
MCD - YUM
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
FRSH - YUM
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
DPZ - YUM
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
DRI - YUM
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
YUMC - YUM
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
More