ECG
Price
$127.45
Change
-$2.54 (-1.95%)
Updated
Jul 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.51B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLR
Price
$51.70
Change
-$0.50 (-0.96%)
Updated
Jul 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.22B
10 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECG vs FLR

ECG vs FLR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 26, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Everus Construction Group (ECG) vs. Fluor Corporation (FLR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Everus Construction Group (ECG) is a U.S.-focused specialty contractor riding strong tailwinds from data center and utility infrastructure spending, with record Q1 2026 results and raised full-year guidance.
  • Fluor Corporation (FLR) is a global engineering and construction giant in the midst of a strategic transformation, monetizing non-core assets and returning capital to shareholders while navigating uneven segment performance.
  • ECG has delivered substantially stronger relative performance over the past year, with its stock up more than 88% compared to FLR's decline of approximately 6% over the same period.
  • FLR offers a far larger revenue base ($15.2 billion TTM versus $4.0 billion for ECG), a massive $25.7 billion backlog, and a lower price-to-sales ratio, but carries higher operational complexity and earnings volatility.
  • Both stocks operate in the construction and engineering sector, yet their diverging paths reflect fundamentally different business models, scale, and growth profiles.
  • ECG's comparatively simpler, domestic-focused model has attracted strong momentum-driven interest, while FLR's restructuring story and global exposures present a more value-oriented proposition.

Introduction

Investors evaluating the construction and engineering space are increasingly weighing two distinct opportunities: ECG (Everus Construction Group), a recently listed U.S. specialty contractor with accelerating momentum, and FLR (Fluor Corporation), a century-old global engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) firm undergoing a major transformation. Though both generate revenue from building and infrastructure, their scale, geographic reach, and current market positioning could hardly be more different. This comparison examines how these two stocks stack up across key dimensions — from recent performance and growth drivers to risk factors and sentiment — offering a framework for traders and investors assessing relative positioning in today's market environment.

ECG Overview and Recent Performance

Everus Construction Group, a member of the S&P SmallCap 600 index, provides electrical and mechanical (E&M) and transmission and distribution (T&D) contracting services across the United States. The company serves commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, and renewables customers, with particularly strong exposure to the fast-growing data center submarket. ECG became a stand-alone publicly traded entity in late 2024 after being spun off from MDU Resources.

In recent weeks, ECG shares have experienced a notable pullback after a period of exceptional strength. The stock traded near $130 as of late July 2026, down from a 52-week high of $171.58 reached in May, yet still up over 50% year-to-date and roughly 88% over the trailing 12 months. This pullback has occurred despite fundamentally strong business performance. In its Q1 2026 report, ECG posted record revenues of $1.04 billion, up 25.4% year-over-year, alongside net income growth of 58.9%. The company also raised its full-year 2026 guidance, now projecting revenues between $4.3 billion and $4.4 billion and EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) of $345 million to $360 million. A key catalyst was the April acquisition of SE&M Constructors, which expanded ECG's footprint in the Southeast U.S. and deepened its capabilities in pharmaceutical, industrial, and healthcare end markets. Backlog stood at a record $3.68 billion as of March 31, 2026, up 20.4% year-over-year. The recent share price weakness appears tied more to broader market rotation and profit-taking following a massive rally than to any deterioration in business fundamentals.

FLR Overview and Recent Performance

Fluor Corporation is a Fortune 500 global engineering and construction firm headquartered in Irving, Texas, with nearly 23,500 employees worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Urban Solutions (advanced technologies, life sciences, mining, and infrastructure), Energy Solutions (oil and gas, chemicals, LNG, and power), and Mission Solutions (U.S. government and nuclear services). Fluor's 2025 revenue totaled $15.5 billion, and its backlog as of Q1 2026 stood at $25.7 billion.

FLR shares have followed a more turbulent trajectory. Trading near $52 in late July 2026, the stock is up approximately 32% year-to-date but remains down roughly 6% over the past 12 months. The company has been actively reshaping its portfolio. In recent months, Fluor completed the sale of its remaining NuScale Power stake — generating approximately $2.4 billion in total proceeds since September 2025 — and divested its equity stake in the ICA-Fluor Daniel joint venture in Mexico for $175 million. The company also entered into a long-term agreement with Saudi Aramco as a Program Management Consultancy contractor. Financially, Q1 2026 results were mixed: revenue declined 8% year-over-year to $3.6 billion, and adjusted EBITDA came in at $60 million. A $96 million charge related to a legacy legal matter weighed on Mission Solutions. On the positive side, Fluor reported its strongest Q1 operating cash flow in nine years at $110 million and repurchased $516 million in shares, targeting $1.4 billion in buybacks for the full year. The company narrowed its 2026 adjusted EBITDA guidance to $525–$560 million.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking an analytical edge in comparing stocks like ECG and FLR, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate shifting market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots covering thousands of tickers across every sector, but only those demonstrating the strongest real-time adaptability and performance consistency earn placement in this featured section. These bots employ various trading styles — from swing trading to high-frequency models operating on 5-minute, 15-minute, and 60-minute timeframes — with select strategies achieving annualized returns that have ranged from approximately 50% to over 230% in certain sectors, according to company-reported data. Each bot comes with detailed performance statistics, win rates, and tracked trade histories, allowing users to evaluate strategies before committing capital. To explore which AI trading bots are currently leading the market, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

At first glance, ECG and FLR may appear to inhabit the same industry, but a closer look reveals stark contrasts. ECG operates a relatively focused, domestic specialty contracting model with two clearly defined segments. Its revenue base of roughly $4.0 billion (trailing twelve months) is concentrated in the U.S., where it benefits from secular trends in data center construction, grid modernization, and commercial electrification. Fluor, by contrast, is a sprawling global enterprise with $15.2 billion in TTM revenue, exposure to more than a dozen end markets across multiple continents, and a client roster that includes national governments and the world's largest energy companies.

From a growth perspective, ECG is clearly in the faster lane. Its Q1 2026 revenue grew over 25%, net income surged nearly 59%, and management raised forward guidance — all indicators of strong operational momentum. FLR, meanwhile, is managing a more complex transition: shrinking its Energy Solutions backlog as legacy projects wind down, absorbing litigation-related charges, and redeploying capital from asset sales toward share repurchases. Revenue declined 8% year-over-year in Q1 2026, and its adjusted EBITDA guidance was narrowed at the upper end.

Valuation tells a nuanced story. ECG trades at roughly 30 times trailing earnings and 1.7 times sales, reflecting the premium the market assigns to its growth trajectory. FLR trades at approximately 24 times trailing earnings and just 0.55 times sales — a significant discount that reflects its lower margin profile and earnings volatility. FLR's price-to-book ratio of 2.5 is also notably lower than ECG's 9.9.

Risk profiles diverge meaningfully. ECG's key risk factors include its heavy reliance on U.S. commercial construction cycles, concentration in the data center submarket, and a relatively short public-company track record. FLR's risks are more global in nature: geopolitical exposure (Middle East, Mexico), project cost overruns on fixed-price contracts, legacy legal liabilities, and cyclicality across its energy and mining end markets. On the other hand, FLR's 82% reimbursable backlog provides a meaningful cushion against cost inflation, and its $3.7 billion cash position offers substantial financial flexibility.

Sentiment data also paints a contrasting picture. ECG enjoys strong institutional support — over 82% of shares are institutionally held — and the stock's short interest is a relatively modest 3.8% of outstanding shares. FLR, despite 95% institutional ownership, carries a short interest of approximately 6.8% of outstanding shares, suggesting a more skeptical market posture. Analyst coverage is positive on both names, though ECG's consensus price target implies roughly 30% upside from late-July levels, while FLR's target suggests more modest appreciation potential.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor ECG in the current environment. The stock's combination of accelerating revenue growth, expanding margins, a record backlog, and upwardly revised guidance presents a cleaner, more consistent trend profile — attributes that pattern-recognition models typically weight favorably. FLR's transformation story is not without merit: its strong balance sheet, aggressive capital return program, and diverse project pipeline offer a compelling value case. However, the company's choppy earnings trajectory, segment-level volatility, and higher short interest introduce greater uncertainty into near-term trend signals. This does not mean FLR lacks long-term potential, but rather that in a head-to-head comparison of current trend quality and stability, the AI's probabilistic assessment would lean toward the stock demonstrating more linear, confirmable momentum — and at present, that stock is ECG.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ECG vs. FLR commentary
Jul 28, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECG is a Buy and FLR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2026
Stock price -- (ECG: $127.56 vs. FLR: $51.70)
Brand notoriety: ECG and FLR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECG: 59% vs. FLR: 74%
Market capitalization -- ECG: $6.51B vs. FLR: $7.22B
ECG [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $6.51B. FLR’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $7.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $9.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFLR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ECG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FLR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ECG and FLR are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FLR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLR is a better buy in the short-term than ECG.

Price Growth

ECG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -2.99% price change this week, while FLR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +4.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECG is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

FLR is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-3.15% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLR($7.22B) has a higher market cap than ECG($6.51B). ECG has higher P/E ratio than FLR: ECG (29.19) vs FLR (23.61). ECG YTD gains are higher at: 49.088 vs. FLR (30.457). ECG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 337M vs. FLR (-206M). FLR has more cash in the bank: 3.67B vs. ECG (293M). ECG has less debt than FLR: ECG (363M) vs FLR (1.07B). FLR has higher revenues than ECG: FLR (15.2B) vs ECG (3.96B).
ECGFLRECG / FLR
Capitalization6.51B7.22B90%
EBITDA337M-206M-164%
Gain YTD49.08830.457161%
P/E Ratio29.1923.61124%
Revenue3.96B15.2B26%
Total Cash293M3.67B8%
Total Debt363M1.07B34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLR: Fundamental Ratings
FLR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
42
SMR RATING
1..100
69
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECGFLR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IOTX.X0.0023840.000072
+3.10%
IoTeX cryptocurrency
MIR.X0.002514-0.000032
-1.25%
Mirror Protocol cryptocurrency
GMX.X6.769230-0.141069
-2.04%
GMX cryptocurrency
BAR.X0.270196-0.008754
-3.14%
FC Barcelona Fan Token cryptocurrency
SUI.X0.680455-0.041834
-5.79%
Sui cryptocurrency

ECG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECG has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECG jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECG
1D Price
Change %
ECG100%
-1.87%
FIX - ECG
70%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
STRL - ECG
68%
Closely correlated
-3.98%
PWR - ECG
67%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
MTZ - ECG
66%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
EME - ECG
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
More

FLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLR has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLR
1D Price
Change %
FLR100%
-0.94%
MTZ - FLR
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
PWR - FLR
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
FIX - FLR
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
APG - FLR
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
ECG - FLR
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
More