Advertisement
ECG vs MTZ
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Everus Construction Group (ECG) vs. MasTec (MTZ) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both ECG and MTZ operate in the engineering and construction sector, benefiting from infrastructure demand, with YTD returns exceeding 95% for each.
- ECG (market cap $8.6B) shows higher profitability margins (5.39%) and ROE (38.34%) compared to MTZ (market cap $34.6B, margins 2.94%, ROE 15.01%).
- Recent quarters saw strong earnings beats: ECG Q1 EPS $1.14 vs. $0.85 est., MTZ Q1 EPS $1.39 vs. $0.99 est., driving share price gains.
- MTZ offers broader diversification across five segments including clean energy, while ECG focuses on two: electrical/mechanical and transmission/distribution.
- Analyst targets imply upside for both, but MTZ at $448 (avg.) vs. current $438, and ECG at $137 vs. current $168.
- Recent catalysts include ECG's SE&M acquisition and MTZ's raised 2026 guidance amid backlog growth.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines ECG (Everus Construction Group) and MTZ (MasTec), two players in the industrials engineering and construction sector amid rising demand for infrastructure upgrades, renewables, and transmission networks. Both have delivered exceptional relative performance in recent market activity, fueled by strong quarterly results and positive analyst sentiment. Traders seeking momentum in cyclical sectors or investors eyeing long-term infrastructure trends may find value in evaluating their business models, recent momentum, and risk profiles side-by-side for informed positioning.
ECG Overview and Recent Performance
Everus Construction Group, Inc. (ECG) is a construction solutions provider specializing in electrical and mechanical services, as well as transmission and distribution infrastructure across the U.S. Operating through two segments—Electrical & Mechanical (E&M, majority revenue) and Transmission & Distribution (T&D)—it serves utilities, industrials, and government clients with wiring, fire suppression, piping, and line construction.
In recent market activity, ECG shares have surged, hitting new 52-week highs near $169 with YTD gains over 96%. Q1 2026 results topped estimates, with revenue at $1.04B and EPS of $1.14 (vs. $0.85 expected), reflecting robust backlog growth and execution. Key influences include a $158M acquisition of SE&M Constructors expanding Southeast MEP (mechanical, electrical, plumbing) presence, alongside analyst upgrades like Guggenheim's Buy rating. Positive sentiment stems from record backlogs, earnings beats, and sector tailwinds in grid modernization, though elevated valuations (trailing P/E 42.5) warrant monitoring.
MTZ Overview and Recent Performance
MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) delivers infrastructure engineering and construction services across communications, clean energy, power delivery, pipeline, and other segments, primarily in the U.S. and Canada. It supports wireless/fiber networks, renewables, transmission lines, pipelines, and civil projects for utilities, energy firms, and governments.
MTZ stock has exhibited strong upward momentum in recent weeks, approaching $438 with YTD returns around 101%. Q1 2026 earnings exceeded forecasts, posting $3.83B revenue (up 34.5% YoY) and EPS $1.39 (vs. $0.99 est.), prompting raised full-year guidance. Developments like EPC partnerships for utility-scale solar and analyst price target hikes (e.g., Mizuho to $498) have bolstered confidence. Performance drivers include surging backlogs from infrastructure spending and clean energy demand, offset by higher debt levels (debt/equity 88%) and a premium valuation (trailing P/E 76.8).
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the top 25 AI trading bots from its library of 351 bots, optimized for current market conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend-following, AI/ML pattern recognition, take-profit/stop-loss corridors (e.g., TP 3%/SL 2%), and multi-agent systems, trading 1-18 tickers in sectors such as semiconductors, data centers, and industrials. Performance highlights include annualized returns from +23% to +169%, win rates of 51%-88%, and profit factors up to 11.7, often outperforming the S&P 500 over recent months or quarters. With timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 days, they cater to various styles—Signal Agents for alerts, Virtual Agents for simulated risk management, and Brokerage Agents for automated execution. Explore these high-performing bots to enhance your trading edge in volatile conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ECG and MTZ share sector exposure to infrastructure but diverge in scale and diversification: MTZ's five segments provide broader revenue streams, including clean energy and pipelines, versus ECG's focused E&M/T&D model. Growth drivers favor both amid grid and renewables spending, yet MTZ boasts larger TTM revenue ($15.3B vs. $3.75B) and backlog scale.
Recent momentum is comparable, with YTD gains over 95% and post-earnings rallies, but ECG edges on profitability (5.4% margins, 38% ROE vs. MTZ's 2.9%/15%). Risk factors include MTZ's higher leverage (debt/equity 88% vs. 59%) and beta (1.82 vs. 1.43), amplifying volatility. Market sentiment tilts positive for both, with Strong Buy leanings, though MTZ commands a higher multiple reflecting its diversification trade-off against ECG's efficiency.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors MTZ for its superior scale, diversified growth catalysts in clean energy and power delivery, and sustained backlog momentum amid infrastructure tailwinds. While ECG exhibits stronger margins and recent technical strength, MTZ's trend consistency and broader positioning suggest a higher probability of outperformance in the prevailing environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECG is a Hold and MTZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ECG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ECG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MTZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ECG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ECG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MTZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ECG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -5.28% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -3.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.45%.
Reported Earning Dates
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-1.80% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| ECG | MTZ | ECG / MTZ | |
| Capitalization | 8.14B | 33.2B | 25% |
| EBITDA | 337M | 1.22B | 28% |
| Gain YTD | 86.349 | 93.357 | 92% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.49 | 73.61 | 50% |
| Revenue | 3.96B | 15.3B | 26% |
| Total Cash | 293M | 274M | 107% |
| Total Debt | 363M | 3.02B | 12% |
MTZ | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ECG | MTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 64% | 7 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SILJ | 34.18 | 0.40 | +1.18% |
| Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | |||
| RND | 31.48 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF | |||
| TXXI | 50.52 | -0.03 | -0.07% |
| Bondbloxx IR+M Tax-Aware Intermediate Duration ETF | |||
| DFP | 20.91 | -0.04 | -0.19% |
| FLAHERTY & CRUMRINE DYNAMIC PREFERRED AND Income FUND | |||
| MBSD | 20.59 | -0.08 | -0.39% |
| FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS ETF | |||
ECG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECG has been loosely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECG jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECG | 100% | -2.69% | ||
| FIX - ECG | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| STRL - ECG | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| MTZ - ECG | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| PWR - ECG | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| IESC - ECG | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
More | ||||