ECO
Price
$56.37
Change
+$1.38 (+2.51%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:04 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.1B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PSHG
Price
$1.70
Change
-$0.01 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:09 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.26M
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECO vs PSHG

ECO vs PSHG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECO vs. PSHG commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECO is a Buy and PSHG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (ECO: $54.99 vs. PSHG: $1.71)
Brand notoriety: ECO and PSHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECO: 219% vs. PSHG: 77%
Market capitalization -- ECO: $2.1B vs. PSHG: $21.26M
ECO [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $2.1B. PSHG’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $21.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.28B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePSHG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ECO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PSHG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECO is a better buy in the long-term than PSHG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSHG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PSHG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ECO is a better buy in the short-term than PSHG.

Price Growth

ECO (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +3.38% price change this week, while PSHG (@Marine Shipping) price change was -7.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECO is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

PSHG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-0.59% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECO($2.11B) has a higher market cap than PSHG($21.3M). ECO has higher P/E ratio than PSHG: ECO (9.66) vs PSHG (2.19). ECO YTD gains are higher at: 74.027 vs. PSHG (-19.718). ECO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 283M vs. PSHG (42M). PSHG (127M) and ECO (126M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . PSHG has less debt than ECO: PSHG (225M) vs ECO (683M). ECO has higher revenues than PSHG: ECO (482M) vs PSHG (96.6M).
ECOPSHGECO / PSHG
Capitalization2.11B21.3M9,883%
EBITDA283M42M674%
Gain YTD74.027-19.718-375%
P/E Ratio9.662.19441%
Revenue482M96.6M499%
Total Cash126M127M99%
Total Debt683M225M304%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECO vs PSHG: Fundamental Ratings
ECO
PSHG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2086
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7100
SMR RATING
1..100
2775
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3872
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4913
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ECO's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as PSHG (19). This means that ECO’s stock grew similarly to PSHG’s over the last 12 months.

ECO's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PSHG (100). This means that ECO’s stock grew significantly faster than PSHG’s over the last 12 months.

ECO's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSHG (75). This means that ECO’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSHG’s over the last 12 months.

ECO's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSHG (72). This means that ECO’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSHG’s over the last 12 months.

PSHG's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECO (49). This means that PSHG’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECOPSHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PSHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SARK27.810.57
+2.09%
Tradr 1X Short Innovation Daily ETF
RSPF77.230.26
+0.34%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Fincl ETF
IEV72.37-0.03
-0.04%
iShares Europe ETF
AFGE15.87-0.06
-0.38%
American Financial Group
IMST8.03-0.27
-3.31%
Bitwise MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF

ECO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with NAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then NAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECO
1D Price
Change %
ECO100%
+4.78%
NAT - ECO
73%
Closely correlated
+6.15%
HAFN - ECO
69%
Closely correlated
+4.98%
ASC - ECO
67%
Closely correlated
+2.87%
NMM - ECO
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.39%
BWLP - ECO
50%
Loosely correlated
+4.59%
More

PSHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSHG and GASS have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSHG and GASS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSHG
1D Price
Change %
PSHG100%
+1.79%
GASS - PSHG
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
SHIP - PSHG
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
DSX - PSHG
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
NAT - PSHG
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.15%
ECO - PSHG
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.78%
More