EIPAF
Price
$16.70
Change
-$0.55 (-3.19%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
52.29B
TGS
Price
$26.44
Change
-$0.11 (-0.41%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.98B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EIPAF vs TGS

Header iconEIPAF vs TGS Comparison
Open Charts EIPAF vs TGSBanner chart's image
ENI S.p.A
Price$16.70
Change-$0.55 (-3.19%)
Volume$2.02K
Capitalization52.29B
Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA
Price$26.44
Change-$0.11 (-0.41%)
Volume$522.83K
Capitalization3.98B
EIPAF vs TGS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EIPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EIPAF vs. TGS commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIPAF is a Hold and TGS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EIPAF: $16.70 vs. TGS: $26.44)
Brand notoriety: EIPAF and TGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EIPAF: 305% vs. TGS: 136%
Market capitalization -- EIPAF: $52.29B vs. TGS: $3.98B
EIPAF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $52.29B. TGS’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $3.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $465.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $56.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EIPAF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EIPAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EIPAF is a better buy in the long-term than TGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EIPAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EIPAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TGS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EIPAF is a better buy in the short-term than TGS.

Price Growth

EIPAF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -3.24% price change this week, while TGS (@Integrated Oil) price change was -2.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

TGS is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-2.54% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EIPAF($52.3B) has a higher market cap than TGS($3.98B). EIPAF has higher P/E ratio than TGS: EIPAF (19.36) vs TGS (17.36). EIPAF YTD gains are higher at: 26.900 vs. TGS (-6.423). TGS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 674B vs. EIPAF (24.3B). TGS has more cash in the bank: 676B vs. EIPAF (16.6B). EIPAF has less debt than TGS: EIPAF (34.9B) vs TGS (674B). TGS has higher revenues than EIPAF: TGS (1.21T) vs EIPAF (85.5B).
EIPAFTGSEIPAF / TGS
Capitalization52.3B3.98B1,314%
EBITDA24.3B674B4%
Gain YTD26.900-6.423-419%
P/E Ratio19.3617.36111%
Revenue85.5B1.21T7%
Total Cash16.6B676B2%
Total Debt34.9B674B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EIPAF vs TGS: Fundamental Ratings
EIPAF
TGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8558
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3223
SMR RATING
1..100
8651
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5256
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1390
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EIPAF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as TGS (53) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that EIPAF’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as EIPAF (32) in the null industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew similarly to EIPAF’s over the last 12 months.

TGS's SMR Rating (51) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EIPAF (86) in the null industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than EIPAF’s over the last 12 months.

EIPAF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as TGS (56) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that EIPAF’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

EIPAF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TGS (90) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that EIPAF’s stock grew significantly faster than TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EIPAFTGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EIPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCG3.910.24
+6.54%
Oriental Culture Holding Ltd
WOW5.140.06
+1.18%
WideOpenWest
HAO1.140.01
+0.88%
Haoxi Health Technology Limited
SDRL32.760.02
+0.06%
Seadrill Limited
TXRH168.85-0.52
-0.31%
Texas Roadhouse

EIPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EIPAF and GLPEF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EIPAF and GLPEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EIPAF
1D Price
Change %
EIPAF100%
-3.19%
GLPEF - EIPAF
5%
Poorly correlated
-7.85%
BPAQF - EIPAF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
NFG - EIPAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
SLNG - EIPAF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-7.08%
TGS - EIPAF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
More