EC
Price
$16.77
Change
-$0.27 (-1.58%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
33.41B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TGS
Price
$31.83
Change
+$0.41 (+1.30%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
4.79B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EC vs TGS

EC vs TGS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EC vs. TGS commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EC is a Hold and TGS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (EC: $16.77 vs. TGS: $31.83)
Brand notoriety: EC and TGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EC: 75% vs. TGS: 70%
Market capitalization -- EC: $33.41B vs. TGS: $4.79B
EC [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $33.41B. TGS’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $4.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $644.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $130.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EC is a better buy in the long-term than TGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGS’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TGS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TGS is a better buy in the short-term than EC.

Price Growth

EC (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +4.75% price change this week, while TGS (@Integrated Oil) price change was +4.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

EC is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

TGS is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+2.41% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EC($33.4B) has a higher market cap than TGS($4.79B). TGS has higher P/E ratio than EC: TGS (16.34) vs EC (11.06). EC YTD gains are higher at: 84.693 vs. TGS (2.380). EC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 28.04T vs. TGS (1.01T). EC has higher revenues than TGS: EC (116.95T) vs TGS (1.76T).
ECTGSEC / TGS
Capitalization33.4B4.79B697%
EBITDA28.04T1.01T2,787%
Gain YTD84.6932.3803,558%
P/E Ratio11.0616.3468%
Revenue116.95T1.76T6,630%
Total CashN/A1.81T-
Total DebtN/A1.57T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EC vs TGS: Fundamental Ratings
EC
TGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9514
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
118
SMR RATING
1..100
2451
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1034
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EC's Valuation (37) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TGS (58) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

EC's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TGS (18) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

EC's SMR Rating (24) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TGS (51) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

EC's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TGS (45) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

EC's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TGS (34) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECTGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QBY6.690.02
+0.36%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF
AOHY10.96N/A
+0.04%
Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF
MHD11.47-0.07
-0.61%
Blackrock Muniholdings Fund
IQLT50.17-0.41
-0.81%
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
ODDS25.10-0.47
-1.82%
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF

EC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EC has been loosely correlated with CRGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EC jumps, then CRGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EC
1D Price
Change %
EC100%
-1.58%
CRGY - EC
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.69%
E - EC
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EQNR - EC
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
BP - EC
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
SU - EC
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
More

TGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGS has been closely correlated with YPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TGS jumps, then YPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGS
1D Price
Change %
TGS100%
+1.30%
YPF - TGS
85%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
CRGY - TGS
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.69%
PBR - TGS
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
EC - TGS
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
CVE - TGS
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
More