It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ELV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMOH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ELV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ELV (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а +5.30% price change this week, while MOH (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was +6.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +4.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.10%.
ELV is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.
MOH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
ELV | MOH | ELV / MOH | |
Capitalization | 69.7B | 9.08B | 768% |
EBITDA | N/A | 1.85B | - |
Gain YTD | -15.360 | -42.453 | 36% |
P/E Ratio | 13.13 | 8.26 | 159% |
Revenue | 189B | 43.4B | 435% |
Total Cash | 33.9B | 8.81B | 385% |
Total Debt | 30.2B | 3.56B | 848% |
ELV | MOH | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 66 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ELV's Valuation (28) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOH (82). This means that ELV’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOH’s over the last 12 months.
ELV's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as MOH (100). This means that ELV’s stock grew similarly to MOH’s over the last 12 months.
MOH's SMR Rating (40) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELV (99). This means that MOH’s stock grew somewhat faster than ELV’s over the last 12 months.
ELV's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as MOH (66). This means that ELV’s stock grew similarly to MOH’s over the last 12 months.
ELV's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as MOH (96). This means that ELV’s stock grew similarly to MOH’s over the last 12 months.
ELV | MOH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago62% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 3 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago56% | 10 days ago63% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 1 day ago68% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago48% | 1 day ago54% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
VVR | 3.64 | 0.01 | +0.28% |
Invesco Senior Income Trust | |||
PDI | 19.20 | 0.05 | +0.26% |
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund | |||
EVG | 11.33 | 0.01 | +0.13% |
Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund | |||
QCAP | 23.09 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Apr | |||
WBIF | 30.15 | N/A | N/A |
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOH has been closely correlated with CNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOH jumps, then CNC could also see price increases.