EMA
Price
$51.62
Change
-$0.66 (-1.26%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
15.89B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SO
Price
$92.55
Change
-$1.13 (-1.21%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
104.33B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMA vs SO

Header iconEMA vs SO Comparison
Open Charts EMA vs SOBanner chart's image
EMA vs SO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Emera Incorporated (EMA) vs. The Southern Company (SO) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both EMA and SO operate in the regulated utilities sector, offering stable dividends with yields around 4% for EMA and 3.1% for SO.
  • SO shows stronger year-to-date performance at approximately 11%, outpacing EMA's 8% amid recent market activity.
  • SO benefits from robust demand growth, including 42% rise in data center usage, driving Q1 2026 earnings beats.
  • EMA maintains geographic diversity across North America and the Caribbean, with a $20 billion capital plan supporting 7-8% rate base growth through 2030.
  • SO has a larger market cap of $109B versus EMA's $16B, reflecting greater scale but similar high debt-to-equity ratios around 160-190%.
  • Recent analyst actions include initiations and target raises for both, with neutral to positive sentiment in a defensive sector environment.

Introduction

Emera Incorporated (EMA) and The Southern Company (SO) represent prominent players in the regulated electric utilities sector, providing essential power generation, transmission, and distribution services. This comparison is particularly relevant for income-focused investors and traders seeking defensive positions amid market volatility, as both offer reliable dividends and exposure to steady demand for electricity. With rising energy needs from data centers and electrification trends, evaluating their relative performance, growth drivers, and risk profiles helps assess positioning in the current environment. Key metrics highlight contrasts in scale, recent momentum, and sector catalysts.

EMA Overview and Recent Performance

Emera Incorporated (EMA), headquartered in Halifax, Canada, is a geographically diverse energy company investing in electricity generation, transmission, distribution, and gas utilities across the U.S., Canada, Barbados, and the Bahamas. Its operations include key segments like Florida Electric Utility and Canadian Electric Utilities, serving millions through regulated assets.

In recent market activity, EMA stock has traded around $52.50, with a 52-week range of $41.90-$54.06 and year-to-date gains of about 8%, supported by a 4% dividend yield. Sentiment has been influenced by leadership transitions, including COO retirement and CEO appointment, alongside a $20 billion five-year capital plan targeting 7-8% rate base growth. The company announced note redemptions and dividend declarations, reinforcing stability. Quarterly revenue grew 13.8% year-over-year, though earnings dipped, amid a P/E ratio (TTM) of 21.45 and beta of 0.46 indicating lower volatility. High debt-to-equity (161%) reflects capital-intensive utility norms, with analysts like Barclays initiating Equal Weight coverage.

SO Overview and Recent Performance

The Southern Company (SO), based in Atlanta, Georgia, is one of the largest U.S. utilities, serving 9 million customers across Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and beyond through vertically integrated electric operations and natural gas distribution. It owns 46 GW of regulated capacity and pursues net-zero emissions by 2050.

Recent weeks have seen SO shares near $96, within a 52-week range of $83.09-$100.84, delivering year-to-date returns of around 11% and a 3.1% dividend yield. Strong Q1 2026 results featured adjusted EPS of $1.32 (beating estimates), 8% revenue growth to $8.4B, and 42% data center load increase, boosting sentiment. A 2.7% dividend hike extended its growth streak. With a P/E (TTM) of 24.73, beta of 0.36, and debt-to-equity at 190%, SO exhibits defensive traits amplified by AI-driven demand. Analysts raised targets, e.g., Mizuho to $105, amid positive earnings momentum.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only those excelling in current conditions—based on metrics like annualized returns up to +162%, win rates of 50-88%, profit factors of 1.5-7+, and trades spanning minutes to weeks—earn a spot among the 25 showcased out of 351 total bots. These employ diverse strategies, from trend-following and volatility plays in semiconductors/data centers to multi-ticker corridor exits (e.g., TP 3%/SL 2%), with risk-adjusted ratios often exceeding 5:1. Traders can copy signals in real-time via paper or live brokerage accounts. Explore these adaptable tools to enhance your strategy in volatile markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

EMA and SO share regulated utility models focused on electric and gas infrastructure, but differ in scale and exposure. SO's massive $109B market cap dwarfs EMA's $16B, enabling broader operations but higher absolute debt. Growth drivers contrast: SO leverages U.S. Southeast data center boom, while EMA emphasizes Florida and Canadian expansion via its capital plan.

Recent momentum favors SO with superior YTD returns and earnings beats, versus EMA's steady but less dynamic gains. Risk factors include similar high leverage (debt/equity ~160-190%), regulatory hurdles, and interest rate sensitivity, though both low betas (0.36-0.46) signal stability. Sector-wise, both tap electrification, but SO has stronger AI/data center tailwinds. Sentiment tilts positive for SO post-earnings, while EMA benefits from diversification trade-offs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SO due to consistent trend strength, recent earnings catalysts from data center demand, and superior relative YTD positioning in a growth-oriented utility landscape. EMA offers compelling yield and diversification, but SO's scale and momentum suggest higher probability of near-term outperformance, barring shifts in rates or regulation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
EMA vs. SO commentary
May 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMA is a Hold and SO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 18, 2026
Stock price -- (EMA: $51.62 vs. SO: $92.55)
Brand notoriety: EMA: Not notable vs. SO: Notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMA: 57% vs. SO: 154%
Market capitalization -- EMA: $15.89B vs. SO: $104.33B
EMA [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $15.89B. SO’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $104.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $194.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $24.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SO is a better buy in the long-term than EMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SO is a better buy in the short-term than EMA.

Price Growth

EMA (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -1.86% price change this week, while SO (@Electric Utilities) price change was +0.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMA is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.

SO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-0.83% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SO($104B) has a higher market cap than EMA($15.9B). SO has higher P/E ratio than EMA: SO (23.67) vs EMA (21.64). SO YTD gains are higher at: 6.969 vs. EMA (4.833). SO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.5B vs. EMA (3.51B). EMA has more cash in the bank: 2.46B vs. SO (981M). EMA has less debt than SO: EMA (24B) vs SO (76B). SO has higher revenues than EMA: SO (30.2B) vs EMA (8.91B).
EMASOEMA / SO
Capitalization15.9B104B15%
EBITDA3.51B14.5B24%
Gain YTD4.8336.96969%
P/E Ratio21.6423.6791%
Revenue8.91B30.2B30%
Total Cash2.46B981M250%
Total Debt24B76B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMA vs SO: Fundamental Ratings
EMA
SO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6965
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7919
SMR RATING
1..100
7763
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5154
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4235
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMA's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SO (63) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to SO’s over the last 12 months.

SO's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMA (79) in the null industry. This means that SO’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMA’s over the last 12 months.

SO's SMR Rating (63) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as EMA (77) in the null industry. This means that SO’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.

EMA's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SO (54) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to SO’s over the last 12 months.

SO's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as EMA (42) in the null industry. This means that SO’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMASO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSFW29.670.95
+3.31%
Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay ETF
JHDV43.63N/A
N/A
JHancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
MLN17.39-0.16
-0.91%
VanEck Long Muni ETF
CURE87.13-2.89
-3.21%
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3X ETF
SOXL164.18-22.01
-11.82%
Direxion Daily Semicondct Bull 3X ETF

EMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMA has been loosely correlated with ED. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMA jumps, then ED could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMA
1D Price
Change %
EMA100%
-1.26%
ED - EMA
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.65%
DUK - EMA
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
FTS - EMA
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.07%
OGE - EMA
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
WEC - EMA
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
More

SO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SO has been closely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SO jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SO
1D Price
Change %
SO100%
-1.21%
DUK - SO
83%
Closely correlated
-1.86%
CMS - SO
75%
Closely correlated
-2.21%
AEE - SO
75%
Closely correlated
-2.96%
WEC - SO
73%
Closely correlated
-2.22%
PNW - SO
73%
Closely correlated
-1.37%
More