Advertisement
ED vs EMA
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Emera (EMA) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both ED and EMA operate as rate-regulated utilities with stable cash flows and attractive dividend yields in the 3-4% range.
- ED focuses on electric and gas distribution in the northeastern U.S., while EMA maintains a broader North American footprint including recent asset optimization through divestitures.
- Recent market activity shows ED trading near $109 with year-to-date gains exceeding broad market benchmarks, supported by upcoming quarterly earnings.
- EMA has benefited from regulatory approvals on strategic sales, contributing to positive relative performance in recent weeks amid steady dividend declarations.
- Sector exposure for both centers on regulated utilities, exposing them to interest rate sensitivity and infrastructure investment needs, with differences in geographic and operational scale.
- Market sentiment remains constructive for dividend-focused utilities, though relative momentum varies with individual company catalysts and regulatory environments.
Introduction
Consolidated Edison (ED) and Emera (EMA) represent two established players in the regulated utilities sector. Investors and traders often compare such names when seeking defensive exposure, income generation through dividends, or diversification within energy infrastructure. This analysis examines their business profiles, recent price behavior, and key differentiators to assist those evaluating relative positioning in the current market environment characterized by evolving interest rates and energy demand trends.
ED Overview and Recent Performance
Consolidated Edison, Inc. provides electric, gas, and steam services primarily in New York and New Jersey. The company maintains a rate-regulated model that supports predictable earnings and consistent dividend growth. In recent market activity, ED shares have traded around the $109 level following modest pullbacks, with year-to-date returns outpacing the broader market. Sentiment has been influenced by anticipation of second-quarter results scheduled for early August, alongside ongoing infrastructure investments and a declared quarterly dividend of 88.75 cents per share. Broader utility sector dynamics, including regulatory rate cases and energy transition spending, continue to shape performance.
EMA Overview and Recent Performance
Emera Incorporated operates a portfolio of rate-regulated electric and natural gas utilities across North America. The company emphasizes cost-of-service models that deliver stable returns. Recent market activity for EMA reflects steady trading near recent highs on both Toronto and New York exchanges, supported by final regulatory approval for the sale of its New Mexico Gas Company subsidiary and a quarterly dividend declaration. Year-to-date gains have remained constructive, with performance tied to asset optimization efforts and consistent dividend policies amid typical utility sector influences such as interest rate movements and regional demand patterns.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots drawn from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of historical win rates, average returns per trade, and risk parameters, allowing users to explore options suited to different trading styles. The platform provides transparent statistics on each bot’s track record. Explore the Trending AI Robots page for detailed insights into current offerings.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both companies follow regulated utility business models focused on essential services, yet ED maintains a concentrated northeastern U.S. presence while EMA operates across multiple Canadian and U.S. jurisdictions. Growth drivers for ED center on grid modernization and rate-base expansion, whereas EMA has pursued portfolio streamlining through recent divestitures. Recent momentum shows both names delivering positive year-to-date results, though ED exhibits slightly higher visibility around near-term earnings. Risk factors include regulatory lag and interest-rate sensitivity for each, with EMA carrying additional currency considerations due to its Canadian base. Market sentiment favors both for income-oriented portfolios, with trade-offs evident in geographic diversification versus operational concentration.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings visibility, and recent catalysts, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest edge to ED due to its upcoming earnings release and established rate-base growth trajectory. EMA remains competitively positioned through successful asset transactions. Any preference remains probabilistic and subject to ongoing market developments rather than a definitive ranking.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ED is a Hold and EMA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ED’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEMA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ED’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- EMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ED’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ED’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- EMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ED (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -0.50% price change this week, while EMA (@Electric Utilities) price change was -1.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
ED is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
EMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (+0.24% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| ED | EMA | ED / EMA | |
| Capitalization | 40.1B | 15.8B | 254% |
| EBITDA | 6.35B | 3.51B | 181% |
| Gain YTD | 10.286 | 3.513 | 293% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.83 | 22.69 | 79% |
| Revenue | 17.2B | 8.91B | 193% |
| Total Cash | 147M | 2.46B | 6% |
| Total Debt | 27.2B | 24B | 113% |
ED | EMA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ED's Valuation (32) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as EMA (33) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.
ED's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMA (83) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMA’s over the last 12 months.
ED's SMR Rating (76) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as EMA (78) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.
ED's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as EMA (59) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.
EMA's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as ED (57) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
| ED | EMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 21 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 42% | 9 days ago 39% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 24% | 2 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
ED and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.
EMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMA has been closely correlated with FTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMA jumps, then FTS could also see price increases.