Advertisement
ED vs EMA
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Emera (EMA) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- ED boasts a larger market cap of $40.39B compared to EMA's $16.07B, reflecting greater scale in regulated utilities.
- Year-to-date, ED has returned 11.25%, outperforming EMA's 7.61%, amid stable demand in New York markets.
- EMA offers a higher dividend yield at 4.04% versus ED's 3.17%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- Both stocks trade at similar P/E ratios around 19-21, with ED showing stronger quarterly revenue growth of 8.90%.
- Upcoming earnings for ED on May 7 and EMA on May 8 could influence near-term sentiment.
- Sector tailwinds in utilities support defensive positioning for both amid market volatility.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines ED (Consolidated Edison, Inc.) and EMA (Emera Incorporated), two established players in the regulated electric utilities sector. Both companies deliver essential electricity, gas, and related services, benefiting from stable cash flows and dividend reliability. Investors seeking defensive holdings with income potential, particularly in uncertain market environments, may find value in evaluating their relative performance, financial metrics, and growth drivers. This analysis highlights key contrasts in scale, yields, and recent market positioning to aid informed decision-making in stock comparison and portfolio allocation.
ED Overview and Recent Performance
ED, a holding company primarily serving New York City and Westchester County, provides regulated electric, gas, and steam delivery to over 3.7 million electric customers. Its business model emphasizes infrastructure reliability amid urban density and weather challenges. In recent market activity, ED shares have traded around $109.63, within a 52-week range of $94.96-$116.23. Year-to-date gains of 11.25% have outpaced the S&P 500's 5.19%, driven by steady demand and a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). Sentiment has been bolstered by a recent quarterly dividend declaration of $0.8875 per share and projections for 6-7% EPS growth over five years. Upcoming Q1 earnings on May 7 anticipate $2.32 EPS and $4.95B revenue, up 3.1% year-over-year. However, recent share price weakness and analyst bearish notes, like Bank of America's lifted target with caution, reflect regulatory and rate case pressures influencing performance.
EMA Overview and Recent Performance
EMA, a geographically diverse energy firm, operates electric and gas utilities across the U.S., Canada, and the Caribbean, with key assets like Tampa Electric and Nova Scotia Power. Its portfolio balances regulated operations with transmission investments. Shares recently hovered near $52.54, in a 52-week range of $41.90-$54.06. Year-to-date returns stand at 7.61%, trailing peers but supported by resilient Florida demand. Recent developments include quarterly dividend declarations and Barclays' Equal-Weight initiation at $53 on April 28. Q1 earnings are slated for May 8, amid analyst targets averaging $62.50. Performance reflects quarterly revenue growth of 13.80%, though higher debt/equity (161.12%) and quarterly earnings decline (-49.70%) have tempered momentum. Stable leadership transitions and preferred share dividend announcements have sustained investor interest in recent weeks.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors. Only the most promising ones, suited to current market conditions like volatility in tech and energy, earn a spot in this dynamic lineup—currently showcasing 25 bots with annualized returns ranging from +23% to +162%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors up to 11.70. These bots employ advanced pattern recognition, momentum, and sector rotation, excelling in areas like semiconductors, industrials, and ETFs. Traders can explore real-time signals for copy trading. Visit Trending AI Robots to review stats and potentially enhance strategies with AI-driven insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ED and EMA share regulated utility models but differ in scale and geography: ED's urban New York focus yields higher ROE (8.77%) and positive operating cash flow ($4.8B), while EMA's North American/Caribbean spread offers diversification but higher leverage (Debt/Equity 161% vs. 117%). Growth drivers contrast with ED's 8.90% quarterly revenue rise versus EMA's 13.80%, though EMA faces earnings volatility. Recent momentum favors ED YTD, but EMA shines over one year (22.23%). Risk factors include regulatory hurdles for both, with ED exposed to NYC rates and EMA to regional weather. Market sentiment leans positive on ED's dividend stability versus EMA's yield edge, positioning them as complementary defensive plays.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors ED due to superior YTD momentum, stronger balance sheet metrics like ROE and cash flow, and consistent trend stability in recent weeks. Observable factors such as outperforming utilities peers and upcoming earnings catalysts suggest higher probability of relative upside, though EMA's yield and diversification provide trade-offs for income strategies.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ED is a StrongBuy and EMA is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ED’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEMA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- EMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ED’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ED’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- EMA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
ED (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +1.39% price change this week, while EMA (@Electric Utilities) price change was +1.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
ED is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
EMA is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (+0.73% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| ED | EMA | ED / EMA | |
| Capitalization | 39.7B | 16.1B | 247% |
| EBITDA | 6.35B | 3.51B | 181% |
| Gain YTD | 10.245 | 6.742 | 152% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.17 | 22.42 | 81% |
| Revenue | 17.2B | 8.91B | 193% |
| Total Cash | 147M | 2.46B | 6% |
| Total Debt | 27.2B | 24B | 113% |
ED | EMA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EMA's Valuation (34) in the null industry is in the same range as ED (42) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
ED's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMA (80) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMA’s over the last 12 months.
ED's SMR Rating (77) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as EMA (79) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.
ED's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as EMA (52) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.
EMA's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as ED (58) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
| ED | EMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 54% | 5 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 42% | 14 days ago 39% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 29% | N/A |
Advertisement
ED and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.
EMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMA has been closely correlated with FTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMA jumps, then FTS could also see price increases.