ENGS saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on September 24, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 26 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 25 of the 26 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 90%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ENGS just turned positive on September 23, 2026. Looking at past instances where ENGS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 6 of 9 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
ENGS moved above its 50-day moving average on September 21, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for ENGS crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on September 18, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 3 of 3 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Following a +3.87% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ENGS advanced for three days, in 85 of 93 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 85 of 92 cases where ENGS Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 90%.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 10 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 17 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
ENGS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 16, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. ENGS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 96 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: ENGS's P/B Ratio (909.091) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (47.489). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (49.821). ENGS's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.132). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.015) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.099) is also within normal values, averaging (72.867).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. ENGS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 78, placing this stock worse than average.
The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
Following a +2.59% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where QRHC advanced for three days, in 150 of 231 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
QRHC may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on QRHC as a result. In 83 of 107 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for QRHC turned negative on October 13, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 48 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 32 of the 48 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 67%.
QRHC moved below its 50-day moving average on October 06, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for QRHC crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 30, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QRHC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.
The Aroon Indicator for QRHC entered a downward trend on October 01, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 23 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.890) is normal, around the industry mean (47.489). P/E Ratio (-1.378) is within average values for comparable stocks, (49.821). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.706) is also within normal values, averaging (1.132). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.015) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.118) is also within normal values, averaging (72.867).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 25 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. QRHC’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. QRHC’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 78, placing this stock worse than average.
QRHC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ENGS | QRHC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ENGS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while QRHC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ENGS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QRHC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ENGS (@Environmental Services) experienced а +11.90% price change this week, while QRHC (@Environmental Services) price change was -18.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -2.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.60%.
QRHC is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2026.
Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TSSD | 29.32 | 0.19 | +0.66% |
| Truth Social American Security & Defense ETF (TSSD) | |||
| FSML | 28.46 | 0.16 | +0.57% |
| Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF (FSML) | |||
| IBDV | 21.19 | -0.05 | -0.24% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF (IBDV) | |||
| BLW | 11.48 | -0.04 | -0.35% |
| Blackrock Limited | |||
| GIEQ | 41.05 | -0.21 | -0.52% |
| Goldman Sachs Data Enhanced International Equity ETF (GIEQ) | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that ENGS and GFL have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ENGS and GFL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENGS | 100% | +0.27% | ||
| GFL - ENGS | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.89% | ||
| AQMS - ENGS | 5% Poorly correlated | -12.94% | ||
| YDDL - ENGS | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QRHC - ENGS | 0% Poorly correlated | -1.74% | ||
| ABAT - ENGS | -0% Poorly correlated | -2.03% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that QRHC and NVRI have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QRHC and NVRI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QRHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QRHC | 100% | -1.74% | ||
| NVRI - QRHC | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| CWST - QRHC | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.66% | ||
| PESI - QRHC | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.03% | ||
| ONT - QRHC | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.36% | ||
| ABAT - QRHC | 16% Poorly correlated | -2.03% | ||
More | ||||