Advertisement
ENGS vs GFL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENGS is a Hold and GFL is a Buy.
ENGS in +2.69% Uptrend, growing for three consecutive days on November 02, 2026
Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where ENGS advanced for three days, in 94 of 102 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 90 of 97 cases where ENGS Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 90%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 22 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 15 of 21 cases where ENGS's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ENGS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
ENGS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 21, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 34 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. ENGS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 96 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: ENGS's P/B Ratio (909.091) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (47.597). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (56.657). ENGS's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.132). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.016) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.099) is also within normal values, averaging (72.867).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. ENGS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 75, placing this stock worse than average.
GFL's MACD Histogram just turned positive
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for GFL turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where GFL's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 39 of 52 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 06, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on GFL as a result. In 61 of 89 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
Following a +2.27% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GFL advanced for three days, in 173 of 277 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 163 of 223 cases where GFL Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 73%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 4 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GFL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.
GFL broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 23, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 4 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.745) is normal, around the industry mean (47.597). P/E Ratio (-98.553) is within average values for comparable stocks, (56.657). GFL's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.132). Dividend Yield (0.001) settles around the average of (0.016) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.988) is also within normal values, averaging (72.867).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 40 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. GFL’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 74 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. GFL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 75, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
GFL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ENGS | GFL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 6 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 73% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ENGS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while GFL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ENGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ENGS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ENGS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- GFL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ENGS (@Environmental Services) experienced а +4.86% price change this week, while GFL (@Environmental Services) price change was +2.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +6.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.16%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Environmental Services (+6.69% weekly)Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
Advertisement
ENGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ENGS and GFL have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ENGS and GFL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENGS | 100% | -0.84% | ||
| GFL - ENGS | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.95% | ||
| AQMS - ENGS | 5% Poorly correlated | +12.78% | ||
| AWX - ENGS | 5% Poorly correlated | +8.24% | ||
| AREC - ENGS | 4% Poorly correlated | +7.34% | ||
| ONT - ENGS | 4% Poorly correlated | +7.62% | ||
More | ||||
GFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| COWS | 41.08 | 0.81 | +2.02% |
| Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) | |||
| REET | 27.36 | 0.41 | +1.52% |
| iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) | |||
| NNY | 8.03 | 0.07 | +0.88% |
| Nuveen New York Municipal Value Fund | |||
| ALRG | 30.28 | N/A | N/A |
| Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) | |||
| NFLT | 22.42 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) | |||