Advertisement
EOG vs WDS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? EOG Resources (EOG) vs. Woodside Energy Group (WDS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- EOG offers a larger market capitalization of approximately $71 billion and lower beta of 0.33 (a measure of stock volatility relative to the market), indicating greater stability.
- WDS has delivered stronger year-to-date (YTD) performance at 52.49% compared to EOG's 28.98%, driven by robust production records.
- Both stocks benefit from elevated oil prices, but WDS provides a higher dividend yield of 4.86% versus EOG's 3.06%.
- EOG trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 14.60, suggesting relative value, with analyst targets implying upside potential to $155.
- WDS has outperformed EOG over the past 12 months by 48% to 8%, reflecting stronger momentum in recent weeks.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines EOG Resources and WDS (Woodside Energy Group), two prominent players in the energy sector focused on oil and gas production. Investors and traders interested in upstream energy stocks may find value in analyzing their relative performance amid fluctuating commodity prices and geopolitical influences. With both companies exposed to global oil dynamics, this head-to-head review highlights differences in market positioning, recent momentum, and risk profiles to inform portfolio decisions in the current market environment.
EOG Overview and Recent Performance
EOG Resources, Inc. is a leading U.S.-based exploration and production company, primarily operating in shale plays like the Permian Basin. In recent market activity, its stock has hovered around $133 per share, reflecting a year-to-date gain of nearly 29% within a 52-week range of $102 to $152. Sentiment has been supported by higher oil prices prompting an upward revision in first-quarter 2026 tax expenses and a projected free cash flow (FCF, excess cash after capital expenditures) of $4.5 billion for the full year. Technical indicators show a neutral stance with an upward weekly trend, bolstered by moving averages providing support. Investors await first-quarter earnings on May 5, 2026, with adjusted earnings per share (EPS, profitability per share) estimated at $3.01.
WDS Overview and Recent Performance
WDS (Woodside Energy Group Ltd) is an Australian energy firm with a diversified portfolio emphasizing liquefied natural gas (LNG), oil, and gas assets across global operations. Recently, the stock has traded near $23, posting a robust YTD return of 52% within a 52-week range of $13 to $25. Performance has been fueled by record full-year production of 198.8 million barrels of oil equivalent and positive developments like resuming North West Shelf operations, contributing to share price strength in recent weeks. The company's larger dividend yield and exposure to LNG demand have enhanced market sentiment, though specific technical summaries remain mixed amid broader energy trends.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, tailored for copy trading across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots stand out for their adaptability to current market volatility, showcasing annualized returns ranging from +15% to +168%, win rates of 48% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Strategies vary by timeframe—from 5-minute scalps to 55-day holds—and focus on sectors like semiconductors, industrials, and energy, with some handling up to 25 tickers and risk controls like 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss corridors. Exploring these bots offers traders data-driven insights into high-potential patterns; visit the page to evaluate options suited to your style.
Head-to-Head Comparison
EOG emphasizes U.S. shale efficiency with higher revenue ($22.7 billion TTM, trailing twelve months) and profit margins around 22%, contrasting WDS's integrated LNG focus and slightly lower margins at 21%. Growth drivers differ: EOG targets capital discipline and buybacks, while WDS leverages production expansions. Recent momentum favors WDS with superior YTD and 12-month gains, but EOG exhibits lower risk via beta and upcoming catalysts. Both face commodity price volatility and energy transition risks, yet WDS's higher dividend appeals to income seekers, balancing EOG's value-oriented P/E and analyst upside.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor WDS in the current environment due to its superior trend consistency, stronger relative YTD performance, and elevated dividend yield amid LNG demand stability. While EOG offers defensive positioning with low beta and FCF projections, WDS's momentum and catalysts suggest higher probability of near-term outperformance, subject to oil market dynamics.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EOG is a Hold and WDS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EOG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWDS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- EOG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WDS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EOG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EOG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
EOG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -5.01% price change this week, while WDS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -8.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -7.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
EOG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
WDS is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (-7.50% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| EOG | WDS | EOG / WDS | |
| Capitalization | 71B | 38.9B | 183% |
| EBITDA | 11.9B | 9.35B | 127% |
| Gain YTD | 29.097 | 32.503 | 90% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.10 | 14.15 | 93% |
| Revenue | 23.5B | 13B | 181% |
| Total Cash | 3.85B | 5.94B | 65% |
| Total Debt | 8.31B | 13.7B | 61% |
EOG | WDS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WDS's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as EOG (41) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to EOG’s over the last 12 months.
EOG's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as WDS (53) in the null industry. This means that EOG’s stock grew similarly to WDS’s over the last 12 months.
WDS's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as EOG (100) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to EOG’s over the last 12 months.
WDS's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as EOG (51) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to EOG’s over the last 12 months.
WDS's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as EOG (41) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that WDS’s stock grew similarly to EOG’s over the last 12 months.
| EOG | WDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 8 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 61% | 13 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 2 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
WDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been loosely correlated with VET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then VET could also see price increases.