Investors comparing EPR and PINE are effectively weighing two very different approaches to real estate income. Both are real estate investment trusts (REITs), a structure that distributes the bulk of taxable income to shareholders, which tends to attract dividend-focused investors. However, EPR Properties operates a multi-billion-dollar portfolio of experiential properties, while Alpine Income Property Trust manages a much smaller book of single-tenant net-lease retail assets and commercial loans. This stock comparison is most relevant to income investors and traders evaluating relative performance, dividend durability, growth catalysts, and how each company is positioned in the current market environment.
EPR Properties is a specialized REIT focused on "experiential" real estate, including theaters, attractions, and eat-and-play venues, plus a smaller education segment. In recent weeks, the company reported higher first-quarter funds from operations (FFO, a key REIT earnings metric) as adjusted of $1.26 per share, up from $1.19 a year earlier, alongside roughly 5% revenue growth. Management also lifted its 2026 investment guidance, reflecting the $315 million acquisition of a seven-park regional portfolio from Six Flags and, subsequently, a partnership tied to the Netflix House concept. These moves signal confidence in consumer demand for experiences. The stock has outperformed the broader market in the recent period, supported by a monthly dividend and strong portfolio leasing levels.
PINE, or Alpine Income Property Trust, is a small-cap net-lease REIT that owns single-tenant commercial properties across roughly 31 U.S. states and also originates commercial loans. Its portfolio spans approximately 128 properties with occupancy near 99.5%, and a meaningful share of annualized base rent comes from investment-grade tenants. Recent activity has been constructive: the company raised its quarterly dividend, increased 2026 investment guidance, and reported FFO growth of roughly 20% year over year in its latest quarter. The REIT also returned to profitability, reversing prior-year losses. Relative to its size, PINE has delivered strong percentage-based growth, though its smaller scale and more concentrated tenant base present distinct risk considerations.
For traders seeking a data-driven view of names like these, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of automated trading systems. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only a subset earns a place in this featured section, specifically those best suited to current market conditions. Each bot differs in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and the set of tickers it trades, giving users a range of approaches to review. Whether you favor short-term momentum or longer-horizon positioning, exploring the Trending AI Robots can help you identify tools aligned with your objectives.
The most immediate contrast between these two REITs is scale. EPR carries a market capitalization in the multi-billion-dollar range and derives most of its value from experiential assets, making its performance tied to consumer discretionary spending on entertainment and leisure. PINE operates with a market cap well under $1 billion and focuses on essential retail and net-lease income, a model often viewed as more defensive but also more exposed to single-tenant credit concentration.
Growth drivers also diverge. EPR's momentum is anchored in large-scale acquisitions and high-profile tenant partnerships, while PINE's growth stems from a higher-yield investment program combining property buys with commercial loan originations. On risk, EPR faces cyclical exposure to discretionary consumer spending, whereas PINE contends with elevated leverage, measured by net debt to adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), and a smaller tenant pool. Market sentiment has been generally positive for both, though EPR's relative performance reflects larger, more visible catalysts.
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward EPR in the current environment. The combination of consistent trend structure, a sizable and expanding investment pipeline, visible catalysts such as the Six Flags portfolio and Netflix partnership, and a more diversified, highly leased asset base gives EPR a comparatively stronger risk-reward profile. PINE offers compelling growth and a well-covered dividend on a percentage basis, but its smaller scale, higher leverage, and more concentrated exposure introduce greater variability. The assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive, and the relative positioning of either stock could shift with changes in interest rates, consumer trends, or portfolio execution.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The RSI Indicator for EPR moved out of oversold territory on October 08, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 26 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 21 of the 26 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 81%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 31 of 54 cases where EPR's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on EPR as a result. In 45 of 77 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for EPR just turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where EPR's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 23 of 40 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
Following a +2.07% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where EPR advanced for three days, in 212 of 336 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
EPR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where EPR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 54%.
The Aroon Indicator for EPR entered a downward trend on October 19, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. EPR’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 69 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 74 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.809) is normal, around the industry mean (1.829). P/E Ratio (17.369) is within average values for comparable stocks, (27.248). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.620) is also within normal values, averaging (2.612). Dividend Yield (0.023) settles around the average of (0.044) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (6.258) is also within normal values, averaging (5.594).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 80 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
PINE may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 26 of 38 cases where PINE's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where PINE's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 13 of 20 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PINE just turned positive on October 01, 2026. Looking at past instances where PINE's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 27 of 56 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 48%.
Following a +1.64% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PINE advanced for three days, in 138 of 306 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 45%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PINE as a result. In 45 of 97 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 46%.
The 50-day moving average for PINE moved below the 200-day moving average on October 13, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PINE declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 47%.
The Aroon Indicator for PINE entered a downward trend on October 06, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 44 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.910) is normal, around the industry mean (2.673). P/E Ratio (74.435) is within average values for comparable stocks, (34.730). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (12.808). Dividend Yield (0.075) settles around the average of (246.424) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.250) is also within normal values, averaging (6.739).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 51 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 65, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PINE’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
EPR | PINE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PINE's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as EPR (74) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PINE’s stock grew similarly to EPR’s over the last 12 months.
EPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PINE (51) in the null industry. This means that EPR’s stock grew similarly to PINE’s over the last 12 months.
EPR's SMR Rating (69) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PINE (89) in the null industry. This means that EPR’s stock grew similarly to PINE’s over the last 12 months.
PINE's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as EPR (57) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PINE’s stock grew similarly to EPR’s over the last 12 months.
PINE's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as EPR (80) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PINE’s stock grew similarly to EPR’s over the last 12 months.
| EPR | PINE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 63% | 7 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 54% | about 1 month ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 40% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PINE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PINE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
EPR (@Specialty Telecommunications) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while PINE (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -2.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.05%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.61%.
EPR is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
PINE is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+2.34% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINE has been loosely correlated with GLPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINE jumps, then GLPI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PINE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINE | 100% | -3.28% | ||
| GLPI - PINE | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| STAG - PINE | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| NXRT - PINE | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.22% | ||
| DOC - PINE | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| EPR - PINE | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SOXQ | 90.53 | 1.76 | +1.98% |
| Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) | |||
| KVLE | 27.98 | 0.11 | +0.39% |
| KraneShares Value Line Dynamic Dividend Equity Index ETF (KVLE) | |||
| FTMU | 7.43 | -0.01 | -0.07% |
| Franklin Municipal Income ETF (FTMU) | |||
| BWG | 6.99 | -0.03 | -0.43% |
| BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund | |||
| FLYU | 35.28 | -0.73 | -2.04% |
| MicroSectors Travel 3x Leveraged ETN (FLYU) | |||