Advertisement
EPR vs PINE
Which Stock Would AI Choose? EPR Properties (EPR) vs. Alpine Income Property Trust (PINE) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- EPR Properties is a large-cap experiential REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust) with a ~$4.85 billion market capitalization, while Alpine Income Property Trust is a small-cap net lease REIT valued at approximately $389 million — a roughly 12x difference in scale.
- Both stocks offer compelling dividend yields near 5.8%, but EPR pays monthly ($0.31/share) while PINE pays quarterly ($0.30/share), and both recently raised their dividends by approximately 5%.
- EPR's 2025 FFOAA (Funds From Operations as Adjusted, a key REIT profitability metric) grew 5.1% year-over-year to $5.12 per share, while PINE's AFFO (Adjusted Funds From Operations) rose 8.6% to $1.89 per share — reflecting faster relative growth for the smaller company.
- EPR carries a P/E ratio of roughly 19.6, whereas PINE trades at a significantly higher trailing P/E of approximately 87–98, reflecting differences in scale, earnings quality, and market expectations.
- EPR's portfolio is concentrated in experiential properties (theaters, ski resorts, eat & play venues), while PINE focuses on diversified single-tenant net lease commercial properties with investment-grade tenants.
- From a momentum perspective, both stocks have posted strong year-to-date gains, with EPR up roughly 31% and PINE up approximately 24% in 2026, though their risk profiles and market positioning differ considerably.
Introduction
Comparing EPR and PINE offers a revealing look at two REITs operating at opposite ends of the size spectrum, yet both competing for income-oriented investor capital. EPR Properties brings a $7 billion experiential property portfolio spanning theaters, ski resorts, and entertainment venues across North America. Alpine Income Property Trust, by contrast, is a nimble net lease operator with a portfolio of single-tenant commercial properties leased predominantly to credit-rated tenants. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors weighing the trade-offs between a mature, diversified experiential REIT and a smaller, faster-growing net lease platform — each offering distinct risk-reward profiles in the current market environment.
EPR Overview and Recent Performance
EPR Properties is a specialty REIT headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri, with a portfolio of 333 properties across 42 states and Canada. The company concentrates on experiential real estate — theaters, eat & play venues, ski resorts, attractions, fitness & wellness facilities, and education properties. In recent quarters, EPR has executed a deliberate capital recycling strategy, selling legacy theater assets and redeploying proceeds into higher-growth experiential categories such as golf courses and waterparks.
Financially, EPR delivered full-year 2025 FFOAA of $5.12 per diluted share, a 5.1% increase over 2024, while AFFO (Adjusted Funds From Operations) reached $5.14 per share, up 6.2%. The company has introduced 2026 FFOAA guidance of $5.28 to $5.48, representing approximately 5.1% growth at the midpoint. EPR's balance sheet remains robust: following a $550 million senior notes issuance in November 2025, the company ended the year with $90.6 million in cash, zero drawn on its $1.0 billion revolving credit facility, and no debt maturities until August 2026. The stock has traded in a 52-week range of approximately $48.11 to $64.59, with a forward dividend yield near 5.86%. A recently announced 5.1% monthly dividend increase to $0.31 per share underscores management's confidence in the growth trajectory.
PINE Overview and Recent Performance
PINE, Alpine Income Property Trust, is a Florida-based net lease REIT that owns and operates a portfolio of single-tenant commercial income properties. The company targets high-quality, credit-rated tenants and supplements its property portfolio with a select book of commercial loan investments. PINE's tenant roster includes recognizable names such as Lowe's and Dick's Sporting Goods, with approximately 48% of annualized base rent (ABR) derived from investment-grade rated tenants.
The company completed a record $277.7 million in total investments during 2025 while executing $82.8 million in select dispositions — a significant volume relative to its market capitalization. PINE reported full-year 2025 AFFO of $1.89 per diluted share, an 8.6% year-over-year increase, with fourth-quarter AFFO per share surging 22.7% compared to the prior-year period. Net income per diluted share for 2025 was a loss of $0.22, weighed down by depreciation and impairment charges, but forward-looking FFO metrics point toward meaningful improvement. For 2026, PINE has guided to AFFO of $2.09 to $2.13 per share and FFO of $2.07 to $2.11. The company raised its quarterly dividend by 5.3% to $0.30 per share, reflecting a payout ratio near 60%. PINE's stock has ranged from roughly $13.10 to $21.99 over the past 52 weeks, with recent trading near the upper end of that range.
Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating opportunities like EPR and PINE, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of the platform's most compelling automated trading strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots — over 350 in total — spanning stocks, ETFs, forex, and cryptocurrencies, each built on proprietary Financial Learning Models (FLMs). These bots operate across multiple timeframes (from 5-minute to daily) and employ diverse trading styles including trend following, day trading, swing trading, and pattern recognition. What sets the Trending AI Robots section apart is its selectivity: only the best-performing and most market-appropriate bots earn a place in this curated lineup. Performance statistics vary widely, with top bots posting annualized returns ranging from 40% to well over 150% in backtesting and live simulations, alongside win rates that can exceed 60–65%. Each bot features transparent closed-trade histories, allowing traders to evaluate real track records before committing. Whether you are looking for high-frequency strategies or longer-term trend approaches, exploring the Trending AI Robots section can help identify automated tools aligned with the current market environment.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The contrast between EPR and PINE extends well beyond market capitalization. Here are the key dimensions where these two REITs diverge:
Business Model and Sector Exposure: EPR is an experiential REIT, meaning its portfolio performance is tied to consumer discretionary spending on out-of-home leisure and entertainment. This creates sensitivity to box office trends, travel patterns, and broader consumer confidence. PINE operates in the more traditional net lease space, where tenants sign long-term, triple-net leases — meaning tenants pay property taxes, insurance, and maintenance — producing relatively predictable cash flows less correlated with consumer whims.
Scale and Liquidity: EPR's $4.85 billion market cap and average daily trading volume of over 650,000 shares offer substantially greater liquidity than PINE's ~$389 million market cap and ~175,000 share average volume. For institutional investors, this difference matters considerably.
Growth Trajectory: PINE's AFFO per share grew 8.6% in 2025 and is guided for roughly 11–12% growth in 2026, reflecting the compounding effect of deploying capital from a smaller base. EPR's 5.1% FFOAA growth and similar 2026 guidance reflect the steadier, more incremental expansion pattern of a mature enterprise. PINE's record $278 million in 2025 investments represented nearly 75% of its current market cap — a pace of reinvestment EPR cannot match proportionally.
Risk Factors: EPR's theater exposure, while declining (now roughly 38% of pre-tax profits), remains a concentration risk in an industry still adjusting to post-pandemic viewing habits. PINE's risk profile centers on its smaller size, higher relative leverage (enterprise value roughly double its market cap), and the credit performance of a more concentrated tenant base. PINE's commercial loan portfolio — which includes higher-yielding but riskier loans at rates of 10–17% — adds a layer of complexity not present in EPR's purer real estate portfolio.
Valuation and Income: Both stocks offer similar dividend yields in the 5.8% range, but their underlying valuations differ sharply. EPR's P/E of ~19.6 reflects steady, proven earnings power, while PINE's elevated trailing P/E of ~87–98 reflects the distorting effect of non-cash charges on GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) net income. On a forward FFO basis, both appear more reasonably priced relative to their respective growth rates.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings momentum, balance sheet quality, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely express a near-term preference for EPR for stability-oriented investors — its established earnings base, stronger liquidity, lower leverage metrics, and smoother trend profile align well with AI models that prioritize risk-adjusted consistency. However, PINE would likely attract greater interest from AI strategies oriented toward growth momentum, given its faster AFFO expansion rate, aggressive capital deployment, and the potential for mean-reversion as GAAP earnings normalize. Neither stock represents a categorically superior choice; rather, the AI-driven preference depends on the specific strategy parameters — whether prioritizing trend stability (favoring EPR) or growth acceleration (favoring PINE). In the current market environment, both REITs exhibit positive signals, though their divergent risk profiles mean they would likely appeal to different AI trading bots within Tickeron's diverse ecosystem.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPR is a Buy and PINE is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePINE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EPR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PINE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PINE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EPR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PINE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EPR (@Specialty Telecommunications) experienced а -1.82% price change this week, while PINE (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -1.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -2.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.20%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -4.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.33%.
Reported Earning Dates
EPR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
PINE is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Telecommunications (-2.47% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-4.56% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| EPR | PINE | EPR / PINE | |
| Capitalization | 4.76B | 333M | 1,428% |
| EBITDA | 578M | 50.7M | 1,140% |
| Gain YTD | 29.164 | 24.463 | 119% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.89 | 96.10 | 21% |
| Revenue | 699M | 69.9M | 1,000% |
| Total Cash | 16.2M | 2.78M | 583% |
| Total Debt | 3.53B | 375M | 940% |
EPR | PINE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 71 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EPR's Valuation (18) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PINE (38) in the null industry. This means that EPR’s stock grew similarly to PINE’s over the last 12 months.
EPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PINE (38) in the null industry. This means that EPR’s stock grew similarly to PINE’s over the last 12 months.
EPR's SMR Rating (71) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PINE (90) in the null industry. This means that EPR’s stock grew similarly to PINE’s over the last 12 months.
EPR's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PINE (44) in the null industry. This means that EPR’s stock grew similarly to PINE’s over the last 12 months.
PINE's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as EPR (79) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PINE’s stock grew similarly to EPR’s over the last 12 months.
| EPR | PINE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 63% | 17 days ago 44% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 40% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SKYU | 40.46 | 1.60 | +4.12% |
| ProShares Ultra Cloud Computing | |||
| MVFD | 30.71 | 0.24 | +0.78% |
| Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF | |||
| SPTM | 90.73 | 0.56 | +0.62% |
| State StreetSPDRPortS&P1500CompStkMktETF | |||
| AVSF | 46.37 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF | |||
| DANA | 25.03 | -0.02 | -0.07% |
| Dana Limited Volatility ETF | |||
EPR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPR has been closely correlated with EPRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPR jumps, then EPRT could also see price increases.
PINE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINE has been loosely correlated with GLPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINE jumps, then GLPI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PINE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINE | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| GLPI - PINE | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| STAG - PINE | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| NXRT - PINE | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| DOC - PINE | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| EPR - PINE | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.56% | ||
More | ||||