Advertisement
GLPI vs PINE
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) vs. Alpine Income Property Trust (PINE) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- GLPI is a large-cap gaming REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust) with a market capitalization near $12.8 billion, while PINE is a small-cap net-lease REIT valued at roughly $364 million, making them fundamentally different in scale, liquidity, and growth dynamics.
- Over the past year, PINE has delivered a total return of approximately 54%, dramatically outpacing GLPI's roughly 3% gain, driven by aggressive portfolio repositioning and AFFO (Adjusted Funds From Operations) growth.
- GLPI offers a substantially higher dividend yield near 7%, supported by predictable triple-net lease cash flows from casino operators, while PINE provides a lower but growing dividend (recently raised 6.7%) with a conservative payout ratio.
- Both stocks carry low beta values (GLPI: 0.69, PINE: 0.57), indicating lower volatility relative to the broader market, though their sensitivity to interest rate movements differs given their capital structures.
- PINE has shown stronger recent earnings momentum, with Q2 2026 AFFO per share rising 32% year-over-year, while GLPI continues to post steady but more moderate operational growth.
- Analyst consensus for PINE sits at a unanimous "Buy" rating, reflecting optimism about the company's capital recycling strategy and improving tenant credit quality.
Introduction
Investors evaluating REITs often face a choice between yield stability and growth potential — a decision crystallized when comparing GLPI and PINE. Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) is a dominant force in gaming real estate, owning casino properties leased to some of the largest names in the industry. Alpine Income Property Trust (PINE), by contrast, operates in the single-tenant retail net-lease space, managing a diversified portfolio of commercial properties. This comparison is particularly relevant for income-oriented investors seeking to understand how two REITs with different business models, growth trajectories, and risk profiles stack up against each other in the current market environment. Both stocks have drawn attention in recent weeks for distinct reasons, making a side-by-side evaluation timely.
GLPI Overview and Recent Performance
GLPI is a self-administered, self-managed REIT that owns and leases gaming and related entertainment facilities across the United States. Its portfolio encompasses 68 properties in 20 states, leased under long-term, triple-net agreements to eight operating partners including PENN Entertainment, Bally's, Caesars, and Boyd Gaming. Under triple-net leases, tenants bear the costs of property taxes, insurance, and maintenance, which supports highly predictable rental cash flows for GLPI.
In recent weeks, GLPI's stock has traded in the $43 to $45 range, moving within a broader 52-week band of approximately $41 to $50. The shares have returned roughly 4% year-to-date and about 3% over the trailing twelve months, reflecting a steady but unspectacular performance profile. The company's most recent financial results have shown record AFFO per share levels, with the annualized dividend reaching $3.28 per share — translating to a compelling yield above 7%. However, GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) net income has faced pressure from non-cash credit loss provisions tied to more cautious economic forecasts. With a net debt to EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) ratio near 4.7x and a weighted average debt maturity of over six years, GLPI maintains a sturdy balance sheet. The company's next earnings release is scheduled for late July 2026 and may provide updated guidance on development commitments, which currently exceed $740 million in unfunded projects.
PINE Overview and Recent Performance
PINE is a small-cap REIT that owns and operates a portfolio of single-tenant net-lease commercial properties, primarily retail assets located in or near metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). Unlike GLPI's concentrated gaming focus, PINE's portfolio is diversified across tenants and industries, with Lowe's and Dick's Sporting Goods now representing its two largest tenants. Approximately 48% of the company's annualized base rent (ABR) is derived from investment-grade rated tenants — a notable credit quality improvement achieved through deliberate portfolio recycling.
PINE's stock has been one of the standout performers in the net-lease REIT segment over the past year, delivering a total return of roughly 54% and a year-to-date gain of approximately 27%. In recent weeks, the shares have traded near the upper end of their 52-week range, buoyed by a strong second-quarter 2026 earnings report that exceeded Wall Street expectations. The company posted AFFO per diluted share growth of 32% year-over-year, raised its quarterly dividend by 6.7% to $0.32 per share, and lifted the lower end of its full-year 2026 guidance. With a record $278 million in total investment activity completed during 2025 and an additional $170 million to $200 million targeted for 2026, PINE has demonstrated an ability to source and close attractively yielding transactions. The company's market capitalization of approximately $364 million positions it as a nimble but less liquid alternative to larger REIT peers.
Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like GLPI and PINE, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated window into AI-powered trading strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots — also referred to as AI Robots or AI Agents — that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, forex, and crypto markets. Only a select subset earns placement in the Trending section, where bots are ranked based on real-time performance and suitability for prevailing market conditions. These bots operate across various timeframes (including 5-minute, 15-minute, and 60-minute intervals) and employ distinct trading styles ranging from swing trading to pattern-based breakout strategies. Among the top-performing bots, annualized returns have ranged from approximately 75% to over 500% during certain measurement periods, with some strategies achieving Sharpe ratios above 2.0 and win rates exceeding 80%. Each bot provides transparent statistics — including profit factor, maximum drawdown, and trade-by-trade logs — allowing users to assess risk alongside return potential. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to discover which AI-powered strategies are navigating today's market with the most consistency.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The differences between GLPI and PINE extend well beyond market capitalization. GLPI operates in a concentrated, high-barrier-to-entry niche — gaming real estate — where its triple-net lease structure and 100% occupancy rate provide exceptional cash flow visibility. The trade-off is growth that is inherently tied to casino operators' capital cycles and regulatory developments, which can limit upside relative to more diversified REITs. PINE, on the other hand, has embraced an active capital recycling model — selling lower-quality assets and redeploying proceeds into higher-yielding, better-credit properties and commercial loan investments. This strategy has produced industry-leading AFFO per share growth, with projected 2026 growth of roughly 13% at the guidance midpoint.
On the income front, GLPI's dividend yield of over 7% substantially exceeds PINE's yield of approximately 6.1%, making GLPI the more immediate choice for yield-focused investors. However, PINE's lower payout ratio (approximately 55% of AFFO) leaves greater room for dividend increases and reinvestment, while GLPI's higher payout ratio reflects its more mature, lower-growth profile. From a risk perspective, GLPI's tenant concentration among gaming operators exposes it to sector-specific headwinds such as changes in gaming legislation or consumer spending shifts. PINE's broader tenant diversification mitigates single-industry risk, but its smaller size and reliance on external capital markets for growth introduce liquidity and financing risks that GLPI, with its $12.8 billion market cap and investment-grade balance sheet, does not face to the same degree.
Valuation further highlights the contrast: GLPI trades at a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio around 14 and an EV/EBITDA (Enterprise Value to EBITDA) multiple near 13, while PINE's GAAP-based trailing P/E is significantly elevated due to depreciation and impairment charges that obscure its core cash-flow generation. On an AFFO multiple basis, both stocks appear more reasonably valued, though PINE's premium reflects its superior recent growth trajectory. Market sentiment, as measured by price momentum and analyst ratings, currently tilts toward PINE, which carries a unanimous "Buy" consensus with a price target implying additional upside.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor PINE in the current market environment — with important caveats. PINE's stronger directional trend, evidenced by a 54% one-year return and accelerating AFFO per share growth in the 30%-plus range, aligns with momentum-based signals that AI models often prioritize. The company's recent earnings beat, dividend increase, and upward guidance revision collectively form a positive catalyst pattern that trend-following algorithms tend to identify as actionable. Meanwhile, GLPI presents a more range-bound technical profile, with its stock hovering between established support and resistance levels without a clear breakout catalyst on the immediate horizon.
That said, GLPI's superior yield, defensive characteristics, and institutional scale make it a potentially more stable holding during periods of elevated market uncertainty. The AI verdict is probabilistic, not absolute — meaning that under different market regimes — such as a flight to yield or a rotation toward large-cap value — GLPI could quickly become the algorithmically preferred name. For now, the convergence of momentum, growth, and improving fundamentals gives PINE a marginal edge in the AI-driven comparison, while acknowledging that both REITs serve distinct and legitimate roles within a diversified income portfolio.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPI is a StrongBuy and PINE is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLPI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePINE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GLPI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PINE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GLPI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PINE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GLPI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PINE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GLPI (@Specialty Telecommunications) experienced а -0.84% price change this week, while PINE (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -1.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -2.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.20%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -4.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.33%.
Reported Earning Dates
GLPI is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
PINE is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Telecommunications (-2.47% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-4.56% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| GLPI | PINE | GLPI / PINE | |
| Capitalization | 12.7B | 333M | 3,814% |
| EBITDA | 1.66B | 50.7M | 3,282% |
| Gain YTD | 3.642 | 24.463 | 15% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.10 | 96.10 | 14% |
| Revenue | 1.66B | 69.9M | 2,368% |
| Total Cash | 319M | 2.78M | 11,483% |
| Total Debt | 8.38B | 375M | 2,235% |
GLPI | PINE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GLPI's Valuation (11) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PINE (38) in the null industry. This means that GLPI’s stock grew similarly to PINE’s over the last 12 months.
GLPI's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PINE (38) in the null industry. This means that GLPI’s stock grew similarly to PINE’s over the last 12 months.
GLPI's SMR Rating (45) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PINE (90) in the null industry. This means that GLPI’s stock grew somewhat faster than PINE’s over the last 12 months.
PINE's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as GLPI (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PINE’s stock grew similarly to GLPI’s over the last 12 months.
PINE's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as GLPI (78) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PINE’s stock grew similarly to GLPI’s over the last 12 months.
| GLPI | PINE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 38% | 3 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 43% | 17 days ago 44% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 40% |
Advertisement
PINE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINE has been loosely correlated with GLPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINE jumps, then GLPI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PINE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINE | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| GLPI - PINE | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| STAG - PINE | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| NXRT - PINE | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| DOC - PINE | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| EPR - PINE | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.56% | ||
More | ||||