Advertisement
GLPI vs PINE
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) vs. Alpine Income Property Trust (PINE) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Different niches within the same asset class: Both are triple-net-lease REITs (real estate investment trusts), but GLPI focuses on gaming real estate, while PINE owns single-tenant retail properties.
- Scale gap is significant: GLPI carries a market capitalization of roughly $11 billion, versus roughly $350 million for PINE, shaping very different liquidity and risk profiles.
- Income appeal is comparable: GLPI offers a dividend yield around 8%, while PINE's yield is near 7%, with both distributions recently raised.
- Growth engines diverge: GLPI is deploying a nearly $1.8 billion development pipeline, while PINE is growing through acquisitions and a high-yield commercial loan book.
- Analyst sentiment is constructive on both: Each stock carries a consensus "Buy" rating, though PINE trades with a smaller price-to-earnings multiple and lower beta (sensitivity to market moves).
Introduction
This stock comparison examines two income-oriented real estate investment trusts that appeal to dividend-focused investors yet operate in markedly different corners of the commercial property market. GLPI (Gaming and Leisure Properties) owns casino and gaming-related real estate leased under long-term, triple-net agreements, while PINE (Alpine Income Property Trust) holds a diversified portfolio of single-tenant retail properties plus a growing commercial loan segment. Comparing their relative performance and market positioning helps both yield-seeking investors and tactical traders assess where current trends, catalysts, and risk factors may point.
GLPI Overview and Recent Performance
GLPI is a self-administered, self-managed REIT that acquires, finances, and owns real estate leased to casino operators, including properties tied to Bally's, The Cordish Companies, and tribal gaming developments. Its revenue is generated almost entirely through rental income under triple-net leases, where tenants cover most property-level operating costs.
In recent weeks, GLPI has reported record first-quarter results and raised its full-year guidance, supported by robust deal flow. The company funded development across projects such as Bally's Chicago and Live! Casino & Hotel Virginia, and it closed the $700 million acquisition of the Bally's Lincoln real estate. Financial leverage stood at 5.0x net debt to adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), at the low end of its 5.0x–5.5x target range. Despite this operational momentum, the shares have traded near the lower end of their 52-week range, with several analysts trimming price targets while retaining constructive ratings, reflecting broader sensitivity to interest-rate expectations and tenant credit concerns.
PINE Overview and Recent Performance
PINE (Alpine Income Property Trust) is a much smaller REIT that owns and operates single-tenant, net-leased commercial properties across 31 U.S. states, spanning roughly 128 properties and 4.5 million square feet with 99.5% occupancy. Its portfolio has been shifting toward investment-grade tenants, which now contribute about 55% of annualized base rent.
Recent market activity has been defined by accelerating investment. PINE completed roughly $77 million of gross investment in its most recent reported quarter at an 8.7% blended initial yield and returned to profitability after prior-year losses, with revenue up more than 30% year over year. Management raised the low end of its 2026 guidance and increased the quarterly dividend by 6.7%. The company also maintains a commercial loan portfolio, with a weighted average coupon above 13%, targeted near 20% of undepreciated asset value. These developments have supported positive sentiment, though the stock's smaller size, elevated leverage of 6.6x net debt to adjusted EBITDA, and tenant-concentration history remain watchpoints.
Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page highlights a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively monitor thousands of tickers, yet only the strongest performers suited to current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, holding timeframe, historical performance, and the specific set of tickers they trade, allowing users to filter by metrics such as win rate, trade frequency, and profitability. Because the roster is refreshed to reflect the evolving market environment, it serves as a practical starting point for identifying systematic approaches. Explore the Trending AI Robots section to see which strategies are currently standing out.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The most striking contrast between these two REITs is sector exposure and concentration. GLPI is tied to the gaming industry, which carries regulatory barriers to entry but concentrates risk in a handful of casino operators and depends on consumer discretionary spending. PINE is diversified across everyday retail tenants, reducing single-sector dependence but leaving it exposed to shifts in brick-and-mortar retail and tenant credit quality.
On growth, GLPI's scale enables large, accretive transactions and a deep development pipeline, while PINE's smaller base allows for faster percentage growth from acquisitions and its higher-yielding loan book. Risk profiles differ too: GLPI benefits from investment-grade scale and lower leverage, whereas PINE operates with higher leverage relative to earnings but a lower market beta. In terms of recent momentum, both stocks have faced interest-rate-driven volatility, but PINE has shown stronger relative performance over the trailing year, aided by its return to profitability and dividend growth.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely tilt toward GLPI for its trend consistency and stability. GLPI combines a larger, more liquid profile, lower relative leverage, a well-covered dividend, and a substantial, visible growth pipeline, which tends to favor systematic strategies that weight trend durability and lower volatility. PINE offers compelling upside potential and stronger recent momentum from its small base, which may appeal to more aggressive, higher-beta approaches. The verdict is probabilistic rather than definitive: GLPI's steadier positioning currently aligns more closely with trend-following AI signals, while PINE's faster growth and improving credit profile could narrow the gap if its momentum persists.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPI is a Hold and PINE is a Hold.
GLPI in downward trend: price dove below 50-day moving average on November 10, 2026
GLPI moved below its 50-day moving average on November 10, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 35 of 56 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 34 of 66 cases where GLPI's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 52%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GLPI declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 47%.
GLPI broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where GLPI's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 7 of 22 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 32%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 09, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on GLPI as a result. In 49 of 103 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 48%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for GLPI just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where GLPI's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 24 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 53%.
Following a +2.85% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GLPI advanced for three days, in 126 of 303 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 42%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 105 of 252 cases where GLPI Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 42%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 46 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. GLPI’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 65 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.270) is normal, around the industry mean (1.837). P/E Ratio (11.371) is within average values for comparable stocks, (27.919). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.660) is also within normal values, averaging (2.612). GLPI has a moderately high Dividend Yield (0.084) as compared to the industry average of (0.043). P/S Ratio (6.925) is also within normal values, averaging (5.594).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 70 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. GLPI’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 78, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 80 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
PINE's Indicator enters downward trend
The Aroon Indicator for PINE entered a downward trend on October 06, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 194 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 106 of the 194 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 55%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 50-day moving average for PINE moved below the 200-day moving average on October 13, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PINE declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 49%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where PINE's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 11 of 20 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 55%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 32 of 67 cases where PINE's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 48%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 06, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on PINE as a result. In 51 of 97 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 53%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PINE just turned positive on November 04, 2026. Looking at past instances where PINE's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 29 of 58 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 50%.
Following a +1.64% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PINE advanced for three days, in 138 of 306 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 45%.
PINE may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 44 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.884) is normal, around the industry mean (2.797). P/E Ratio (72.261) is within average values for comparable stocks, (36.193). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (12.808). Dividend Yield (0.077) settles around the average of (339.763) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.250) is also within normal values, averaging (6.739).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. PINE’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 63 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 60, placing this stock slightly worse than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 73 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
GLPI | PINE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 63 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PINE's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as GLPI (65) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PINE’s stock grew similarly to GLPI’s over the last 12 months.
PINE's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as GLPI (70) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PINE’s stock grew similarly to GLPI’s over the last 12 months.
GLPI's SMR Rating (46) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PINE (89) in the null industry. This means that GLPI’s stock grew somewhat faster than PINE’s over the last 12 months.
GLPI's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PINE (59) in the null industry. This means that GLPI’s stock grew similarly to PINE’s over the last 12 months.
PINE's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as GLPI (80) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PINE’s stock grew similarly to GLPI’s over the last 12 months.
| GLPI | PINE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 42% | 27 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 47% | 6 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 7 days ago 55% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLPI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PINE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GLPI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PINE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GLPI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PINE’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GLPI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PINE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
GLPI (@Specialty Telecommunications) experienced а +0.18% price change this week, while PINE (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -0.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.56%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.75%.
Reported Earning Dates
GLPI is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2027.
PINE is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Telecommunications (-1.70% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.94% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
Advertisement
GLPI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLPI has been closely correlated with FCPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLPI jumps, then FCPT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLPI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLPI | 100% | -0.51% | ||
| FCPT - GLPI | 68% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| O - GLPI | 68% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| DOC - GLPI | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| CUBE - GLPI | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| EPRT - GLPI | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
More | ||||
PINE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINE has been loosely correlated with GLPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINE jumps, then GLPI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PINE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINE | 100% | -1.01% | ||
| GLPI - PINE | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| STAG - PINE | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| NXRT - PINE | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| DOC - PINE | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| NNN - PINE | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLBL | 22.68 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
| Franklin Senior Loan ETF Franklin Liberty Senior Loan Fund (FLBL) | |||
| EDGE | 51.08 | N/A | N/A |
| MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) | |||
| MTUM | 66.73 | -0.14 | -0.21% |
| iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) | |||
| BSTP | 39.70 | -0.15 | -0.39% |
| Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP) | |||
| DMB | 10.27 | -0.27 | -2.56% |
| BNY Mellon Municipal | |||