Net lease real estate has become one of the most closely watched segments of the REIT market, and Essential Properties Realty Trust (EPRT) and NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) sit at the heart of that conversation. Both companies acquire single-tenant, net leased properties where tenants cover most operating expenses, giving investors relatively predictable cash flow and dividend income. Yet they differ in size, tenant mix, growth trajectory, and market positioning. This stock comparison is relevant for income-oriented investors, REIT specialists, and traders evaluating relative performance between two names that share a business model but diverge on the details that often drive long-term returns.
Essential Properties Realty Trust (EPRT) is a Princeton, New Jersey-based REIT that owns and manages single-tenant, net leased properties leased on a long-term basis to operators across service-oriented and experience-based industries, including restaurants, car washes, early childhood education, and automotive services. With a market capitalization near $5.6 billion, it is one of the larger pure-play names in its niche.
In recent weeks, EPRT has traded in a range well below its 52-week high, with shares consolidating in the mid-$20s after a broader pullback from earlier 2026 levels. A notable development was the company's mid-September amendment of its primary credit agreement, which raised its revolving credit facility from $1.0 billion to $1.3 billion and adjusted lending terms. This move provides additional liquidity to fund disciplined acquisitions and has been viewed by some analysts as a sign of confidence in the company's external growth pipeline. The stock also received an analyst upgrade to a "Strong Buy" rating in March 2026. Sentiment has been supported by the company's contractual rent escalations and a high share of repeat business from existing tenants.
NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) is a Dallas, Texas-based, internally managed REIT that specializes in acquiring single-tenant, net lease retail properties across the United States, with a stated focus on e-commerce-resistant tenants and investment-grade credit profiles. It is a younger and smaller platform, with a market capitalization around $1.7 billion and a portfolio weighted toward necessity-based and discount retail.
Over recent weeks, NTST has traded near the lower end of its 52-week range, with shares pulling back toward the mid-to-upper teens after trading above $20 earlier in the year. The stock's higher dividend yield, near 5% or above depending on the trading day, reflects both its income appeal and the market's more cautious view of its smaller scale and higher relative leverage. Growth has been a defining feature of the story: revenue has climbed steadily in recent fiscal years, and analysts project continued double-digit expansion. However, tenant concentration in sectors such as dollar stores and drugstores has drawn scrutiny, and the stock's recent momentum has lagged as investors weigh credit and portfolio-diversification considerations.
Tickeron operates hundreds of AI Trading Bots that monitor and trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, forex, and cryptocurrencies. Because each bot has its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance record, and set of tickers it follows, only the best-performing and most suitable bots for current market conditions are featured in the curated Trending AI Robots section. This continuously updated list highlights algorithmic strategies that have demonstrated consistency and adaptability across shifting market regimes, giving users a way to filter through a large universe of signals and statistics. Whether you are evaluating a specific net lease REIT pair like EPRT and NTST or scanning the broader market, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help you identify automated strategies aligned with current conditions.
Although EPRT and NTST share the net lease model, their contrasts are meaningful. EPRT is roughly three times larger by market capitalization, offers a more diversified, service-oriented tenant base, and carries a lower debt-to-equity ratio. Its valuation is more moderate on a price-to-FFO basis, and its interest coverage is stronger, reflecting a more mature, lower-risk profile.
NTST, by contrast, is a higher-growth but higher-risk proposition. It has expanded revenue rapidly and commands a larger consensus price-target upside, yet it also trades at a higher forward P/E (price-to-earnings) multiple, holds higher relative leverage, and faces more concentrated tenant and sector exposure. From a momentum standpoint, both names have weakened in recent market activity, but NTST has fallen more sharply toward its 52-week low, while EPRT has shown relatively steadier trading. In terms of risk, EPRT leans toward stability and liquidity, while NTST offers higher potential reward tied to execution and external growth.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, balance-sheet stability, liquidity, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor EPRT in the current environment. The larger company's steadier price behavior, lower relative leverage, stronger interest coverage, and recently expanded credit capacity suggest a more consistent and defensible setup, even as both stocks face similar macro headwinds. NTST offers a more compelling growth narrative and larger potential upside, but its smaller scale and sharper recent drawdown introduce greater variability. A probabilistic read would lean toward EPRT for stability and trend consistency, while acknowledging that NTST may appeal to investors with a higher risk tolerance and a longer time horizon.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The RSI Indicator for EPRT moved out of oversold territory on October 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 26 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 17 of the 26 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 65%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on EPRT as a result. In 47 of 86 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 55%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for EPRT just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where EPRT's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 27 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 56%.
Following a +1.71% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where EPRT advanced for three days, in 181 of 337 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.
EPRT may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 36 of 64 cases where EPRT's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 56%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where EPRT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 50%.
The Aroon Indicator for EPRT entered a downward trend on October 19, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 69 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.221) is normal, around the industry mean (2.646). P/E Ratio (19.146) is within average values for comparable stocks, (34.201). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.250) is also within normal values, averaging (12.808). Dividend Yield (0.051) settles around the average of (305.774) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (9.050) is also within normal values, averaging (6.739).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 74 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. EPRT’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 74 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. EPRT’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 62, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 75 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 80 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The RSI Oscillator for NTST moved out of oversold territory on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 28 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 19 of the 28 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 68%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 30 of 53 cases where NTST's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for NTST just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where NTST's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 20 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 43%.
Following a +0.80% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NTST advanced for three days, in 168 of 285 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.
NTST may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The 50-day moving average for NTST moved below the 200-day moving average on October 09, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NTST declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 53%.
The Aroon Indicator for NTST entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 41 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 71 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.063) is normal, around the industry mean (2.646). NTST's P/E Ratio (117.643) is considerably higher than the industry average of (34.201). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (12.808). Dividend Yield (0.055) settles around the average of (305.774) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (8.285) is also within normal values, averaging (6.739).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 75 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. NTST’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. NTST’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 62, placing this stock worse than average.
EPRT | NTST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 41 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EPRT's Valuation (69) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NTST (71) in the null industry. This means that EPRT’s stock grew similarly to NTST’s over the last 12 months.
EPRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NTST (100) in the null industry. This means that EPRT’s stock grew similarly to NTST’s over the last 12 months.
EPRT's SMR Rating (80) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NTST (89) in the null industry. This means that EPRT’s stock grew similarly to NTST’s over the last 12 months.
EPRT's Price Growth Rating (74) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NTST (75) in the null industry. This means that EPRT’s stock grew similarly to NTST’s over the last 12 months.
EPRT's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NTST (89) in the null industry. This means that EPRT’s stock grew similarly to NTST’s over the last 12 months.
| EPRT | NTST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 54% | 11 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 47% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while NTST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPRT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTST’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
EPRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -2.96% price change this week, while NTST (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -4.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.61%.
EPRT is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2027.
NTST is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2027.
A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPRT has been closely correlated with ADC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPRT jumps, then ADC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPRT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPRT | 100% | +5.50% | ||
| ADC - EPRT | 76% Closely correlated | +4.00% | ||
| FCPT - EPRT | 75% Closely correlated | +4.06% | ||
| NNN - EPRT | 74% Closely correlated | +3.46% | ||
| EPR - EPRT | 72% Closely correlated | +3.34% | ||
| O - EPRT | 70% Closely correlated | +3.09% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTST has been closely correlated with ADC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTST jumps, then ADC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTST | 100% | +3.34% | ||
| ADC - NTST | 70% Closely correlated | +4.00% | ||
| EPRT - NTST | 69% Closely correlated | +5.50% | ||
| NNN - NTST | 69% Closely correlated | +3.46% | ||
| O - NTST | 68% Closely correlated | +3.09% | ||
| GTY - NTST | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.57% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JMTG | 49.10 | 0.39 | +0.80% |
| JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) | |||
| AQEC | 26.34 | -0.03 | -0.13% |
| AQE Core ETF (AQEC) | |||
| GSEU | 47.70 | -0.47 | -0.97% |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) | |||
| NTSD | 46.65 | -0.80 | -1.69% |
| WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD) | |||
| BCCC | 13.10 | -0.28 | -2.12% |
| Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) | |||