When evaluating net-lease REITs (Real Estate Investment Trusts) for income and growth potential, investors often find themselves weighing established giants against up-and-coming contenders. NNN REIT, Inc. — formerly known as National Retail Properties — and NTST, NETSTREIT Corp., both operate in the single-tenant retail net-lease sector, yet they represent very different stages of corporate maturity. NNN brings a 36-year track record of consecutive annual dividend increases and a multi-billion-dollar portfolio, while NETSTREIT embodies a younger, leaner approach with aggressive acquisition-driven growth. This comparison is particularly relevant for income-oriented investors evaluating dividend reliability, growth-oriented traders assessing expansion trajectories, and anyone seeking to understand how two companies with similar business models can present sharply different risk-and-reward profiles in the current market.
NNN (NNN REIT, Inc.), headquartered in Orlando, Florida, is one of the most recognized names in the net-lease REIT industry. The company owns a diversified portfolio of approximately 3,692 single-tenant retail properties spread across all 50 U.S. states, leased to more than 400 tenants operating in over 35 distinct lines of trade — including convenience stores, automotive service centers, restaurants, and entertainment venues. With a market capitalization exceeding $8.4 billion as of recent data, NNN is firmly established in the large-cap REIT universe.
Over recent quarters, NNN has demonstrated steady financial performance. The company reported full-year 2025 AFFO of $3.44 per diluted share, representing a 2.7% increase over the prior year. Annual base rent (ABR) grew 7.8% to approximately $928 million, supported by a record $931 million in property acquisitions at an attractive weighted-average initial cash capitalization rate of 7.4%. Occupancy recovered to 98.3% by year-end 2025 after a temporary dip earlier in the year. NNN's balance sheet remains a cornerstone of its appeal: gross debt of roughly $4.9 billion carries a weighted average interest rate of just 4.2% and a sector-leading weighted average maturity of 10.8 years, with no floating-rate debt exposure. The company's quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share translates to an annualized yield of about 6.1% based on recent pricing, backed by a conservative 70% AFFO payout ratio. Initial 2026 AFFO guidance of $3.52 to $3.58 per share signals continued mid-single-digit growth.
NTST (NETSTREIT Corp.), based in Dallas, Texas, is an internally managed REIT that has rapidly carved out a position in the single-tenant net-lease retail space. With a market capitalization of roughly $1.96 billion, the company is notably smaller than NNN but has been growing at a brisk pace. Its portfolio comprises 758 properties across 45 states, serving 129 tenants in 28 industries, with a pronounced emphasis on tenants that are resilient to e-commerce disruption — including home improvement, auto parts, drug stores, grocers, and quick-service restaurants.
NETSTREIT's recent financial trajectory reflects its growth-oriented posture. For full-year 2025, the company reported AFFO of $1.31 per diluted share, a 4.0% increase over 2024. Gross investment activity for the year totaled approximately $657 million at a blended cash yield of 7.5%, including a company-record $245 million in the fourth quarter alone. A pivotal development in late 2025 was the achievement of an investment-grade credit rating of BBB- from Fitch Ratings, which meaningfully enhances NETSTREIT's borrowing capacity and capital-market credibility. The portfolio maintains a near-perfect occupancy rate of 99.9%, and investment-grade or investment-grade-profile tenants account for roughly 58% of ABR. The company increased its quarterly dividend by 2.3% to $0.22 per share (approximately $0.88 annualized), and reaffirmed 2026 AFFO guidance of $1.35 to $1.39 per share. Adjusted net debt to annualized adjusted EBITDAre (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization for Real Estate) stood at 4.0x, reflecting a manageable leverage profile.
In an environment where data-driven decision-making is increasingly essential, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers investors a curated view into the most actively traded and highest-potential algorithmic strategies currently available. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots, each specializing in different tickers, trading styles, and timeframes — ranging from short-term swing trading models to longer-duration trend-following systems. Only the bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section, making it a valuable discovery layer for traders and investors seeking automated approaches. Performance statistics across the bot ecosystem can vary widely, with some bots showcasing double-digit annualized returns and others optimized for capital preservation and consistency. Each bot operates on a distinct combination of technical indicators, risk management rules, and asset selection criteria. To explore which AI-powered strategies are currently trending and suited to your trading objectives, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
The contrast between NNN and NTST is best understood as a comparison of scale, maturity, and growth trajectory. NNN's portfolio of nearly 3,700 properties dwarfs NTST's 758 investments, and this scale translates into meaningful operational advantages — broader tenant diversification, greater geographic dispersion, and deeper access to financing across credit cycles. NNN's 36-year dividend growth streak, the third-longest among all public REITs, underscores its capital discipline and operational consistency.
NTST, by contrast, is in a higher-growth phase. Its 4.0% AFFO growth in 2025 outpaced NNN's 2.7%, and the company's smaller base allows each acquisition to have a proportionally larger impact on per-share metrics. However, this growth comes with trade-offs: NTST's dividend yield of approximately 4.2% trails NNN's roughly 6.1%, meaning income-focused investors sacrifice current yield for capital appreciation potential. NTST's near-perfect 99.9% occupancy is impressive but also reflects a portfolio with less historical seasoning — a single tenant default could move the needle more meaningfully. On the credit front, NNN's long-established investment-grade profile and 10.8-year average debt maturity provide greater certainty in the current interest-rate environment, though NTST's newly attained BBB- rating from Fitch narrows the gap considerably. From a valuation standpoint, NNN trades at roughly 12.8x AFFO (based on recent pricing near $44 and 2026 guidance midpoint of $3.55), while NTST trades at roughly 15.2x AFFO (based on pricing near $20.84 and 2026 guidance midpoint of $1.37), suggesting the market is pricing in a premium for NTST's growth profile.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, stability metrics, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor NNN in the current market environment — particularly for risk-conscious investors. NNN's combination of a sector-leading 10.8-year debt maturity, a 36-year track record of uninterrupted dividend growth, a higher current yield, and a well-diversified portfolio spanning over 400 tenants provides a stability profile that quantitative models tend to reward during periods of macroeconomic uncertainty. The company's consistent mid-single-digit AFFO growth and conservative payout ratio suggest a durable compounding trajectory. That said, for strategies oriented toward growth and momentum, NETSTREIT's faster AFFO expansion rate, newly earned investment-grade status, and aggressive acquisition pace could generate a stronger AI signal in a risk-on environment. The probabilistic assessment is that NNN holds the edge for trend consistency and downside resilience, while NTST offers a more compelling growth narrative that may outperform in a sustained expansionary cycle.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NNN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NNN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTST’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
NNN (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -1.62% price change this week, while NTST (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -2.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.55%.
NNN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
NTST is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| NNN | NTST | NNN / NTST | |
| Capitalization | 8.88B | 2.09B | 424% |
| EBITDA | 871M | 161M | 541% |
| Gain YTD | 21.599 | 19.416 | 111% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.78 | 147.21 | 15% |
| Revenue | 936M | 206M | 454% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 20M | - |
| Total Debt | 4.85B | 1.42B | 342% |
NNN | NTST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NNN's Valuation (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTST (89) in the null industry. This means that NNN’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTST’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTST (96) in the null industry. This means that NNN’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTST’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's SMR Rating (75) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as NTST (91) in the null industry. This means that NNN’s stock grew similarly to NTST’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as NTST (55) in the null industry. This means that NNN’s stock grew similarly to NTST’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTST (88) in the null industry. This means that NNN’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTST’s over the last 12 months.
| NNN | NTST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 37% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NNN has been closely correlated with O. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NNN jumps, then O could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NNN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNN | 100% | +0.94% | ||
| O - NNN | 79% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| ADC - NNN | 74% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| EPRT - NNN | 71% Closely correlated | +1.34% | ||
| FCPT - NNN | 69% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| KIM - NNN | 66% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTST has been loosely correlated with O. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTST jumps, then O could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTST | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| O - NTST | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| ADC - NTST | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| EPRT - NTST | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.34% | ||
| DBRG - NTST | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| NNN - NTST | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
More | ||||