ET
Price
$19.33
Change
+$0.28 (+1.47%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
66.52B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GLP
Price
$47.47
Change
+$0.06 (+0.13%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.61B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ET vs GLP

ET vs GLP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ET vs. GLP commentary
Jul 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ET is a StrongBuy and GLP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2026
Stock price -- (ET: $19.33 vs. GLP: $47.47)
Brand notoriety: ET: Notable vs. GLP: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ET: 72% vs. GLP: 161%
Market capitalization -- ET: $66.52B vs. GLP: $1.61B
ET [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $66.52B. GLP’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $1.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $118.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $16.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGLP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GLP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ET is a better buy in the long-term than GLP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ET’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GLP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLP is a better buy in the short-term than ET.

Price Growth

ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.78% price change this week, while GLP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +2.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

ET is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

GLP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-1.01% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ET($66.5B) has a higher market cap than GLP($1.61B). ET has higher P/E ratio than GLP: ET (15.74) vs GLP (11.97). ET YTD gains are higher at: 21.480 vs. GLP (17.134). ET has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.9B vs. GLP (429M). ET has more cash in the bank: 951M vs. GLP (18.4M). GLP has less debt than ET: GLP (2.25B) vs ET (71.1B). ET has higher revenues than GLP: ET (92.3B) vs GLP (19.3B).
ETGLPET / GLP
Capitalization66.5B1.61B4,123%
EBITDA15.9B429M3,706%
Gain YTD21.48017.134125%
P/E Ratio15.7411.97132%
Revenue92.3B19.3B478%
Total Cash951M18.4M5,168%
Total Debt71.1B2.25B3,167%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ET vs GLP: Fundamental Ratings
ET
GLP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8015
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1627
SMR RATING
1..100
6650
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3581
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLP's Valuation (1) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as ET (3) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GLP’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

ET's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GLP (27) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to GLP’s over the last 12 months.

GLP's SMR Rating (50) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as ET (66) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GLP’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

ET's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GLP (51) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to GLP’s over the last 12 months.

ET's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLP (81) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that ET’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETGLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GLP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNI121.561.74
+1.45%
Canadian National Railway
MMI31.860.16
+0.50%
Marcus & Millichap
OZK52.11N/A
N/A
Bank OZK
VFF1.89N/A
N/A
Village Farms International
LICN1.02N/A
N/A
Lichen International Limited

ET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ET has been loosely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ET jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ET
1D Price
Change %
ET100%
+1.47%
OKE - ET
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.45%
WES - ET
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
KMI - ET
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
EPD - ET
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
PAGP - ET
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

GLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLP has been loosely correlated with CQP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLP jumps, then CQP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLP
1D Price
Change %
GLP100%
+0.13%
CQP - GLP
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
GEL - GLP
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
PBA - GLP
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
DKL - GLP
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
ET - GLP
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
More