ET
Price
$18.76
Change
-$0.28 (-1.47%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
64.56B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GLP
Price
$49.64
Change
+$0.71 (+1.45%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.69B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ET vs GLP

Header iconET vs GLP Comparison
Open Charts ET vs GLPBanner chart's image
ET vs GLP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ET vs. GLP commentary
Jun 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ET is a StrongBuy and GLP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 12, 2026
Stock price -- (ET: $18.76 vs. GLP: $49.64)
Brand notoriety: ET: Notable vs. GLP: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ET: 68% vs. GLP: 144%
Market capitalization -- ET: $64.56B vs. GLP: $1.69B
ET [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $64.56B. GLP’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $1.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $123.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $16.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGLP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GLP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ET is a better buy in the long-term than GLP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ET’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GLP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ET is a better buy in the short-term than GLP.

Price Growth

ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -4.38% price change this week, while GLP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

ET is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

GLP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.10% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ET($64.6B) has a higher market cap than GLP($1.69B). ET has higher P/E ratio than GLP: ET (15.63) vs GLP (13.79). GLP YTD gains are higher at: 22.488 vs. ET (17.898). ET has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.9B vs. GLP (429M). ET has more cash in the bank: 951M vs. GLP (18.4M). GLP has less debt than ET: GLP (2.25B) vs ET (71.1B). ET has higher revenues than GLP: ET (92.3B) vs GLP (19.3B).
ETGLPET / GLP
Capitalization64.6B1.69B3,832%
EBITDA15.9B429M3,706%
Gain YTD17.89822.48880%
P/E Ratio15.6313.79113%
Revenue92.3B19.3B478%
Total Cash951M18.4M5,168%
Total Debt71.1B2.25B3,167%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ET vs GLP: Fundamental Ratings
ET
GLP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7989
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1523
SMR RATING
1..100
6650
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3971
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7545

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ET's Valuation (2) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GLP (10) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to GLP’s over the last 12 months.

ET's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GLP (23) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to GLP’s over the last 12 months.

GLP's SMR Rating (50) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as ET (66) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GLP’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

ET's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GLP (50) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to GLP’s over the last 12 months.

ET's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GLP (71) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to GLP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETGLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GLP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTRN246.0021.95
+9.80%
Materion Corp
WVE5.800.14
+2.56%
Wave Life Sciences Ltd
LAW3.58-0.07
-1.92%
CS Disco
PSX178.10-3.62
-1.99%
Phillips 66
TXMD1.82-0.04
-2.15%
TherapeuticsMD

ET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ET has been loosely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ET jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ET
1D Price
Change %
ET100%
-1.47%
OKE - ET
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
WES - ET
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
EPD - ET
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
PAGP - ET
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
KMI - ET
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
More

GLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLP has been closely correlated with CQP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLP jumps, then CQP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLP
1D Price
Change %
GLP100%
+1.45%
CQP - GLP
67%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
GEL - GLP
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
DKL - GLP
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
ET - GLP
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
PBA - GLP
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
More