Advertisement
EPD vs ET
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) vs. Energy Transfer (ET) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both EPD and ET posted robust year-to-date gains exceeding 22%, with ET slightly ahead at 23.19%.
- ET provides a higher dividend yield of 6.70% compared to EPD's 5.76%.
- EPD trades at a lower trailing P/E ratio of 14.09 versus ET's 16.48, indicating potentially better valuation.
- Recent momentum indicators and MACD crossovers signal bullish trends for both stocks in recent market activity.
- Analyst price targets suggest modest upside, with EPD at $40.65 and ET at $22.36.
- Tickeron rates both as seriously undervalued relative to industry peers.
Introduction
Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) and Energy Transfer (ET) are leading master limited partnerships (MLPs) in the midstream energy sector, focusing on pipelines, storage, and natural gas liquids (NGL) processing. This stock comparison analyzes their relative performance, valuations, and market positioning amid fluctuating energy demand and commodity prices. Income-focused investors and traders seeking high-yield, stable cash flow plays in energy infrastructure will find value in understanding their contrasts, particularly as both benefit from fee-based revenues insulating against volatility. Recent sector tailwinds, including data center gas demand and export growth, underscore their appeal in today's market environment.
EPD Overview and Recent Performance
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) operates one of the largest midstream networks in the U.S., spanning NGL fractionation, crude oil and natural gas pipelines, and export terminals. With a market cap of $82 billion, it emphasizes fee-based contracts covering over 80% of revenues. In recent weeks, EPD shares rebounded toward 52-week highs near $38, driven by record Q1 results, a $4.8–$5.1 billion project backlog, and the 28th consecutive annual dividend increase to $0.55 per unit. Positive sentiment stems from strong cash flow generation, low beta of 0.50, and bullish technicals like MACD histogram crossovers and momentum above zero, despite brief overbought RSI pullbacks. Year-to-date gains stand at 22.30%, reflecting resilience in volatile oil markets.
ET Overview and Recent Performance
Energy Transfer LP (ET), with a $68.6 billion market cap, boasts an extensive pipeline system for natural gas, NGLs, and crude, including interstate and intrastate assets plus fractionation capacity. It derives 90% of EBITDA from fee-based sources. Recent market activity saw ET shares hover near 52-week highs around $20, supported by raised 2026 EBITDA guidance to $17.45–$17.85 billion and record volumes in crude transport and exports. A 3%+ distribution hike to $0.335 per unit bolstered income appeal, though EPS misses tempered gains. Bullish signals include positive momentum and 50-day moving average crossovers, offset by overbought stochastics. Year-to-date performance reached 23.19%, aided by growth capex of $5–$5.5 billion.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots, handpicked for suitability in current market conditions. These bots showcase stellar stats, including annualized returns up to 163%, win rates from 51% to 88%, profit factors exceeding 11, and profit-to-drawdown ratios over 17. Spanning strategies like trend trading, technical analysis, and take-profit/stop-loss corridors, they operate across 5-minute to 60-minute timeframes and trade diverse tickers in semiconductors (e.g., NVDA, AMD), data centers, space, industrials, and volatility plays. None currently focus on EPD or ET, but the platform's hundreds of bots cover thousands of tickers with varying styles and performances. Investors can review these high-conviction options to align with their risk tolerance and market outlook.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both EPD and ET thrive in midstream energy infrastructure, but ET pursues aggressive growth with 10%+ EBITDA targets through $5 billion+ capex, contrasting EPD's modest 3–5% growth and $5 billion backlog focus. ET's higher yield (6.70%) appeals to income seekers, yet EPD offers superior distribution coverage (1.7–1.8x) and return on equity (19%+ vs. 12%). Risk profiles differ: EPD's lower beta (0.50) and debt levels provide stability, while ET carries higher leverage (debt/equity 142%). Recent momentum favors both amid oil forecasts and pipeline demand, but EPD edges in valuation (lower EV/EBITDA) and sector outperformance.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward EPD, citing its trend consistency, lower volatility (beta 0.50), superior distribution coverage, and undervaluation metrics amid recent bullish signals like MACD positives. While ET offers higher yield and growth catalysts, EPD's stability positions it favorably for probable outperformance in risk-adjusted terms during ongoing energy sector rotation.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Mid-stream energy companies Energy Transfer (ET) and Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) compete primarily as transporters and refiners of natural gas, but they also own and lease pipelines, facilities, and other resources related to petroleum and other energy products. The companies are approximately the same size, with enterprise values around $75B, and they both call Texas home. ET’s portfolio of assets seems to be lighter-weight in petroleum and crude related assets than its counterpart, but instead seems to be more diversified with its other investments, dabbling in electrical production, timber harvesting, convenience store operations, and a broader spectrum of separation and refining activities. Otherwise, most of their financial statistics are comparable. EPD has had a slightly better dividend, but it seems that they are having to make sacrifices to keep it up. ET has a higher revenue and EBITDA, but has slightly more debt on the books pulling down its diluted EPS.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileET’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- EPD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- ET’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ET’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EPD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EPD (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -1.99% price change this week, while ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -0.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.29%.
Reported Earning Dates
EPD is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
ET is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-1.05% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| EPD | ET | EPD / ET | |
| Capitalization | 82B | 67.5B | 121% |
| EBITDA | 9.81B | 15.9B | 62% |
| Gain YTD | 21.881 | 23.240 | 94% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.04 | 16.34 | 86% |
| Revenue | 51.6B | 92.3B | 56% |
| Total Cash | 191M | 951M | 20% |
| Total Debt | 33.9B | 71.1B | 48% |
EPD | ET | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ET's Valuation (8) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (14). This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
EPD's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (11). This means that EPD’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.
EPD's SMR Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (64). This means that EPD’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.
EPD's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (47). This means that EPD’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.
ET's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (31). This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
| EPD | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 34% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 24% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 33% | 1 day ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 44% | 8 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 34% | 16 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 28% | 1 day ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 16% | 1 day ago 42% |
Advertisement
ET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ET has been loosely correlated with PAGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ET jumps, then PAGP could also see price increases.