Advertisement
EPD vs ET
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) vs. Energy Transfer (ET) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both EPD and ET are major midstream energy Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) with fee-based revenues that provide relative stability amid commodity price fluctuations.
- Recent market activity shows both stocks trading near 52-week highs, supported by record volumes, distribution increases, and positive analyst sentiment in the energy infrastructure sector.
- EPD offers strong distribution coverage and lower volatility (beta around 0.37-0.50), while ET features higher yield potential and larger-scale growth projects including export expansions.
- Leadership transitions at EPD and capital raises at ET represent key recent developments influencing investor sentiment.
- Relative performance highlights trade-offs in risk-adjusted returns, with both benefiting from U.S. energy demand growth but differing in leverage and coverage metrics.
- Market positioning favors both for income-focused investors seeking exposure to pipelines, storage, and natural gas liquids (NGL) processing.
Introduction
Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) and Energy Transfer (ET) represent two prominent players in the U.S. midstream energy sector, operating extensive networks of pipelines, storage facilities, and processing assets. This comparison examines their business models, recent performance, and relative positioning amid ongoing energy infrastructure demand. Income-oriented investors and traders focused on stable cash flows from MLPs may find this analysis relevant, particularly as both entities benefit from fee-based revenues that reduce direct exposure to commodity price swings. The review draws on observable market data and sector trends from recent weeks to provide a balanced view of their profiles without forward-looking projections.
EPD Overview and Recent Performance
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) operates as a leading midstream MLP with a focus on natural gas, crude oil, and NGL pipelines and services across the United States. The company has maintained consistent distribution growth, recently declaring a quarterly cash distribution of $0.56 per unit for the second quarter of 2026, reflecting a 2.8% year-over-year increase. Recent market activity includes record midstream volumes reported in prior quarters and adjusted EBITDA growth of approximately 10%. Leadership developments, such as the planned retirement of co-CEO A.J. Teague in January 2027 with a successor in place, have drawn attention to operational continuity. Stock behavior in recent weeks shows trading near the upper end of its 52-week range, supported by analyst target adjustments and sector tailwinds from energy export demand.
ET Overview and Recent Performance
Energy Transfer LP (ET) functions as a large-scale midstream MLP with diversified operations in natural gas transportation, storage, and related infrastructure, including export facilities. The company recently priced $1.75 billion in junior subordinated notes and announced its second-quarter 2026 earnings release scheduled for August 4. Prior periods featured raised adjusted EBITDA guidance and a legal award of $392 million related to a past event. Recent market activity reflects trading near 52-week highs amid broader energy sector momentum and project expansions. Performance indicators include solid year-to-date gains and analyst attention on growth initiatives, with the stock maintaining visibility in income portfolios due to its yield characteristics.
Trending AI Robots
Trending AI Robots showcases a curated selection from Tickeron’s extensive library of hundreds of AI trading bots that analyze and trade thousands of tickers across various markets. Only those demonstrating strong alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent backtested performance, and suitable risk parameters earn placement in this trending section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and ticker sets, with performance statistics ranging from short-term momentum approaches to longer-horizon trend-following systems. Users can explore detailed metrics on win rates, drawdowns, and profitability to identify options matching their objectives. For further details on these AI-driven tools, visit Trending AI Robots.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both EPD and ET operate in the midstream energy space with fee-based models that emphasize volume throughput over commodity prices, yet they differ in scale and strategy. ET pursues more aggressive capital expenditure programs and export-oriented growth, while EPD maintains a steadier focus on organic expansions and backlog projects. Recent momentum appears comparable amid sector-wide demand for infrastructure, though EPD exhibits lower beta and stronger distribution coverage ratios. Risk factors include ET’s higher leverage profile versus EPD’s more conservative debt metrics. Market sentiment reflects positive analyst engagement for both, with contrasts in yield levels and growth drivers shaping investor preferences for stability versus expansion potential.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, lower volatility measures, and distribution coverage, Tickeron’s AI currently indicates a probabilistic preference for EPD in relative positioning. This assessment draws from stability indicators and recent sector alignment rather than definitive outperformance expectations. ET presents complementary attributes in yield and project pipeline that may suit different risk tolerances.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Mid-stream energy companies Energy Transfer (ET) and Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) compete primarily as transporters and refiners of natural gas, but they also own and lease pipelines, facilities, and other resources related to petroleum and other energy products. The companies are approximately the same size, with enterprise values around $75B, and they both call Texas home. ET’s portfolio of assets seems to be lighter-weight in petroleum and crude related assets than its counterpart, but instead seems to be more diversified with its other investments, dabbling in electrical production, timber harvesting, convenience store operations, and a broader spectrum of separation and refining activities. Otherwise, most of their financial statistics are comparable. EPD has had a slightly better dividend, but it seems that they are having to make sacrifices to keep it up. ET has a higher revenue and EBITDA, but has slightly more debt on the books pulling down its diluted EPS.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileET’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- EPD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- ET’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ET’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EPD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- ET’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EPD (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +1.41% price change this week, while ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +1.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
EPD is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
ET is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+2.19% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| EPD | ET | EPD / ET | |
| Capitalization | 80.6B | 67.7B | 119% |
| EBITDA | 9.81B | 15.9B | 62% |
| Gain YTD | 19.855 | 23.554 | 84% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.80 | 16.38 | 84% |
| Revenue | 51.6B | 92.3B | 56% |
| Total Cash | 191M | 951M | 20% |
| Total Debt | 33.9B | 71.1B | 48% |
EPD | ET | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ET's Valuation (2) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (11). This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
EPD's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (15). This means that EPD’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.
EPD's SMR Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (66). This means that EPD’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.
ET's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (48). This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
ET's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (34). This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
| EPD | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 30% | 2 days ago 32% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 11% | 2 days ago 36% |
Advertisement
EPD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPD has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPD jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.