Advertisement
EPD vs ET
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) vs. Energy Transfer (ET) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both EPD and ET are major midstream energy partnerships focused on oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids (NGL) infrastructure.
- EPD delivered record second-quarter 2026 adjusted EBITDA and raised its distribution, supporting steady unit price stability near $38.
- ET posted stronger year-to-date total returns of approximately 27.7% compared with roughly 19% for EPD as of mid-July 2026.
- ET offers a higher distribution yield near 6.65% at prices around $20, while EPD trades at a higher absolute price level with a more conservative leverage profile.
- Growth drivers differ, with EPD emphasizing broad NGL and petrochemical exposure and ET highlighting natural gas infrastructure and export-oriented projects.
- Market sentiment reflects slightly more frequent analyst upgrades for ET alongside EPD’s distribution announcement in recent market activity.
Introduction
Midstream energy master limited partnerships (MLPs) such as Enterprise Products Partners and Energy Transfer provide essential pipeline and storage infrastructure for hydrocarbons. Investors and traders often compare EPD and ET to evaluate relative performance, distribution yields, and sector positioning within the energy value chain. This analysis examines recent stock behavior, business models, and market dynamics to assist those seeking income-generating assets or exposure to energy infrastructure trends. The comparison is relevant for income-focused investors, sector rotation strategies, and traders monitoring relative strength in the midstream space.
EPD Overview and Recent Performance
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. operates one of the largest midstream networks in North America, transporting, storing, and processing natural gas, crude oil, and NGLs. In recent weeks, the partnership reported strong second-quarter 2026 results, including record adjusted EBITDA and a distribution increase. The unit price has shown resilience near the upper end of its 52-week range, closing around $38.05 after a year-to-date gain of approximately 24%. Broader market activity has been influenced by steady volume growth and favorable energy fundamentals, contributing to positive sentiment despite occasional post-earnings volatility. Overall, EPD has maintained consistent performance with limited downside in recent market activity.
ET Overview and Recent Performance
Energy Transfer LP manages an extensive portfolio of natural gas, crude oil, and NGL pipelines, terminals, and export facilities across the United States. Recent market activity has featured continued infrastructure expansion and volume growth, supporting a year-to-date total return near 27.7% as of mid-July 2026. The unit price has traded around $20 with a distribution yield near 6.65%. Sentiment has benefited from analyst attention and project milestones, though the partnership carries higher leverage compared with peers. Performance in recent weeks reflects broader energy sector stability and investor interest in higher-yielding midstream names.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the most suitable AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Bots vary widely in trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with comprehensive forward-testing statistics including annualized returns, Sharpe ratios, profit factors, and drawdown measures. The platform highlights top performers selected from a pool of over 350 total robots, enabling users to review real-time trade alerts and historical results. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to identify bots matching specific risk tolerances and market outlooks.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both partnerships operate in the midstream sector with overlapping exposure to energy transportation and storage, yet differences emerge in scale and focus. Enterprise Products Partners emphasizes diversified NGL and petrochemical volumes with a track record of distribution growth, while Energy Transfer prioritizes natural gas infrastructure and export capacity. Recent momentum favors ET on a total-return basis, though EPD exhibits greater price stability. Risk considerations include regulatory and interest-rate sensitivity for both, with ET carrying higher debt levels that may appeal to yield seekers but introduce different leverage dynamics. Market sentiment has shown modestly more upgrades for ET in recent activity, contrasting EPD’s emphasis on earnings consistency.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as stronger year-to-date total returns, higher distribution yield, and recent analyst momentum, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a probabilistic edge to ET over EPD in trend consistency and relative positioning. This assessment reflects data-driven comparisons of performance metrics and catalysts without implying certainty in future outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Mid-stream energy companies Energy Transfer (ET) and Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) compete primarily as transporters and refiners of natural gas, but they also own and lease pipelines, facilities, and other resources related to petroleum and other energy products. The companies are approximately the same size, with enterprise values around $75B, and they both call Texas home. ET’s portfolio of assets seems to be lighter-weight in petroleum and crude related assets than its counterpart, but instead seems to be more diversified with its other investments, dabbling in electrical production, timber harvesting, convenience store operations, and a broader spectrum of separation and refining activities. Otherwise, most of their financial statistics are comparable. EPD has had a slightly better dividend, but it seems that they are having to make sacrifices to keep it up. ET has a higher revenue and EBITDA, but has slightly more debt on the books pulling down its diluted EPS.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileET’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- EPD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- ET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ET’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EPD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EPD (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +1.08% price change this week, while ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +0.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.14%.
Reported Earning Dates
EPD is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
ET is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.73% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| EPD | ET | EPD / ET | |
| Capitalization | 82.1B | 72.9B | 113% |
| EBITDA | 9.81B | 17.4B | 56% |
| Gain YTD | 24.057 | 35.397 | 68% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.15 | 14.51 | 91% |
| Revenue | 51.6B | 107B | 48% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 33.9B | 71.1B | 48% |
EPD | ET | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ET's Valuation (8) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (10). This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
EPD's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (8). This means that EPD’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.
EPD's SMR Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ET (99). This means that EPD’s stock grew somewhat faster than ET’s over the last 12 months.
ET's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (49). This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
EPD's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (38). This means that EPD’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.
| EPD | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% | 2 days ago 36% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 19% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 45% | 11 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 31% | 27 days ago 40% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
EPD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPD has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPD jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.