Advertisement
EPD vs ET
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) vs. Energy Transfer (ET) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both EPD and ET are major midstream energy master limited partnerships (MLPs) focused on pipelines and logistics for oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids (NGLs).
- EPD recently raised its quarterly distribution by 2.8% to $0.56 per unit amid record midstream volumes reported in Q1 2026 earnings.
- ET has delivered stronger year-to-date total return of approximately 27.7% compared to EPD's roughly 19% as of mid-July 2026.
- Analyst sentiment remains constructive for both, with multiple price target increases and ratings in the hold-to-buy range over recent weeks.
- EPD trades at a higher absolute price level near $38.20, while ET offers a higher distribution yield around 6.65% near $20.32.
- Leadership transitions and infrastructure expansions represent key recent catalysts influencing market positioning for each entity.
Introduction
Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) and Energy Transfer (ET) represent two leading midstream energy MLPs that transport and process hydrocarbons through extensive pipeline networks. This comparison examines their recent stock behavior, operational developments, and relative positioning within the energy sector. Income-oriented investors seeking stable distributions, as well as those focused on energy infrastructure exposure, may find the analysis relevant for assessing diversification opportunities or tactical allocation decisions in the current market environment.
EPD Overview and Recent Performance
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. operates one of the largest midstream networks in North America, handling crude oil, natural gas, NGLs, and petrochemicals. In recent market activity, the stock has shown resilience, closing near $38.20-$38.25 as of July 17, 2026, with modest daily gains amid broader sector movements. The company announced a 2.8% increase in its quarterly cash distribution to $0.56 per unit in early July, supported by strong Q1 2026 results that included record volumes and an 8% rise in operating income. Year-to-date performance stands at approximately 19%, with a 1-year return near 22.6%. Analyst coverage has included several upward price target revisions, reflecting confidence in volumetric growth and infrastructure stability.
ET Overview and Recent Performance
Energy Transfer LP manages an extensive portfolio of natural gas, crude oil, and NGL pipelines, along with related assets. As of July 17, 2026, the stock traded near $20.32, posting gains in recent sessions. The entity has achieved a year-to-date total return of about 27.7%, outperforming the broader market, alongside a distribution yield near 6.65%. Recent developments include the pricing of $1.75 billion in junior subordinated notes and announcements of export expansion projects. Q1 operational metrics highlighted revenue growth, while analyst actions over recent weeks have featured multiple price target increases and rating affirmations in the hold-to-buy spectrum.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a library of hundreds that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with statistics such as win rates, profit factors, and drawdown levels varying across the platform. This diversity allows users to explore options suited to different risk tolerances and market views. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed performance data.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both entities operate similar midstream business models centered on fee-based transportation and storage, providing relative insulation from direct commodity price swings compared to upstream producers. Growth drivers differ modestly: EPD emphasizes broad NGL and petrochemical exposure with consistent distribution growth, while ET highlights natural gas infrastructure and recent export-oriented projects. Recent momentum favors ET on a total-return basis, though EPD exhibits steadier price stability near its 52-week range. Risk factors include regulatory and interest-rate sensitivity for both, with ET carrying a higher yield that may appeal to income investors but potentially signals different leverage dynamics. Sector exposure remains comparable, though market sentiment has reflected slightly more frequent analyst upgrades for ET in recent weeks alongside EPD’s distribution announcement.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, distribution stability, and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to EPD. The stock’s record volumes, measured distribution increases, and lower volatility profile contribute to this assessment, though ET’s stronger year-to-date performance and yield present competitive trade-offs that could shift the balance depending on evolving catalysts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Mid-stream energy companies Energy Transfer (ET) and Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) compete primarily as transporters and refiners of natural gas, but they also own and lease pipelines, facilities, and other resources related to petroleum and other energy products. The companies are approximately the same size, with enterprise values around $75B, and they both call Texas home. ET’s portfolio of assets seems to be lighter-weight in petroleum and crude related assets than its counterpart, but instead seems to be more diversified with its other investments, dabbling in electrical production, timber harvesting, convenience store operations, and a broader spectrum of separation and refining activities. Otherwise, most of their financial statistics are comparable. EPD has had a slightly better dividend, but it seems that they are having to make sacrifices to keep it up. ET has a higher revenue and EBITDA, but has slightly more debt on the books pulling down its diluted EPS.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileET’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- EPD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- ET’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ET’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EPD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- ET’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EPD (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -0.29% price change this week, while ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.49%.
Reported Earning Dates
EPD is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
ET is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-0.80% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| EPD | ET | EPD / ET | |
| Capitalization | 82.3B | 70.1B | 117% |
| EBITDA | 9.81B | 15.9B | 62% |
| Gain YTD | 24.188 | 27.953 | 87% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.17 | 16.97 | 78% |
| Revenue | 51.6B | 92.3B | 56% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 951M | - |
| Total Debt | 33.9B | 71.1B | 48% |
EPD | ET | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ET's Valuation (2) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (11). This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
EPD's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (11). This means that EPD’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.
EPD's SMR Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (66). This means that EPD’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.
ET's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (46). This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
ET's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (35). This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
| EPD | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 47% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 27% | 1 day ago 30% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 29% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 31% | 6 days ago 40% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 30% | 1 day ago 54% |
Advertisement
EPD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPD has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPD jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.
ET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ET has been loosely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ET jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.