ET
Price
$17.28
Change
-$0.34 (-1.93%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
59.32B
80 days until earnings call
PAGP
Price
$19.24
Change
-$0.05 (-0.26%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
3.8B
81 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ET vs PAGP

Header iconET vs PAGP Comparison
Open Charts ET vs PAGPBanner chart's image
Energy Transfer
Price$17.28
Change-$0.34 (-1.93%)
Volume$15.42M
Capitalization59.32B
Plains GP Holdings
Price$19.24
Change-$0.05 (-0.26%)
Volume$1.69M
Capitalization3.8B
ET vs PAGP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ET vs. PAGP commentary
Aug 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ET is a Hold and PAGP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2025
Stock price -- (ET: $17.28 vs. PAGP: $19.24)
Brand notoriety: ET and PAGP are both notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ET: 117% vs. PAGP: 114%
Market capitalization -- ET: $59.32B vs. PAGP: $3.8B
ET [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $59.32B. PAGP’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $3.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $102.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAGP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PAGP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ET and PAGP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ET’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAGP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ET’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PAGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAGP is a better buy in the short-term than ET.

Price Growth

ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -1.01% price change this week, while PAGP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -1.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

ET is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

PAGP is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.49% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ET($59.3B) has a higher market cap than PAGP($3.81B). PAGP has higher P/E ratio than ET: PAGP (26.36) vs ET (13.40). PAGP YTD gains are higher at: 10.856 vs. ET (-6.895). ET has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.2B vs. PAGP (2.9B). PAGP has less debt than ET: PAGP (8.98B) vs ET (60.6B). ET has higher revenues than PAGP: ET (80.6B) vs PAGP (50.1B).
ETPAGPET / PAGP
Capitalization59.3B3.81B1,558%
EBITDA15.2B2.9B524%
Gain YTD-6.89510.856-64%
P/E Ratio13.4026.3651%
Revenue80.6B50.1B161%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt60.6B8.98B675%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ET vs PAGP: Fundamental Ratings
ET
PAGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8478
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
128
SMR RATING
1..100
10068
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5322
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ET's Valuation (26) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAGP (52). This means that ET’s stock grew similarly to PAGP’s over the last 12 months.

PAGP's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (12). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

PAGP's SMR Rating (68) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (100). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

PAGP's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (56). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

PAGP's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ET (53). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETPAGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STMZF14.700.18
+1.25%
Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust PLC
FBCG51.190.49
+0.96%
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
IYZ30.510.22
+0.73%
iShares US Telecommunications ETF
LOWV75.940.46
+0.61%
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
XNAV73.49N/A
N/A
FundX Aggressive ETF

PAGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGP has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 98% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGP jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAGP
1D Price
Change %
PAGP100%
-0.26%
PAA - PAGP
98%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
EPD - PAGP
75%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
ET - PAGP
74%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
OKE - PAGP
72%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
TRGP - PAGP
71%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
More