Advertisement
FANG vs TPL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a Hold and TPL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FANG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTPL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TPL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FANG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FANG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +2.42% price change this week, while TPL (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -10.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
FANG is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.
TPL is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (-1.10% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| FANG | TPL | FANG / TPL | |
| Capitalization | 42.6B | 20.8B | 205% |
| EBITDA | 10.8B | 607M | 1,779% |
| Gain YTD | -6.665 | -17.751 | 38% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.44 | 43.76 | 24% |
| Revenue | 15.3B | 743M | 2,059% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 544M | - |
| Total Debt | 15.1B | 453K | 3,333,333% |
FANG | TPL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 25 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 17 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FANG's Valuation (66) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as TPL (84) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to TPL’s over the last 12 months.
FANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as TPL (49) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to TPL’s over the last 12 months.
TPL's SMR Rating (25) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is significantly better than the same rating for FANG (91) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that TPL’s stock grew significantly faster than FANG’s over the last 12 months.
FANG's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as TPL (63) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to TPL’s over the last 12 months.
FANG's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TPL (88) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than TPL’s over the last 12 months.
| FANG | TPL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 72% | 14 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 59% | 1 day ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 76% |
Advertisement
FANG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FANG has been closely correlated with CHRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FANG jumps, then CHRD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FANG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FANG | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| CHRD - FANG | 89% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| DVN - FANG | 89% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| PR - FANG | 89% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| OVV - FANG | 88% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| MTDR - FANG | 87% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||
TPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPL has been loosely correlated with FANG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TPL jumps, then FANG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPL | 100% | -1.56% | ||
| FANG - TPL | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| PR - TPL | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| OVV - TPL | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| CHRD - TPL | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| MGY - TPL | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
More | ||||