Ad is loading...
FCOM vs XLC
FCOM vs XLC Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs XLC
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$60.59
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
Volume$6.11K
Net Assets1.42B
The Comm Svcs Sel Sect SPDR® ETF
Price$99.24
Change+$0.97 (+0.99%)
Volume$110.94K
Net Assets20.72B
FCOM vs XLC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. XLC commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and XLC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLC has more net assets: 20.7B vs. FCOM (1.43B). FCOM has a higher annual dividend yield than XLC: FCOM (3.186) vs XLC (2.520). FCOM was incepted earlier than XLC: FCOM (11 years) vs XLC (7 years). XLC has a higher turnover FCOM (18.00) vs FCOM (18.00).
| FCOM | XLC | FCOM / XLC | |
| Gain YTD | 3.186 | 2.520 | 126% |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 20.7B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 28.00 | 64% |
| Yield | 0.75 | 0.81 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 71% | 16 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 88% | 18 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 78% | 16 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| META - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| LBRDA - FCOM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||
XLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLC | 100% | +1.00% | ||
| META - XLC | 78% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| GOOGL - XLC | 76% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| GOOG - XLC | 76% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| NWSA - XLC | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| NWS - XLC | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
More | ||||