Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
FCOM vs XLC
FCOM vs XLC Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs XLC
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$57.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$61.2K
CapitalizationN/A
The Comm Svcs Sel Sect SPDR® ETF
Price$97.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.83M
CapitalizationN/A
FCOM vs XLC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. XLC commentary
Nov 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Sell and XLC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLC has more net assets: 19.8B vs. FCOM (1.31B). XLC has a higher annual dividend yield than FCOM: XLC (34.747) vs FCOM (31.142). FCOM was incepted earlier than XLC: FCOM (11 years) vs XLC (6 years). XLC has a higher turnover FCOM (18.00) vs FCOM (18.00).
| FCOM | XLC | FCOM / XLC | |
| Gain YTD | 31.142 | 34.747 | 90% |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 19.8B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 28.00 | 64% |
| Yield | 0.75 | 0.81 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 78% | 8 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | -0.46% | ||
| META - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 76% Closely correlated | -4.56% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 75% Closely correlated | -4.74% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.34% | ||
| LBRDA - FCOM | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
More | ||||
XLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLC | 100% | -0.26% | ||
| META - XLC | 78% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| GOOGL - XLC | 76% Closely correlated | -4.74% | ||
| GOOG - XLC | 76% Closely correlated | -4.56% | ||
| NWSA - XLC | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.34% | ||
| NWS - XLC | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
More | ||||