Ad is loading...
FCOM vs XLC
FCOM vs XLC Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs XLC
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$54.52
Change-$2.12 (-3.74%)
Volume$831
Net Assets1.38B
The Comm Svcs Sel Sect SPDR® ETF
Price$93.63
Change-$3.22 (-3.32%)
Volume$6.75K
Net Assets20.33B
FCOM vs XLC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. XLC commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Buy and XLC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLC has more net assets: 20.3B vs. FCOM (1.39B). XLC has a higher annual dividend yield than FCOM: XLC (0.337) vs FCOM (-3.275). FCOM was incepted earlier than XLC: FCOM (11 years) vs XLC (7 years). XLC (0.08) and FCOM (0.08) have comparable expense ratios . XLC has a higher turnover FCOM (21.00) vs FCOM (21.00).
| FCOM | XLC | FCOM / XLC | |
| Gain YTD | -3.275 | 0.337 | -971% |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 20.3B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 105% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 28.00 | 75% |
| Yield | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 79% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| META - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| LBRDA - FCOM | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.32% | ||
More | ||||
XLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLC | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| META - XLC | 78% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| GOOGL - XLC | 76% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| GOOG - XLC | 76% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| NWSA - XLC | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| NWS - XLC | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
More | ||||