Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOM vs XLC
FCOM vs XLC Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs XLC
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$68.26
Change-$0.18 (-0.26%)
Volume$100
Net Assets1.76B
The Comm Svcs Sel Sect SPDR® ETF
Price$111.50
Change-$0.31 (-0.28%)
Volume$1.01K
Net Assets25.22B
FCOM vs XLC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. XLC commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and XLC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLC has more net assets: 25.2B vs. FCOM (1.76B). FCOM has a higher annual dividend yield than XLC: FCOM (17.481) vs XLC (16.522). FCOM was incepted earlier than XLC: FCOM (12 years) vs XLC (7 years). XLC (0.08) and FCOM (0.08) have comparable expense ratios . XLC has a higher turnover FCOM (13.00) vs FCOM (13.00).
| FCOM | XLC | FCOM / XLC | |
| Gain YTD | 17.481 | 16.522 | 106% |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 25.2B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 105% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 25.00 | 52% |
| Yield | 0.88 | 1.05 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 9 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| META - FCOM | 84% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| ROKU - FCOM | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| DIS - FCOM | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
More | ||||
XLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLC | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| META - XLC | 76% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| NWSA - XLC | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| GOOG - XLC | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| GOOGL - XLC | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| DIS - XLC | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
More | ||||