Advertisement
FDS vs IPG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a StrongBuy and IPG is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FDS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIPG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FDS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- IPG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FDS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IPG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FDS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- IPG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FDS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.09% price change this week, while IPG (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price change was -4.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +96.41%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was -2.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.47%.
Reported Earning Dates
FDS is expected to report earnings on Jun 23, 2025.
IPG is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.85% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Advertising/Marketing Services (-2.70% weekly)Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.
| FDS | IPG | FDS / IPG | |
| Capitalization | 16.9B | 12.3B | 137% |
| EBITDA | 805M | 1.9B | 42% |
| Gain YTD | -3.104 | -13.086 | 24% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.83 | 11.40 | 314% |
| Revenue | 2.12B | 10.9B | 19% |
| Total Cash | 28.4M | 2.39B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 1.77B | 4.67B | 38% |
FDS | IPG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IPG's Valuation (8) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FDS (92) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that IPG’s stock grew significantly faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as IPG (51) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to IPG’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's SMR Rating (33) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as IPG (57) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to IPG’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as IPG (60) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to IPG’s over the last 12 months.
IPG's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDS (58) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that IPG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.
| FDS | IPG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 58% | 8 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 65% |
Advertisement
FDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been closely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDS | 100% | N/A | ||
| MORN - FDS | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| MCO - FDS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| NDAQ - FDS | 60% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SPGI - FDS | 59% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MSCI - FDS | 54% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
IPG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPG has been closely correlated with OMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPG jumps, then OMC could also see price increases.