FDS
Price
$283.49
Change
-$3.69 (-1.28%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
10.08B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MSCI
Price
$569.13
Change
-$6.11 (-1.06%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
41.38B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDS vs MSCI

FDS vs MSCI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDS vs. MSCI commentary
Aug 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a Hold and MSCI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2026
Stock price -- (FDS: $283.49 vs. MSCI: $569.13)
Brand notoriety: FDS and MSCI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDS: 137% vs. MSCI: 74%
Market capitalization -- FDS: $10.08B vs. MSCI: $41.38B
FDS [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $10.08B. MSCI’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $41.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $123.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $39.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSCI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSCI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the long-term than MSCI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSCI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MSCI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSCI is a better buy in the short-term than FDS.

Price Growth

FDS (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -0.73% price change this week, while MSCI (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +1.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDS is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2026.

MSCI is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.38% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSCI($41.4B) has a higher market cap than FDS($10.1B). MSCI has higher P/E ratio than FDS: MSCI (31.12) vs FDS (18.68). MSCI YTD gains are higher at: 0.306 vs. FDS (-1.326). MSCI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.07B vs. FDS (956M). FDS has less debt than MSCI: FDS (1.57B) vs MSCI (6.52B). MSCI has higher revenues than FDS: MSCI (3.33B) vs FDS (2.44B).
FDSMSCIFDS / MSCI
Capitalization10.1B41.4B24%
EBITDA956M2.07B46%
Gain YTD-1.3260.306-433%
P/E Ratio18.6831.1260%
Revenue2.44B3.33B73%
Total Cash304MN/A-
Total Debt1.57B6.52B24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDS vs MSCI: Fundamental Ratings
FDS
MSCI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
756
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
375
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8367
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSCI's Valuation (8) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (33). This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (100). This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's SMR Rating (5) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (37). This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MSCI (58). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MSCI’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (83). This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSMSCI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MSCI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VNET7.600.15
+2.01%
VNET Group
RMBS100.851.52
+1.53%
Rambus
UYSCU11.49N/A
N/A
Uy Scuti Acquisition Corp
CWH6.41-0.12
-1.84%
Camping World Holdings
WSHP4.88-0.17
-3.37%
WeShop Holdings Ltd

FDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been loosely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDS
1D Price
Change %
FDS100%
-1.28%
SPGI - FDS
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
MCO - FDS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
MSCI - FDS
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
HLI - FDS
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.67%
SCHW - FDS
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
More

MSCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSCI has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MSCI jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSCI
1D Price
Change %
MSCI100%
-0.71%
SPGI - MSCI
71%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
MCO - MSCI
70%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
MORN - MSCI
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
NDAQ - MSCI
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
JEF - MSCI
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
More