FDS
Price
$367.09
Change
-$3.71 (-1.00%)
Updated
Sep 4, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.02B
14 days until earnings call
MORN
Price
$255.38
Change
-$0.49 (-0.19%)
Updated
Sep 4, 11:27 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.78B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDS vs MORN

Header iconFDS vs MORN Comparison
Open Charts FDS vs MORNBanner chart's image
Factset Research Systems
Price$367.09
Change-$3.71 (-1.00%)
Volume$411
Capitalization14.02B
Morningstar
Price$255.38
Change-$0.49 (-0.19%)
Volume$100
Capitalization10.78B
FDS vs MORN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MORN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDS vs. MORN commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a Hold and MORN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FDS: $370.80 vs. MORN: $255.68)
Brand notoriety: FDS and MORN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDS: 80% vs. MORN: 89%
Market capitalization -- FDS: $14.02B vs. MORN: $10.78B
FDS [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $14.02B. MORN’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $10.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $164.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMORN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FDS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MORN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MORN is a better buy in the long-term than FDS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MORN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MORN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the short-term than MORN.

Price Growth

FDS (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -2.19% price change this week, while MORN (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -3.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDS is expected to report earnings on Sep 18, 2025.

MORN is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-2.58% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDS($14B) has a higher market cap than MORN($10.8B). MORN (27.23) and FDS (26.75) have similar P/E ratio . FDS YTD gains are higher at: -22.207 vs. MORN (-23.737). FDS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 888M vs. MORN (772M). MORN has more cash in the bank: 542M vs. FDS (28.9M). MORN has less debt than FDS: MORN (1.03B) vs FDS (1.62B). MORN (2.35B) and FDS (2.29B) have equivalent revenues.
FDSMORNFDS / MORN
Capitalization14B10.8B130%
EBITDA888M772M115%
Gain YTD-22.207-23.73794%
P/E Ratio26.7527.2398%
Revenue2.29B2.35B97%
Total Cash28.9M542M5%
Total Debt1.62B1.03B157%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDS vs MORN: Fundamental Ratings
FDS
MORN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
959
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7962
SMR RATING
1..100
3635
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6482
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7294
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MORN's Valuation (66) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (68). This means that MORN’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

MORN's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (79). This means that MORN’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

MORN's SMR Rating (35) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (36). This means that MORN’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (82). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (94). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSMORN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MORN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISPY43.500.34
+0.79%
ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF
BAUG47.830.13
+0.26%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF Aug
DXD23.220.05
+0.22%
ProShares UltraShort Dow30
AUDJPY96.82N/A
N/A
Australian Dollar - Japan Yen
CNYGBP0.10N/A
N/A
China Yuan - United Kingdom Pound

FDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been loosely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDS
1D Price
Change %
FDS100%
+0.52%
MORN - FDS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
MCO - FDS
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
SPGI - FDS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
NDAQ - FDS
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
MSCI - FDS
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
More

MORN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MORN has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MORN jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MORN
1D Price
Change %
MORN100%
-0.12%
MCO - MORN
74%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
SPGI - MORN
70%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
NDAQ - MORN
68%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
MSCI - MORN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
TRU - MORN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
More