FDS
Price
$277.30
Change
-$0.11 (-0.04%)
Updated
Nov 28, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.38B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MORN
Price
$214.86
Change
+$1.14 (+0.53%)
Updated
Nov 28, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.79B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDS vs MORN

Header iconFDS vs MORN Comparison
Open Charts FDS vs MORNBanner chart's image
Factset Research Systems
Price$277.30
Change-$0.11 (-0.04%)
Volume$40
Capitalization10.38B
Morningstar
Price$214.86
Change+$1.14 (+0.53%)
Volume$21.95K
Capitalization8.79B
FDS vs MORN Comparison Chart in %
FDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MORN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDS vs. MORN commentary
Nov 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a StrongBuy and MORN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FDS: $277.41 vs. MORN: $213.72)
Brand notoriety: FDS and MORN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDS: 51% vs. MORN: 56%
Market capitalization -- FDS: $10.38B vs. MORN: $8.79B
FDS [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $10.38B. MORN’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $8.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $150.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMORN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FDS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MORN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the long-term than MORN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MORN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MORN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the short-term than MORN.

Price Growth

FDS (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +3.89% price change this week, while MORN (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +1.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +2.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDS is expected to report earnings on Dec 18, 2025.

MORN is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+2.70% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDS($10.4B) has a higher market cap than MORN($8.8B). MORN has higher P/E ratio than FDS: MORN (24.31) vs FDS (17.84). MORN YTD gains are higher at: -36.124 vs. FDS (-41.800). FDS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 966M vs. MORN (742M). MORN has more cash in the bank: 514M vs. FDS (355M). MORN has less debt than FDS: MORN (1.04B) vs FDS (1.56B). MORN (2.4B) and FDS (2.32B) have equivalent revenues.
FDSMORNFDS / MORN
Capitalization10.4B8.8B118%
EBITDA966M742M130%
Gain YTD-41.800-36.124116%
P/E Ratio17.8424.3173%
Revenue2.32B2.4B97%
Total Cash355M514M69%
Total Debt1.56B1.04B149%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDS vs MORN: Fundamental Ratings
FDS
MORN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10084
SMR RATING
1..100
3338
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6581
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9392
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FDS's Valuation (31) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (54). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

MORN's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (100). This means that MORN’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's SMR Rating (33) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (38). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (81). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

MORN's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (93). This means that MORN’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSMORN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MORN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIDUX8.330.05
+0.60%
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Div & Prem R6
USDJPY156.24N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - Japan Yen
CHFEUR1.07N/A
N/A
Switzerland Franc - Euro
EURCNY8.21N/A
N/A
Euro - China Yuan
HKDNZD0.23N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - New Zealand Dollar

FDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been closely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDS
1D Price
Change %
FDS100%
-0.47%
MORN - FDS
66%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
SPGI - FDS
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
MCO - FDS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
NDAQ - FDS
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
ICE - FDS
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
More

MORN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MORN has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MORN jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MORN
1D Price
Change %
MORN100%
+0.08%
MCO - MORN
74%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
SPGI - MORN
72%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
NDAQ - MORN
71%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
FDS - MORN
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
MSCI - MORN
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
More