Ad is loading...
FDS
Price
$483.90
Change
-$11.82 (-2.38%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
30 days until earnings call
MORN
Price
$337.57
Change
-$5.42 (-1.58%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
95 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FDS vs MORN

Header iconFDS vs MORN Comparison
Open Charts FDS vs MORNBanner chart's image
Factset Research Systems
Price$483.90
Change-$11.82 (-2.38%)
Volume$375.39K
CapitalizationN/A
Morningstar
Price$337.57
Change-$5.42 (-1.58%)
Volume$128.76K
CapitalizationN/A
FDS vs MORN Comparison Chart
Loading...
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MORN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDS vs. MORN commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a StrongSell and MORN is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FDS: $483.90 vs. MORN: $337.57)
Brand notoriety: FDS and MORN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDS: 136% vs. MORN: 95%
Market capitalization -- FDS: $16.87B vs. MORN: $13.18B
FDS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $16.87B. MORN’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $13.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMORN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FDS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MORN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FDS and MORN are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MORN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MORN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the short-term than MORN.

Price Growth

FDS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.35% price change this week, while MORN (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -3.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDS is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2024.

MORN is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.23% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDS($16.9B) has a higher market cap than MORN($13.2B). MORN has higher P/E ratio than FDS: MORN (93.13) vs FDS (35.83). MORN YTD gains are higher at: 18.576 vs. FDS (2.167). FDS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 805M vs. MORN (427M). MORN has more cash in the bank: 389M vs. FDS (28.4M). MORN has less debt than FDS: MORN (1.16B) vs FDS (1.77B). FDS (2.12B) and MORN (2.04B) have equivalent revenues.
FDSMORNFDS / MORN
Capitalization16.9B13.2B128%
EBITDA805M427M189%
Gain YTD2.16718.57612%
P/E Ratio35.8393.1338%
Revenue2.12B2.04B104%
Total Cash28.4M389M7%
Total Debt1.77B1.16B153%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDS vs MORN: Fundamental Ratings
FDS
MORN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3866
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1628
SMR RATING
1..100
3241
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7699
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MORN's Valuation (84) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (94). This means that MORN’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (28). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's SMR Rating (32) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (41). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (48). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (99). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSMORN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MORN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNEX97.271.46
+1.52%
StoneX Group
TANH0.16N/A
-0.69%
Tantech Holdings Ltd
STN82.31-0.62
-0.75%
Stantec
VOC5.07-0.12
-2.31%
VOC Energy Trust
BYND5.14-0.16
-3.02%
Beyond Meat

FDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been loosely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDS
1D Price
Change %
FDS100%
-2.38%
MORN - FDS
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
SPGI - FDS
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
MCO - FDS
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
MSCI - FDS
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
NDAQ - FDS
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
More

MORN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MORN has been loosely correlated with NDAQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MORN jumps, then NDAQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MORN
1D Price
Change %
MORN100%
-1.58%
NDAQ - MORN
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
MCO - MORN
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
SPGI - MORN
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
JEF - MORN
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
PIPR - MORN
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
More