73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTS vs MT
FDTS vs MT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTS vs. MT commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTS is a Buy and MT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MT: Fundamental Ratings
MT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDTS | MT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | N/A | ||
| MT - FDTS | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.32% | ||
| CE - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | +8.84% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.96% | ||
| CTS - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | +4.81% | ||
| KAR - FDTS | 50% Loosely correlated | +3.51% | ||
More | ||||
MT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MT has been loosely correlated with CLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MT jumps, then CLF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y