FELG vs QCOM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FELG is a Hold and QCOM is a Hold.
QCOM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FELG | QCOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 71% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KDA.X | 0.392664 | 0.015203 | +4.03% |
| Kadena cryptocurrency | |||
| ZEC.X | 38.953620 | 0.070068 | +0.18% |
| Zcash cryptocurrency | |||
| VEN.X | 0.016788 | N/A | N/A |
| ImpulseVen cryptocurrency | |||
| PYR.X | 1.058136 | -0.091897 | -7.99% |
| Vulcan Forged (PYR) cryptocurrency | |||
| LTO.X | 0.034178 | -0.014529 | -29.83% |
| LTO Network cryptocurrency | |||
FELG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FELG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FELG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FELG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FELG | 100% | -6.08% | ||
| AMZN - FELG | 78% Closely correlated | -8.98% | ||
| NVDA - FELG | 78% Closely correlated | -7.81% | ||
| MSFT - FELG | 76% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| KLAC - FELG | 73% Closely correlated | -9.53% | ||
| QCOM - FELG | 73% Closely correlated | -9.51% | ||
More | ||||
QCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCOM has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCOM jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 100% | -9.51% | ||
| KLAC - QCOM | 75% Closely correlated | -9.53% | ||
| AMAT - QCOM | 75% Closely correlated | -8.28% | ||
| LRCX - QCOM | 74% Closely correlated | -11.60% | ||
| RMBS - QCOM | 71% Closely correlated | -12.40% | ||
| AMKR - QCOM | 71% Closely correlated | -14.95% | ||
More | ||||