Advertisement
AMAT vs QCOM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Qualcomm (QCOM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- AMAT operates in semiconductor manufacturing equipment and has shown strong year-to-date gains amid sustained AI-related demand for advanced chip production tools.
- QCOM focuses on wireless technology and semiconductors, with recent quarterly results reflecting handset market pressures offset by diversification into automotive and IoT segments.
- Recent market activity has seen both stocks experience volatility, with AMAT benefiting from equipment cycle tailwinds and QCOM navigating supply constraints in memory components.
- Sector exposure differs notably: AMAT is tied closely to capital expenditure cycles in chip fabrication, while QCOM derives significant revenue from licensing and mobile ecosystems.
- Upcoming catalysts include AMAT’s fiscal third-quarter earnings report scheduled for mid-August, following QCOM’s recent results that met expectations but featured cautious guidance.
- Relative performance highlights trade-offs between growth momentum in equipment and stability in diversified technology platforms.
Introduction
Applied Materials (AMAT) and Qualcomm (QCOM) represent two distinct segments of the semiconductor and technology value chain. AMAT supplies equipment essential for chip fabrication, while QCOM develops processors and connectivity solutions primarily for mobile and connected devices. This comparison provides traders and investors with a framework for evaluating relative positioning in the current environment, where AI infrastructure spending, supply chain dynamics, and end-market demand influence performance. Institutional and retail participants monitoring semiconductor cycles or seeking exposure across equipment and design segments may find the analysis relevant for portfolio construction and risk assessment.
AMAT Overview and Recent Performance
Applied Materials designs and manufactures equipment used in the production of semiconductors, displays, and related technologies. In recent weeks, the stock has exhibited resilience amid broader market fluctuations, supported by ongoing demand for tools that enable advanced node manufacturing tied to artificial intelligence applications. Analysts have maintained generally constructive views, citing visibility into multi-quarter order backlogs despite geopolitical considerations around export controls. Recent market activity reflects elevated valuations relative to historical averages, with the shares trading near multi-year highs before some consolidation. Sentiment has been influenced by positive commentary on long-term AI chip demand alongside periodic concerns over customer concentration in certain regions.
QCOM Overview and Recent Performance
Qualcomm develops and licenses wireless technologies, with a core presence in mobile processors and a growing footprint in automotive, infrastructure, and Internet of Things applications. In recent market activity, the stock responded to fiscal third-quarter results that aligned with consensus revenue and earnings estimates, though management highlighted ongoing memory supply constraints affecting near-term outlook. Guidance for the subsequent quarter reflected these headwinds, contributing to measured investor reactions. Broader sentiment has incorporated the company’s efforts to raise pricing and streamline operations while advancing diversification initiatives. Performance has remained sensitive to handset market trends and component availability, with the shares showing intraday and weekly movements consistent with sector peers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing automated trading systems from among hundreds of AI trading bots that cover thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent risk-adjusted returns, and robust statistical profiles earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics, allowing users to review detailed statistics including win rates, drawdowns, and ticker-specific suitability before deployment. This curated approach provides market participants with transparent access to data-driven tools suited to varying market regimes. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page to identify configurations that match individual objectives.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Business models present clear contrasts: AMAT generates revenue through sales of capital equipment with high gross margins tied to semiconductor fabrication capacity expansions, whereas QCOM combines product sales with a substantial licensing business that provides more recurring revenue characteristics. Growth drivers differ accordingly, with AMAT positioned to benefit from sustained investment in leading-edge manufacturing capacity and QCOM leveraging wireless technology adoption across multiple end markets. Recent momentum has favored equipment names amid AI infrastructure buildout, while QCOM has faced headwinds from consumer electronics cycles. Risk factors include AMAT’s exposure to trade policy and customer capex variability, contrasted with QCOM’s sensitivity to handset volumes and component costs. Sector exposure places both within technology but with AMAT more directly linked to semiconductor capital spending and QCOM to broader connectivity ecosystems. Market sentiment reflects these dynamics, with equipment stocks often exhibiting sharper reactions to macro and industry news compared with more diversified platform companies.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings visibility, and relative positioning within their respective segments, Tickeron’s AI analysis would assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term behavior to AMAT at present. The company’s alignment with AI-driven fabrication demand and the upcoming earnings release provide a defined catalyst window, while QCOM’s recent results and guidance reflect a more measured outlook amid supply and end-market considerations. This assessment remains probabilistic and subject to shifts in broader market conditions or new data releases.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAT is a Hold and QCOM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMAT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQCOM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AMAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- QCOM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QCOM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- QCOM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
AMAT (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +1.34% price change this week, while QCOM (@Semiconductors) price change was +2.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +6.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.70%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMAT is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
QCOM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (+6.58% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (+1.82% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| AMAT | QCOM | AMAT / QCOM | |
| Capitalization | 424B | 173B | 245% |
| EBITDA | 11.1B | 13.5B | 82% |
| Gain YTD | 108.519 | -2.683 | -4,044% |
| P/E Ratio | 50.29 | 18.83 | 267% |
| Revenue | 29B | 44.1B | 66% |
| Total Cash | 8.24B | 8.3B | 99% |
| Total Debt | 7.27B | 15.3B | 48% |
AMAT | QCOM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 77 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QCOM's Valuation (36) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as AMAT (68) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew similarly to AMAT’s over the last 12 months.
AMAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QCOM (77) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that AMAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
AMAT's SMR Rating (25) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (30) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that AMAT’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
AMAT's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (61) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that AMAT’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
AMAT's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (25) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that AMAT’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
| AMAT | QCOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 64% | 14 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 65% |
Advertisement
QCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCOM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCOM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 100% | +1.05% | ||
| LRCX - QCOM | 80% Closely correlated | +3.34% | ||
| KLAC - QCOM | 78% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| AMKR - QCOM | 76% Closely correlated | +3.89% | ||
| AMAT - QCOM | 74% Closely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| KLIC - QCOM | 74% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||