Investors looking at the energy sector often assume all energy ETFs behave alike, but an ETF comparison between FENY and IEZ quickly reveals two very different risk profiles. FENY provides total U.S. energy sector exposure spanning integrated majors, refiners, midstream operators, and producers, whereas IEZ isolates a single subsector: the companies that supply equipment and services to drillers and offshore operators. Because these funds offer alternative exposure within the same sector, understanding their structural differences is essential for investors assessing sector exposure, relative positioning, and fund performance in the current market environment.
FENY is a passively managed ETF that seeks to track the MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index, a benchmark representing the U.S. energy sector across large-, mid-, and small-capitalization companies. The fund typically holds around 100 to 107 securities and carries a net expense ratio of 0.08%, one of the lowest in its category.
Its portfolio is anchored by the integrated supermajors. Exxon Mobil (XOM) and Chevron (CVX) together account for roughly one-third of assets, followed by ConocoPhillips (COP), Marathon Petroleum (MPC), Valero Energy (VLO), Phillips 66 (PSX), Williams Companies (WMB), EOG Resources (EOG), SLB (SLB), and Kinder Morgan (KMI).
This mix spans exploration and production, refining and marketing, and fee-based midstream pipelines, creating a relatively diversified internal structure. The fund is non-diversified and uses a market-capitalization-weighted rebalancing approach, meaning the largest integrated companies exert significant influence over performance.
IEZ is a passively managed ETF that seeks to track the Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Equipment & Services Index, a benchmark composed of U.S. companies that supply equipment or services to oil fields and offshore platforms. The fund typically holds roughly 30 to 36 stocks and carries a net expense ratio of 0.37%.
Concentration is the defining feature. SLB (SLB) and Baker Hughes (BKR) each represent roughly 22% of assets, together exceeding 40% of the portfolio. The next tier includes Halliburton (HAL), TechnipFMC (FTI), and NOV Inc. (NOV), followed by offshore drillers such as Transocean (RIG), Noble Corporation (NE), and Valaris (VAL), plus service providers like Weatherford, Archrock, and Kodiak Gas Services.
Because every holding sits within one narrow subsector, IEZ offers no meaningful cross-subsector diversification. It is also non-diversified and market-cap-weighted, leaving returns highly dependent on a handful of large-cap service names and the broader drilling cycle.
Both ETFs operate within the energy sector but respond to different catalysts. FENY's integrated majors and refiners benefit from global crude and refined-product pricing, refining margins, and steady midstream cash flows, which tend to provide more stable earnings through the cycle. IEZ, by contrast, is a direct bet on upstream capital expenditure: when producers increase drilling budgets, offshore rig utilization, or well completions, service and equipment providers see higher revenue.
Recent market cycles have featured elevated energy prices, disciplined producer capital allocation, and renewed interest in natural gas and liquefied natural gas (LNG) infrastructure, which supports midstream-heavy portions of FENY. Oilfield services have also benefited from offshore and international upstream investment, though the segment remains highly sensitive to commodity-price volatility, geopolitical supply disruptions, and shifts in rig demand. Rising interest rates and global economic-growth expectations remain key macro variables affecting both funds' sector exposure.
Over recent weeks and recent market cycles, the two funds have exhibited meaningfully different return profiles. FENY's blend of integrated majors, refiners, and midstream names has historically delivered steadier performance with lower volatility, supported by diversified cash flows and, in the case of midstream holdings, fee-based revenue.
IEZ has shown greater sensitivity to crude-oil moves and drilling activity. Because its top holdings are service and equipment providers tied to upstream spending, IEZ can outperform sharply during cyclical upswings in exploration activity but can also underperform when producers cut capital budgets. Its concentration amplifies this effect: a single large holding can drive a disproportionate share of relative positioning and fund performance.
In risk-adjusted terms, FENY's broader diversification and lower fee generally support more consistent returns, while IEZ offers higher-beta (more market-sensitive) exposure suited to investors with a specific view on oilfield services momentum. The choice is less about which fund is "better" and more about which subsector exposure an investor intends to capture.
Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool designed to help traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. For investors evaluating sector exposure and relative positioning across energy funds, the AI Screener offers a structured way to surface candidates aligned with specific strategies.
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor FENY for most long-term investors. Its meaningfully lower expense ratio, broader diversification across integrated, refining, midstream, and production subsectors, and more consistent risk profile provide stronger structural resilience. FENY's exposure to fee-based midstream cash flows further supports steadier performance across market cycles.
IEZ remains a compelling tactical vehicle when sector momentum and upstream capital-spending trends favor oilfield services, but its high concentration and elevated volatility make it a less reliable core holding. The AI would therefore view IEZ as a higher-beta complement rather than a substitute for diversified energy exposure, with FENY the more probable choice for broad-based, cost-efficient positioning.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is expected that a price bounce should occur soon.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +2.26% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FENY advanced for three days, in 348 of 385 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
FENY may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 312 of 346 cases where FENY Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 02, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on FENY as a result. In 75 of 85 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for FENY turned negative on November 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 53 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 47 of the 53 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 89%.
FENY moved below its 50-day moving average on November 04, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FENY declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.
The RSI Oscillator for IEZ moved out of oversold territory on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 26 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 25 of the 26 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +3.26% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where IEZ advanced for three days, in 292 of 320 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
IEZ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 03, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on IEZ as a result. In 73 of 81 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for IEZ turned negative on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 45 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 42 of the 45 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 90%.
IEZ moved below its 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 50-day moving average for IEZ moved below the 200-day moving average on October 28, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where IEZ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
The Aroon Indicator for IEZ entered a downward trend on October 26, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
| FENY | IEZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 14 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEZ has been closely correlated with NOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IEZ jumps, then NOV could also see price increases.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BITS | 52.46 | 0.91 | +1.77% |
| Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) | |||
| EIC | 8.64 | -0.06 | -0.69% |
| Eagle Point Income Company | |||
| DFSI | 44.84 | -0.34 | -0.75% |
| Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) | |||
| XLPX | 29.45 | -0.84 | -2.78% |
| Corgi U.S. Consumer Staples 2x Daily ETF (XLPX) | |||
| GXRP | 22.64 | -1.17 | -4.91% |
| Grayscale XRP Trust ETF (GXRP) | |||