FER
Price
$64.15
Change
-$0.36 (-0.56%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
46.7B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IESC
Price
$755.98
Change
+$7.54 (+1.01%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.9B
117 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FER vs IESC

FER vs IESC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ferrovial (FER) vs. IES Holdings (IESC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Ferrovial operates in global infrastructure development and management, while IES Holdings focuses on electrical and mechanical construction services primarily in the United States.
  • Recent market activity shows both stocks responding to sector-specific factors, with Ferrovial influenced by international project pipelines and IES Holdings tied to domestic construction demand.
  • Relative performance in recent weeks reflects differences in geographic exposure and business cyclicality, contributing to distinct volatility patterns.
  • Sector sentiment for infrastructure remains supported by long-term investment trends, whereas construction services face variable short-term demand signals.
  • Risk profiles differ, with Ferrovial exposed to currency and regulatory considerations across multiple countries and IES Holdings more concentrated in U.S. commercial and industrial markets.
  • Market positioning highlights trade-offs between stable, large-scale project visibility at Ferrovial and potentially higher growth sensitivity at IES Holdings.

Introduction

Investors and traders evaluating opportunities in infrastructure and construction-related equities often compare stocks with complementary yet distinct business models. Ferrovial (FER) and IES Holdings (IESC) represent two such names, each operating in adjacent segments of the broader industrials space. This comparison examines their recent performance, operational characteristics, and market positioning to assist those assessing relative value, sector exposure, and momentum within the current environment. The analysis draws on observable trends suitable for both institutional and individual market participants seeking data-driven context.

FER Overview and Recent Performance

Ferrovial, S.A. develops, finances, and operates transportation infrastructure, including toll roads, airports, and construction projects across Europe, North America, and other regions. In recent weeks, the stock has reflected broader market movements in global infrastructure, influenced by project execution updates and macroeconomic factors affecting capital expenditure. Sentiment has been shaped by ongoing developments in major assets and international regulatory environments. Price behavior during recent market activity has shown measured responses to sector news flow rather than sharp single-event reactions, consistent with the company’s diversified geographic footprint.

IESC Overview and Recent Performance

IES Holdings, Inc. provides electrical and mechanical construction, design, and maintenance services to commercial, industrial, and government clients, with primary operations in the United States. Recent performance has aligned with domestic construction and infrastructure spending patterns. In recent weeks, the stock has exhibited sensitivity to order flow, labor market conditions, and input cost trends within the sector. Market activity has been driven by project backlog visibility and regional economic indicators, resulting in price movements that track broader industrials sentiment with a focus on U.S.-centric catalysts.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a curated selection of AI trading bots designed to navigate thousands of tickers across varied market conditions. While hundreds of bots are available, each employing distinct strategies, timeframes, risk parameters, and performance statistics, only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing trends earn placement in the Trending AI Robots section. Available bots cover a wide range of metrics, including win rates, drawdown profiles, and trade frequency, allowing users to review and select from options suited to different objectives. For additional details on current selections, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Ferrovial’s business model centers on long-duration infrastructure concessions and large-scale projects, providing greater visibility into future revenue streams compared with IES Holdings’ more project-based construction services. Growth drivers for Ferrovial include global transportation trends and public-private partnerships, while IES Holdings benefits from U.S. commercial and industrial expansion. Recent momentum has differed due to geographic diversification at Ferrovial versus concentrated domestic exposure at IES Holdings. Risk factors for Ferrovial encompass currency fluctuations and multi-jurisdictional regulations, whereas IES Holdings faces cyclical demand tied to construction activity and labor availability. Sector sentiment remains constructive for both, yet trade-offs emerge in stability versus potential sensitivity to short-term economic indicators.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, sector positioning, and relative stability in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference toward Ferrovial (FER) for its broader diversification and project pipeline visibility, though outcomes remain contingent on evolving macroeconomic and sector-specific developments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FER vs. IESC commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FER is a Buy and IESC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (FER: $64.51 vs. IESC: $748.44)
Brand notoriety: FER and IESC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FER: 58% vs. IESC: 28%
Market capitalization -- FER: $46.7B vs. IESC: $14.9B
FER [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $46.7B. IESC’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $14.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $8.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FER’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIESC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FER’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IESC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IESC is a better buy in the long-term than FER.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FER’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IESC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FER’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • IESC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IESC is a better buy in the short-term than FER.

Price Growth

FER (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -1.35% price change this week, while IESC (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -2.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

FER is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

IESC is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-2.58% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FER($46.7B) has a higher market cap than IESC($14.9B). FER has higher P/E ratio than IESC: FER (67.33) vs IESC (33.22). IESC YTD gains are higher at: 92.391 vs. FER (-0.155). FER has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.09B vs. IESC (639M). FER has more cash in the bank: 3.86B vs. IESC (388M). IESC has less debt than FER: IESC (76.9M) vs FER (10.7B). FER has higher revenues than IESC: FER (9.86B) vs IESC (3.99B).
FERIESCFER / IESC
Capitalization46.7B14.9B313%
EBITDA2.09B639M327%
Gain YTD-0.15592.391-0%
P/E Ratio67.3333.22203%
Revenue9.86B3.99B247%
Total Cash3.86B388M996%
Total Debt10.7B76.9M13,914%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IESC: Fundamental Ratings
IESC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
81
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15
SMR RATING
1..100
23
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FERIESC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FER
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IESC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KELYB23.671.77
+8.08%
Kelly Services
AZI1.320.05
+3.94%
Autozi Internet Technology (Global) Ltd
CLH320.243.59
+1.13%
Clean Harbors
SDRL47.010.29
+0.62%
Seadrill Limited
ATRA8.51-0.72
-7.75%
Atara Biotherapeutics Inc.

IESC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESC has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IESC jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IESC
1D Price
Change %
IESC100%
-2.33%
FIX - IESC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
MTZ - IESC
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
STRL - IESC
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
MYRG - IESC
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
ECG - IESC
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
More