Comfort Systems USA (FIX) and IES Holdings (IESC) operate in the mechanical and electrical contracting space, benefiting from booming demand for data centers, industrial facilities, and infrastructure. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, growth drivers, and market positioning in the current environment of heightened construction activity. Traders seeking momentum plays and investors eyeing construction sector exposure will find value in understanding their relative strengths, particularly amid AI-driven infrastructure builds and sector tailwinds.
Comfort Systems USA (FIX), headquartered in Houston, Texas, provides mechanical and electrical installation, renovation, maintenance, and replacement services across HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning), plumbing, piping, controls, off-site construction, monitoring, and fire protection. Operating through Mechanical and Electrical segments, it serves commercial, industrial, and institutional markets.
In recent market activity, FIX stock has delivered exceptional gains, with YTD returns near 111% and 1-year returns over 350%, far exceeding the S&P 500. Q1 2026 earnings showcased revenue of $2.87 billion, up 57% year-over-year and beating estimates by 18%, driven by 51% organic growth. EPS rose 121% to $10.51, surpassing forecasts by 46%. Backlog reached a record $12.45 billion, up from $6.89 billion prior year, fueled by data center and technology projects. Sentiment remains bullish on modular capacity expansions and strong cash flows, though elevated valuations reflect rapid appreciation.
IES Holdings (IESC), based in Sugar Land, Texas, designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems, offering infrastructure products across Communications, Residential, Infrastructure Solutions, and Commercial & Industrial segments. Services include data center infrastructure, residential electrical/HVAC/plumbing, motor repairs, and electrical design for offices, manufacturing, and renewables.
Recent weeks have seen IESC advance with YTD returns of 70% and 1-year gains over 175%. Fiscal Q2 2026 results featured revenue of $974 million, up 17% year-over-year, with adjusted EPS of $4.16 beating estimates. Net income climbed 56% to $110 million, supported by margin expansion in Communications and Infrastructure. Backlog growth and the Gulf Island Fabrication acquisition enhanced industrial capabilities. While shares dipped post-earnings on a revenue miss versus expectations, overall momentum persists from data center and multi-family housing demand.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from its library of hundreds that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only 25+ bots, selected from 351 total, earn a spot based on real-time AI analysis of metrics like annualized returns (up to +169%), win rates (51-88%), and profit factors (1.5-11.7). These include Signal Agents for real-time alerts, Virtual Agents with customizable risk controls, and Brokerage Agents, spanning trend-following, multi-ticker strategies in semiconductors, industrials (notably including FIX in construction plays at +93% annualized), data centers, volatility, and leveraged ETFs. Timeframes range from 5-minute to 48-day holds. Explore these bots to align with your trading style and current market conditions.
Both FIX and IESC thrive in electrical/mechanical services, with heavy data center exposure driving growth amid AI infrastructure booms. FIX's Mechanical/Electrical model emphasizes HVAC and modular construction for broader commercial/industrial use, while IESC's diversified segments add residential solar, motor repairs, and communications infrastructure.
FIX leads in scale ($69B market cap vs. $13B), revenue ($10B TTM), and momentum (YTD 111% vs. 70%), with superior organic growth. IESC counters with lower P/E (33 vs. 57), lower debt, and acquisitions like Gulf Island bolstering energy/industrial plays. Risks include labor shortages and project delays for both; FIX faces valuation stretch, IESC revenue volatility. Sentiment favors FIX on backlog visibility, but IESC offers relative value in infrastructure.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors FIX due to its trend consistency, record backlog, explosive earnings growth, and positioning in high-demand data center modular work. With stronger relative performance and organic expansion, FIX shows higher probability of near-term outperformance versus IESC, though both benefit from sector catalysts.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIX’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIESC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIX’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IESC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
FIX (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +2.11% price change this week, while IESC (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +2.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.60%.
FIX is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
IESC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| FIX | IESC | FIX / IESC | |
| Capitalization | 70.1B | 13.6B | 515% |
| EBITDA | 1.72B | 537M | 321% |
| Gain YTD | 113.712 | 75.364 | 151% |
| P/E Ratio | 57.53 | 36.38 | 158% |
| Revenue | 10.1B | 3.63B | 278% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 263M | - |
| Total Debt | 339M | 107M | 317% |
FIX | IESC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 39 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IESC's Valuation (83) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FIX (87). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to FIX’s over the last 12 months.
FIX's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (6). This means that FIX’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
FIX's SMR Rating (19) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (22). This means that FIX’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
FIX's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (36). This means that FIX’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
FIX's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (14). This means that FIX’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
| FIX | IESC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 19 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NBSD | 50.73 | -0.06 | -0.12% |
| Neuberger Short Duration Income ETF | |||
| SDCI | 28.87 | -0.06 | -0.21% |
| USCF SummerHaven Dyn CmdtyStgy NoK-1 ETF | |||
| XHYE | 39.10 | -0.09 | -0.22% |
| BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sctr ETF | |||
| NIM | 9.17 | -0.15 | -1.57% |
| Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund | |||
| VPU | 190.20 | -4.36 | -2.24% |
| Vanguard Utilities ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIX has been closely correlated with EME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FIX jumps, then EME could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIX | 100% | -2.39% | ||
| EME - FIX | 79% Closely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| PWR - FIX | 75% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| MTZ - FIX | 73% Closely correlated | -4.57% | ||
| IESC - FIX | 73% Closely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| MYRG - FIX | 68% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESC has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IESC jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IESC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IESC | 100% | -2.15% | ||
| FIX - IESC | 73% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| PWR - IESC | 67% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| EME - IESC | 67% Closely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| MTZ - IESC | 65% Loosely correlated | -4.57% | ||
| STRL - IESC | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.52% | ||
More | ||||