FHN
Price
$24.63
Change
-$0.05 (-0.20%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
11.67B
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HBANM
Price
$20.30
Change
-$0.10 (-0.49%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHN vs HBANM

FHN vs HBANM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHN vs. HBANM commentary
Aug 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHN is a Hold and HBANM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 24, 2026
Stock price -- (FHN: $24.63 vs. HBANM: $20.30)
Brand notoriety: FHN and HBANM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHN: 77% vs. HBANM: 67%
Market capitalization -- FHN: $11.67B vs. HBANM: $0
FHN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.67B. HBANM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHBANM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FHN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HBANM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHN is a better buy in the long-term than HBANM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBANM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HBANM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHN is a better buy in the short-term than HBANM.

Price Growth

FHN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.06% price change this week, while HBANM (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

FHN is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHN YTD gains are higher at: 4.562 vs. HBANM (-3.491). HBANM has more cash in the bank: 3.33B vs. FHN (889M). FHN has less debt than HBANM: FHN (3.29B) vs HBANM (21.8B). HBANM has higher revenues than FHN: HBANM (9.68B) vs FHN (3.37B).
FHNHBANMFHN / HBANM
Capitalization11.7BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.562-3.491-131%
P/E Ratio11.84N/A-
Revenue3.37B9.68B35%
Total Cash889M3.33B27%
Total Debt3.29B21.8B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHN: Fundamental Ratings
FHN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
66
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHNHBANM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HBANM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OMEX0.920.04
+5.08%
Odyssey Marine Exploration
GRC78.090.24
+0.31%
Gorman-Rupp Company (The)
RDAG10.400.02
+0.19%
Republic Digital Acquisition Company
MBINL25.00-0.01
-0.04%
Merchants Bancorp
DAR65.74-2.10
-3.10%
Darling Ingredients

FHN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHN has been closely correlated with HWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHN jumps, then HWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHN
1D Price
Change %
FHN100%
-0.20%
HWC - FHN
81%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
KEY - FHN
81%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
WTFC - FHN
81%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
FNB - FHN
79%
Closely correlated
N/A
ASB - FHN
78%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
More

HBANM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBANM has been loosely correlated with FHN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBANM jumps, then FHN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBANM
1D Price
Change %
HBANM100%
-0.49%
FHN - HBANM
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
ZION - HBANM
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
HBAN - HBANM
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
BOH - HBANM
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
KEY - HBANM
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
More