FHN
Price
$25.62
Change
-$0.02 (-0.08%)
Updated
Aug 3, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.17B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HBANM
Price
$20.81
Change
-$0.06 (-0.29%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHN vs HBANM

FHN vs HBANM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHN vs. HBANM commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHN is a StrongBuy and HBANM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FHN: $25.64 vs. HBANM: $20.81)
Brand notoriety: FHN and HBANM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHN: 141% vs. HBANM: 105%
Market capitalization -- FHN: $12.17B vs. HBANM: $0
FHN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.17B. HBANM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHBANM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FHN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HBANM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHN is a better buy in the long-term than HBANM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBANM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HBANM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBANM is a better buy in the short-term than FHN.

Price Growth

FHN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.43% price change this week, while HBANM (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

FHN is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.90% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHN YTD gains are higher at: 8.850 vs. HBANM (-2.741). HBANM has more cash in the bank: 2.1B vs. FHN (889M). FHN has less debt than HBANM: FHN (3.29B) vs HBANM (21.8B). HBANM has higher revenues than FHN: HBANM (9.68B) vs FHN (3.37B).
FHNHBANMFHN / HBANM
Capitalization12.2BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.850-2.741-323%
P/E Ratio12.88N/A-
Revenue3.37B9.68B35%
Total Cash889M2.1B42%
Total Debt3.29B21.8B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHN: Fundamental Ratings
FHN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
93
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHNHBANM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
35%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HBANM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGL0.990.04
+4.07%
Founder Group Limited
APA37.320.99
+2.73%
APA Corp
MATV8.730.17
+1.99%
Mativ Holdings
NG5.83-0.24
-3.95%
NovaGold Resources
GANX1.68-0.08
-4.55%
Gain Therapeutics

HBANM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBANM has been loosely correlated with FHN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBANM jumps, then FHN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBANM
1D Price
Change %
HBANM100%
-0.29%
FHN - HBANM
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
ZION - HBANM
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
HBAN - HBANM
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
BOH - HBANM
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
KEY - HBANM
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
More