Advertisement
FIZZ vs GOGO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIZZ is a Hold and GOGO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIZZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGOGO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FIZZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GOGO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIZZ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GOGO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FIZZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GOGO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FIZZ (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -5.58% price change this week, while GOGO (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +17.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.81%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
FIZZ is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.
GOGO is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+0.51% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Wireless Telecommunications (-0.19% weekly)Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
| FIZZ | GOGO | FIZZ / GOGO | |
| Capitalization | 4.63B | 1.08B | 430% |
| EBITDA | 248M | 172M | 144% |
| Gain YTD | 1.664 | 74.042 | 2% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.31 | 7.71 | 354% |
| Revenue | 1.18B | 398M | 297% |
| Total Cash | 277M | 139M | 199% |
| Total Debt | 58.2M | 678M | 9% |
FIZZ | GOGO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GOGO's Valuation (89) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as FIZZ (93) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that GOGO’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
GOGO's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as FIZZ (65) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that GOGO’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
FIZZ's SMR Rating (23) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for GOGO (92) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that FIZZ’s stock grew significantly faster than GOGO’s over the last 12 months.
GOGO's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as FIZZ (59) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that GOGO’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
GOGO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for FIZZ (76) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that GOGO’s stock grew significantly faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
| FIZZ | GOGO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 71% | 8 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 62% | 25 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
FIZZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIZZ has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIZZ jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIZZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIZZ | 100% | +2.53% | ||
| PEP - FIZZ | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| MNST - FIZZ | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
| KO - FIZZ | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.31% | ||
| KDP - FIZZ | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.95% | ||
| CELH - FIZZ | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.25% | ||
More | ||||
GOGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOGO has been loosely correlated with IRDM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GOGO jumps, then IRDM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GOGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOGO | 100% | -0.49% | ||
| IRDM - GOGO | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.71% | ||
| CHT - GOGO | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| KKPNY - GOGO | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
| SHEN - GOGO | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
| AMX - GOGO | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
More | ||||