FLEX
Price
$75.01
Change
+$1.82 (+2.49%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
27.59B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FN
Price
$618.26
Change
+$8.08 (+1.32%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
22.15B
31 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLEX vs FN

Header iconFLEX vs FN Comparison
Open Charts FLEX vs FNBanner chart's image
FLEX vs FN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Flex Ltd. (FLEX) vs. Fabrinet (FN) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both FLEX and FN benefit from AI-driven demand in data centers and electronics manufacturing, with strong year-to-date gains of approximately 22% and 36%, respectively.
  • FLEX reported Q3 fiscal 2026 revenue of $7.1 billion, up 8% year-over-year, fueled by cloud and power segments, while raising full-year guidance.
  • FN delivered Q2 fiscal 2026 revenue of $1.13 billion, surging 36% year-over-year, driven by optical communications and high-performance computing (HPC).
  • Recent momentum shows FN outperforming with over 240% one-year returns versus FLEX's 165%, amid partnerships in silicon photonics.
  • FLEX offers broader diversification across automotive and health solutions, while FN specializes in precision optics for AI infrastructure.
  • Tickeron's AI robots highlight sector-tailored strategies, with top performers showing 70-80% win rates in technology and semiconductors.

Introduction

Flex Ltd. (FLEX) and Fabrinet (FN) operate in the electronics manufacturing services sector, capitalizing on surging demand for AI data centers, optical components, and high-performance computing. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and market positioning in the current environment of technology transitions and supply chain optimization. Traders seeking momentum plays and investors eyeing long-term growth in semiconductors and cloud infrastructure will find value in understanding their relative strengths, such as revenue trajectories and sector exposures, amid broader market rotations.

FLEX Overview and Recent Performance

Flex Ltd. (FLEX) is a global leader in electronics manufacturing services (EMS), providing end-to-end solutions including design, supply chain management, and production for data centers, communications, automotive, and health sectors. Operating through Flex Agility Solutions (FAS) and Flex Reliability Solutions (FRS), it supports diverse end markets like cloud infrastructure and medical devices.

In recent market activity, FLEX shares have shown robust momentum, rising over 20% year-to-date and hitting new 52-week highs near $73, outperforming the S&P 500. This follows Q3 fiscal 2026 results with $7.1 billion in revenue, up 8% year-over-year, and adjusted EPS of $0.87, beating estimates amid AI-driven data center demand. The company raised full-year revenue guidance to $27.2-$27.5 billion, bolstered by acquisitions like Electrical Power Products for $1.1 billion to enhance power infrastructure. Sentiment has shifted positively on strong cash flow and AI catalysts, though tariff pressures and competition remain factors.

FN Overview and Recent Performance

Fabrinet (FN) specializes in advanced optical packaging and precision manufacturing of electro-mechanical and electronic components for original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). It serves optical communications, automotive, industrial lasers, and medical sectors, with expertise in transceivers, modulators, and high-performance computing modules.

Recent weeks have seen FN shares surge, up 36% year-to-date and over 240% in the past year, reaching highs near $633 before recent volatility. Q2 fiscal 2026 revenue hit a record $1.13 billion, up 36% year-over-year, with non-GAAP EPS of $3.36 exceeding forecasts, propelled by 29% growth in optical communications and $86 million from HPC. Expansions like the iPronics silicon photonics partnership have boosted sentiment, alongside guidance for Q3 revenue of $1.15-$1.20 billion. Customer concentration and capacity constraints pose risks, but AI infrastructure tailwinds drive performance.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. These bots employ deep learning, price action analysis, and risk controls, with trending ones delivering standout results like 30-day annualized returns up to 171%, win rates of 70-95%, and profit factors exceeding 3.0 in sectors such as technology, semiconductors, and industrials. For instance, bots focusing on momentum and sector rotation have achieved 73-100% success rates over recent periods. This selective section highlights bots best suited to current volatility and growth themes. Explore these tools to align automated strategies with your trading style.

Head-to-Head Comparison

FLEX and FN both thrive in electronics manufacturing but differ in scale and focus. FLEX's diversified model spans FAS for high-velocity consumer and cloud products and FRS for reliable automotive and health solutions, generating broader revenue from global supply chains. In contrast, FN excels in niche precision optics for datacom and HPC, offering higher growth potential but narrower exposure.

Recent momentum favors FN with superior one-year returns, tied to optical AI catalysts, while FLEX provides stability through acquisitions and raised guidance. Risk factors include FN's customer concentration versus FLEX's tariff sensitivity. Sector-wise, both leverage AI infrastructure, but FN has stronger datacom tilt and FLEX more automotive balance. Market sentiment reflects FN's premium valuation at 53x earnings versus FLEX's relative value.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors FN for its superior trend consistency in AI optical demand, explosive revenue growth, and HPC catalysts, positioning it ahead in relative performance. However, FLEX appeals for stability and diversification. Probabilistic edge tilts to FN amid ongoing data center expansions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
FLEX vs. FN commentary
Apr 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLEX is a StrongBuy and FN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2026
Stock price -- (FLEX: $75.03 vs. FN: $618.26)
Brand notoriety: FLEX and FN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLEX: 114% vs. FN: 133%
Market capitalization -- FLEX: $27.59B vs. FN: $22.15B
FLEX [@Electronic Components] is valued at $27.59B. FN’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $22.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $169.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $10.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLEX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLEX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLEX is a better buy in the long-term than FN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLEX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLEX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLEX is a better buy in the short-term than FN.

Price Growth

FLEX (@Electronic Components) experienced а +9.39% price change this week, while FN (@Electronic Components) price change was +10.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +5.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLEX is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2026.

FN is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+5.83% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLEX($27.6B) has a higher market cap than FN($22.1B). FN has higher P/E ratio than FLEX: FN (59.28) vs FLEX (33.65). FN YTD gains are higher at: 35.798 vs. FLEX (24.181). FLEX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.89B vs. FN (466M). FLEX has more cash in the bank: 3.06B vs. FN (961M). FN has less debt than FLEX: FN (4.89M) vs FLEX (5.02B). FLEX has higher revenues than FN: FLEX (26.8B) vs FN (3.89B).
FLEXFNFLEX / FN
Capitalization27.6B22.1B125%
EBITDA1.89B466M406%
Gain YTD24.18135.79868%
P/E Ratio33.6559.2857%
Revenue26.8B3.89B688%
Total Cash3.06B961M318%
Total Debt5.02B4.89M102,723%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLEX vs FN: Fundamental Ratings
FLEX
FN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2930
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85
SMR RATING
1..100
5046
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3736
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLEX's Valuation (56) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (73). This means that FLEX’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FLEX (8). This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to FLEX’s over the last 12 months.

FN's SMR Rating (46) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FLEX (50). This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to FLEX’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FLEX (37). This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to FLEX’s over the last 12 months.

FN's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FLEX (8). This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to FLEX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLEXFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLEX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XVOL23.230.71
+3.17%
Acruence Active Hedge US Equity ETF
HTAX24.530.08
+0.32%
Macquarie National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF
IBID26.070.02
+0.08%
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term Tips ETF
STPZ54.170.04
+0.07%
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF
XOP167.76-3.93
-2.29%
SttStrtSPDRS&POil&GasExplor&ProdtnETF

FLEX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLEX has been closely correlated with JBL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLEX jumps, then JBL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLEX
1D Price
Change %
FLEX100%
+2.51%
JBL - FLEX
83%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
CLS - FLEX
74%
Closely correlated
+2.38%
PLXS - FLEX
74%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
BHE - FLEX
73%
Closely correlated
+2.78%
FN - FLEX
72%
Closely correlated
+1.32%
More

FN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FN has been closely correlated with FLEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FN jumps, then FLEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FN
1D Price
Change %
FN100%
+1.32%
FLEX - FN
72%
Closely correlated
+2.51%
CLS - FN
72%
Closely correlated
+2.38%
JBL - FN
71%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
GLW - FN
71%
Closely correlated
+2.85%
TTMI - FN
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
More