Advertisement
MARPS vs PAGP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MARPS is a Hold and PAGP is a Hold.
MARPS | PAGP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MARPS's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as PAGP (12) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew similarly to PAGP’s over the last 12 months.
PAGP's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is significantly better than the same rating for MARPS (86) in the null industry. This means that PAGP’s stock grew significantly faster than MARPS’s over the last 12 months.
MARPS's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as PAGP (27) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew similarly to PAGP’s over the last 12 months.
PAGP's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as MARPS (71) in the null industry. This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to MARPS’s over the last 12 months.
PAGP's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as MARPS (32) in the null industry. This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to MARPS’s over the last 12 months.
| MARPS | PAGP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 72% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 49% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MARPS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while PAGP’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
- MARPS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- PAGP’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MARPS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAGP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MARPS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
- PAGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
MARPS (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -2.56% price change this week, while PAGP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -1.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
PAGP is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.30% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ACTS | 26.08 | 0.65 | +2.57% |
| FIS Tactical Equity ETF (ACTS) | |||
| EWX | 71.34 | 0.69 | +0.97% |
| State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EWX) | |||
| DFSV | 38.17 | 0.29 | +0.77% |
| Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV) | |||
| NDAA | 24.05 | 0.14 | +0.59% |
| Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF (NDAA) | |||
| CNAV | 41.97 | 0.19 | +0.46% |
| Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) | |||
MARPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MARPS has been loosely correlated with TMDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MARPS jumps, then TMDE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MARPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARPS | 100% | N/A | ||
| TMDE - MARPS | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| DTM - MARPS | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
| PAGP - MARPS | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
| PBT - MARPS | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
| FLNG - MARPS | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
More | ||||
PAGP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGP has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGP jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAGP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAGP | 100% | +0.50% | ||
| PAA - PAGP | 96% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| EPD - PAGP | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| OKE - PAGP | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| TRGP - PAGP | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| WES - PAGP | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
More | ||||