FRO
Price
$42.51
Change
+$0.93 (+2.24%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:07 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.26B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NAT
Price
$6.39
Change
+$0.18 (+2.90%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:13 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.31B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRO vs NAT

FRO vs NAT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Frontline plc (FRO) vs. Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Frontline plc (FRO) and Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) are both Bermuda-based tanker shipping companies exposed to global crude oil transportation demand.
  • Recent market activity shows both stocks benefiting from elevated tanker rates amid geopolitical disruptions in key shipping routes.
  • FRO reported robust first-quarter 2026 results with strong adjusted profits and a substantial dividend declaration, while NAT’s first-quarter earnings are scheduled for late May 2026.
  • Year-to-date returns through late May 2026 place FRO ahead of NAT on a percentage basis, though both significantly outperformed the broader market.
  • FRO operates a larger fleet with greater scale in very large crude carrier (VLCC) and Suezmax segments compared to NAT’s smaller, more focused fleet.
  • Market sentiment remains tied to spot freight rates, charter coverage, and ongoing Red Sea and Middle East shipping volatility affecting both companies.

Introduction

Frontline plc (FRO) and Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) represent two prominent players in the tanker shipping sector, where fleet utilization, freight rates, and geopolitical factors drive performance. Investors and traders focused on energy transportation, cyclical shipping equities, or dividend-oriented strategies often compare these names to assess relative exposure to crude oil logistics. The comparison highlights differences in scale, recent financial momentum, and positioning within a market environment shaped by supply disruptions and demand fluctuations.

FRO Overview and Recent Performance

Frontline plc (FRO) owns and operates a fleet of crude oil tankers, primarily VLCCs and Suezmax vessels, serving major oil producers and traders worldwide. In recent weeks, the stock has reflected strength from elevated spot earnings, with VLCC rates reported above $100,000 per day amid ongoing Middle East disruptions. The company delivered first-quarter 2026 results showing a profit of $559 million and adjusted profit of $345 million, accompanied by a $1.55 per share dividend. Year-to-date returns reached approximately 76 percent through late May 2026, supported by high charter bookings into the second quarter and operational leverage to freight rate volatility.

NAT Overview and Recent Performance

Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) focuses on owning and chartering a fleet of Suezmax tankers, emphasizing long-term contracts alongside spot market exposure. Recent market activity has been influenced by new charter agreements and anticipation of first-quarter 2026 earnings, scheduled for late May. Year-to-date returns stood near 62 percent through late May 2026, with the stock trading around $5.40 amid broader sector gains from disrupted shipping lanes. Management has highlighted solid contract coverage and expectations for improved sequential performance, though the company maintains a smaller operational footprint relative to larger peers.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent risk-adjusted returns, and relevant trading styles earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, enabling users to identify automated approaches suited to specific equities or sectors. The platform provides transparent metrics on win rates, drawdowns, and trade frequency to support informed evaluation. Review the Trending AI Robots page for current selections and detailed bot profiles.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Frontline plc (FRO) maintains a larger fleet and greater revenue scale than Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT), resulting in higher absolute earnings potential during periods of elevated tanker rates. NAT emphasizes a more concentrated Suezmax portfolio with notable charter coverage, which can provide relative stability but limits upside capture compared to FRO’s broader VLCC exposure. Recent momentum favors FRO following its strong first-quarter results and dividend announcement, while NAT’s performance has been steadier ahead of its earnings release. Both companies face similar risk factors, including freight rate cyclicality, fuel costs, and geopolitical route disruptions, though FRO’s size may amplify sensitivity to rate swings. Sector sentiment remains constructive for tanker equities overall, with market positioning differentiated by fleet modernization, balance sheet flexibility, and dividend sustainability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent earnings delivery, charter visibility, and relative scale within the tanker sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to Frontline plc (FRO) over Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). FRO’s demonstrated ability to capitalize on spot market strength and deliver robust adjusted results provides a clearer near-term catalyst profile. NAT’s positioning remains competitive but appears more dependent on upcoming earnings confirmation and sustained contract execution. This assessment reflects relative data patterns rather than absolute superiority.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FRO vs. NAT commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRO is a Buy and NAT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (FRO: $41.58 vs. NAT: $6.21)
Brand notoriety: FRO: Not notable vs. NAT: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRO: 165% vs. NAT: 232%
Market capitalization -- FRO: $9.26B vs. NAT: $1.31B
FRO [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $9.26B. NAT’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $1.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $119.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $16.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNAT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FRO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NAT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRO is a better buy in the long-term than NAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRO is a better buy in the short-term than NAT.

Price Growth

FRO (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +5.45% price change this week, while NAT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +14.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRO is expected to report earnings on Aug 31, 2026.

NAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 31, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.60% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRO($9.26B) has a higher market cap than NAT($1.32B). NAT has higher P/E ratio than FRO: NAT (24.01) vs FRO (10.24). FRO YTD gains are higher at: 105.169 vs. NAT (94.174). FRO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.12B vs. NAT (90.6M). NAT has less debt than FRO: NAT (424M) vs FRO (2.63B). FRO has higher revenues than NAT: FRO (2.25B) vs NAT (331M).
FRONATFRO / NAT
Capitalization9.26B1.32B704%
EBITDA1.12B90.6M1,234%
Gain YTD105.16994.174112%
P/E Ratio10.2424.0143%
Revenue2.25B331M680%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.63B424M621%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRO vs NAT: Fundamental Ratings
FRO
NAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1924
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1318
SMR RATING
1..100
2767
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3738
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6521
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRO's Valuation (4) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as NAT (7). This means that FRO’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.

FRO's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as NAT (18). This means that FRO’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.

FRO's SMR Rating (27) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NAT (67). This means that FRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than NAT’s over the last 12 months.

FRO's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as NAT (38). This means that FRO’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.

NAT's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRO (65). This means that NAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRONAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGFCX42.84N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes International Leaders C
CMNWX90.16N/A
N/A
Principal Capital Appreciation A
SCCVX16.12N/A
N/A
AB Small Cap Value C
ADNRX22.48N/A
N/A
American Beacon ARK Transfmt Innov R6
RGABX76.30-0.41
-0.53%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2

FRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRO has been closely correlated with DHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRO jumps, then DHT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRO
1D Price
Change %
FRO100%
+1.59%
DHT - FRO
86%
Closely correlated
+4.66%
TNK - FRO
82%
Closely correlated
+4.20%
INSW - FRO
82%
Closely correlated
+4.64%
TEN - FRO
80%
Closely correlated
+3.73%
TRMD - FRO
75%
Closely correlated
+2.92%
More

NAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAT has been closely correlated with FRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NAT jumps, then FRO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAT
1D Price
Change %
NAT100%
+6.15%
FRO - NAT
75%
Closely correlated
+1.59%
TNK - NAT
75%
Closely correlated
+4.20%
DHT - NAT
74%
Closely correlated
+4.66%
ECO - NAT
73%
Closely correlated
+4.78%
INSW - NAT
72%
Closely correlated
+4.64%
More