NAT
Price
$5.87
Change
-$0.40 (-6.39%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.24B
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TEN
Price
$36.69
Change
-$0.99 (-2.63%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.11B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NAT vs TEN

NAT vs TEN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) vs. Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • NAT and TEN are both mid-sized tanker operators exposed to volatile freight rates driven by geopolitical disruptions and extended shipping routes in recent weeks.
  • TEN reported stronger Q1 2026 earnings with net income up 160% year-over-year and raised its annual dividend to $1.50 per share, the highest in over a decade.
  • NAT maintains a higher dividend yield near 8.7% and has delivered substantial year-to-date gains exceeding 60%, though its valuation appears more stretched relative to earnings.
  • Both stocks trade at modest market capitalizations around $1.1–1.3 billion and have benefited from sector tailwinds, yet TEN shows tighter fleet utilization above 98% and a larger contracted revenue backlog exceeding $3.5 billion.
  • Recent market activity reflects heightened volatility for both, with NAT experiencing profit-taking after multi-year highs while TEN hit 52-week peaks following its earnings release.
  • Relative performance favors TEN on earnings momentum and dividend growth, while NAT offers higher yield but greater earnings variability.

Introduction

Investors and traders comparing tanker stocks often focus on companies with similar business models yet differing operational scale and capital-return policies. NAT (Nordic American Tankers Limited) and TEN (Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited) both operate in the crude and product tanker segment, where freight rates remain sensitive to global oil trade flows and geopolitical events. This comparison appeals to those seeking exposure to energy transportation without direct commodity ownership, particularly portfolio managers evaluating dividend sustainability and earnings resilience amid fluctuating charter markets. The analysis highlights observable differences in recent financial results, fleet metrics, and market positioning to support informed relative assessments.

NAT Overview and Recent Performance

Nordic American Tankers Limited operates a fleet of Suezmax tankers focused on spot and short-term charters. In recent weeks, the stock has traded near $5.40 after retreating from April highs above $6.30, reflecting broader sector profit-taking following strong prior gains. Year-to-date performance remains robust with returns exceeding 60%, supported by elevated tanker demand from route disruptions. Company press releases in May 2026 noted new contracts secured in a solid market environment. Sentiment has been influenced by high dividend distributions near 8.7% yield, though earnings variability and a higher price-to-earnings ratio have tempered enthusiasm in recent market activity.

TEN Overview and Recent Performance

Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited manages a diversified fleet of tankers with a mix of long-term charters and spot exposure. The stock recently reached 52-week highs near $45.85 before settling around $42.60 following its Q1 2026 earnings release. Performance has been strong, with year-to-date gains near 90%, driven by record quarterly results including net income of $89 million, up 160% year-over-year, and adjusted EBITDA of $154 million. The board declared a $1.00 semi-annual dividend, bringing the annualized total to $1.50 per share. Fleet utilization reached 98.3% with a substantial contracted backlog exceeding $3.5 billion, contributing to positive sentiment in recent market activity.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available that execute strategies across thousands of tickers. Only the most suitable bots for prevailing market conditions are featured in this section, reflecting diverse trading styles, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker sets. Available bots demonstrate varied win rates, profit factors, and drawdown metrics, often spanning equity, options, and futures markets with backtested and live results. Users can explore these tools to identify automated approaches aligned with their risk parameters and market views. For further details, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both companies operate in the oil transportation sector with exposure to freight-rate cyclicality, yet TEN maintains a larger contracted revenue backlog and higher fleet utilization, providing greater earnings visibility compared with NAT’s more spot-oriented model. Growth drivers favor TEN following its recent profit surge and dividend increase, while NAT offers a higher current yield amid ongoing market volatility. Risk factors include shared sensitivity to oil demand shifts and geopolitical events, though TEN’s lower price-to-earnings ratio suggests relatively attractive valuation. Market sentiment has turned more favorable toward TEN post-earnings, contrasting with NAT’s recent consolidation after extended rallies. Sector exposure remains comparable, centered on mid-sized tanker fleets.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, dividend momentum, and relative valuation stability, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable positioning to TEN. Its stronger Q1 results and expanded backlog provide clearer catalysts relative to NAT’s higher-yield but more variable profile. This assessment reflects probabilistic evaluation of trend persistence and sector dynamics rather than certainty.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
NAT vs. TEN commentary
Jun 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAT is a Hold and TEN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2026
Stock price -- (NAT: $6.26 vs. TEN: $37.68)
Brand notoriety: NAT: Notable vs. TEN: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NAT: 218% vs. TEN: 77%
Market capitalization -- NAT: $1.33B vs. TEN: $1.14B
NAT [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $1.33B. TEN’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $1.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $122.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $16.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NAT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTEN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NAT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TEN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NAT and TEN are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TEN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NAT and TEN are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NAT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +7.01% price change this week, while TEN (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

NAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 31, 2026.

TEN is expected to report earnings on Sep 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-0.93% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAT($1.24B) has a higher market cap than TEN($1.11B). NAT has higher P/E ratio than TEN: NAT (24.01) vs TEN (6.48). NAT YTD gains are higher at: 95.737 vs. TEN (71.173). TEN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 308M vs. NAT (90.6M). NAT has less debt than TEN: NAT (424M) vs TEN (2.14B). TEN has higher revenues than NAT: TEN (855M) vs NAT (331M).
NATTENNAT / TEN
Capitalization1.24B1.11B112%
EBITDA90.6M308M29%
Gain YTD95.73771.173135%
P/E Ratio24.016.48371%
Revenue331M855M39%
Total CashN/A321M-
Total Debt424M2.14B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAT vs TEN: Fundamental Ratings
NAT
TEN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
266
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1722
SMR RATING
1..100
6772
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2116
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NAT's Valuation (7) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TEN (22) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to TEN’s over the last 12 months.

NAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TEN (22) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to TEN’s over the last 12 months.

NAT's SMR Rating (67) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TEN (72) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to TEN’s over the last 12 months.

NAT's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TEN (40) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to TEN’s over the last 12 months.

TEN's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as NAT (21) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that TEN’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NATTEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISCCX33.67N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Intl Small-Mid Co C
CGFFX83.77N/A
N/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F
BIIGX36.37N/A
N/A
Buffalo Growth Institutional
PWJZX39.24N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison International Opps Z
NWFAX29.99-0.09
-0.30%
Nationwide A

NAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAT has been closely correlated with FRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NAT jumps, then FRO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAT
1D Price
Change %
NAT100%
-3.25%
FRO - NAT
75%
Closely correlated
-5.53%
TNK - NAT
75%
Closely correlated
-7.94%
DHT - NAT
74%
Closely correlated
-6.76%
ECO - NAT
73%
Closely correlated
-4.70%
INSW - NAT
73%
Closely correlated
-7.10%
More

TEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEN has been closely correlated with FRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEN jumps, then FRO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TEN
1D Price
Change %
TEN100%
-3.73%
FRO - TEN
81%
Closely correlated
-5.53%
INSW - TEN
81%
Closely correlated
-7.10%
TNK - TEN
78%
Closely correlated
-7.94%
DHT - TEN
75%
Closely correlated
-6.76%
TRMD - TEN
71%
Closely correlated
-3.47%
More