Advertisement
FLNT vs TZOO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLNT is a Hold and TZOO is a StrongBuy.
FLNT | TZOO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 85 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLNT's Valuation (48) in the Miscellaneous industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TZOO (95) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that FLNT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TZOO’s over the last 12 months.
FLNT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as TZOO (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that FLNT’s stock grew similarly to TZOO’s over the last 12 months.
TZOO's SMR Rating (9) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLNT (99) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that TZOO’s stock grew significantly faster than FLNT’s over the last 12 months.
FLNT's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as TZOO (85) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that FLNT’s stock grew similarly to TZOO’s over the last 12 months.
TZOO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLNT (38) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that TZOO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLNT’s over the last 12 months.
| FLNT | TZOO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 7 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 82% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLNT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while TZOO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FLNT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TZOO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLNT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TZOO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLNT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TZOO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FLNT (@Advertising/Marketing Services) experienced а -5.03% price change this week, while TZOO (@Internet Software/Services) price change was +0.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was -3.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.27%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLNT is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
TZOO is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Advertising/Marketing Services (-3.40% weekly)Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.
@Internet Software/Services (+1.11% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AQWA | 18.02 | 0.11 | +0.59% |
| Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) | |||
| BUFP | 33.28 | 0.13 | +0.41% |
| PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) | |||
| ENO | 19.53 | 0.02 | +0.10% |
| Entergy New Orleans LLC | |||
| CERY | 39.91 | -0.04 | -0.10% |
| State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) | |||
| OILU | 53.01 | -0.16 | -0.30% |
| MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. 3x Leveraged ETN (OILU) | |||
FLNT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLNT and NCMI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLNT and NCMI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLNT | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| NCMI - FLNT | 23% Poorly correlated | -4.07% | ||
| XNET - FLNT | 22% Poorly correlated | +4.16% | ||
| CNET - FLNT | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
| HHS - FLNT | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TZOO - FLNT | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.61% | ||
More | ||||
TZOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TZOO has been loosely correlated with QNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TZOO jumps, then QNST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TZOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TZOO | 100% | -2.61% | ||
| QNST - TZOO | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| MGNI - TZOO | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
| ZD - TZOO | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
| UPWK - TZOO | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| DLX - TZOO | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||