FNF
Price
$50.04
Change
+$0.51 (+1.03%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
13.47B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MTG
Price
$28.42
Change
+$0.28 (+1.00%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.01B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNF vs MTG

FNF vs MTG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNF vs. MTG commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNF is a StrongBuy and MTG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (FNF: $50.04 vs. MTG: $28.42)
Brand notoriety: FNF and MTG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNF: 74% vs. MTG: 82%
Market capitalization -- FNF: $13.47B vs. MTG: $6.01B
FNF [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $13.47B. MTG’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $6.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $13.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $4.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MTG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTG is a better buy in the long-term than FNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MTG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNF is a better buy in the short-term than MTG.

Price Growth

FNF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +2.73% price change this week, while MTG (@Specialty Insurance) price change was +0.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNF is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

MTG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-0.18% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNF($13.5B) has a higher market cap than MTG($6.01B). FNF has higher P/E ratio than MTG: FNF (17.81) vs MTG (9.02). MTG YTD gains are higher at: -1.625 vs. FNF (-6.315). MTG has less debt than FNF: MTG (647M) vs FNF (4.77B). FNF has higher revenues than MTG: FNF (14.6B) vs MTG (1.2B).
FNFMTGFNF / MTG
Capitalization13.5B6.01B225%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.315-1.625389%
P/E Ratio17.819.02197%
Revenue14.6B1.2B1,213%
Total CashN/A5.94B-
Total Debt4.77B647M737%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNF vs MTG: Fundamental Ratings
FNF
MTG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2973
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
557
SMR RATING
1..100
8963
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5249
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2544
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNF's Valuation (15) in the Specialty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTG (72). This means that FNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTG’s over the last 12 months.

MTG's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Specialty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNF (55). This means that MTG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNF’s over the last 12 months.

MTG's SMR Rating (63) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as FNF (89). This means that MTG’s stock grew similarly to FNF’s over the last 12 months.

MTG's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as FNF (52). This means that MTG’s stock grew similarly to FNF’s over the last 12 months.

FNF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as MTG (44). This means that FNF’s stock grew similarly to MTG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNFMTG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MTG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLIX27.910.14
+0.50%
Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF
YLDE56.70N/A
N/A
Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Inc ETF
SHRY43.78N/A
N/A
First Trust Bloomberg Shld Yld ETF
ARGT94.48-0.59
-0.62%
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
VWO58.79-1.10
-1.84%
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF

MTG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTG has been closely correlated with NMIH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTG jumps, then NMIH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTG
1D Price
Change %
MTG100%
+1.00%
NMIH - MTG
88%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
ESNT - MTG
84%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
ACT - MTG
75%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
RDN - MTG
74%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
FNF - MTG
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
More