Advertisement
FRME vs MBIN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRME is a StrongBuy and MBIN is a StrongBuy.
| FRME | MBIN | FRME / MBIN | |
| Capitalization | 2.61B | 2.44B | 107% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.838 | 56.770 | 24% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.35 | 10.68 | 125% |
| Revenue | 692M | 709M | 98% |
| Total Cash | 86.7M | 19.6M | 442% |
| Total Debt | 1.5B | 4.28B | 35% |
FRME | MBIN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 16 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRME's Valuation (26) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBIN (68). This means that FRME’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBIN’s over the last 12 months.
MBIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRME (75). This means that MBIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRME’s over the last 12 months.
MBIN's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRME (16). This means that MBIN’s stock grew similarly to FRME’s over the last 12 months.
MBIN's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRME (52). This means that MBIN’s stock grew similarly to FRME’s over the last 12 months.
MBIN's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRME (20). This means that MBIN’s stock grew similarly to FRME’s over the last 12 months.
| FRME | MBIN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 5 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 62% | 15 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 59% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRME’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while MBIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FRME’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MBIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRME’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBIN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FRME’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MBIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FRME (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.31% price change this week, while MBIN (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.12%.
Reported Earning Dates
FRME is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
MBIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.03% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RKTL | 9.89 | N/A | N/A |
| Tidal Trust II Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKT ETF | |||
| IBCA | 24.53 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corp ETF | |||
| UFIV | 47.06 | -0.03 | -0.07% |
| F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF | |||
| IBUF | 32.02 | -0.06 | -0.19% |
| Innovator Intl Dev 10 Buffr ETF-Qt | |||
| IYG | 95.98 | -0.65 | -0.67% |
| iShares US Financial Services ETF | |||
FRME and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRME has been closely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRME jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRME | 100% | +0.97% | ||
| EFSC - FRME | 86% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| BY - FRME | 85% Closely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| PRK - FRME | 84% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| UBSI - FRME | 84% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| NBTB - FRME | 84% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||
MBIN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBIN has been loosely correlated with CAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBIN jumps, then CAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBIN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBIN | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| CAC - MBIN | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| FFBC - MBIN | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| FRME - MBIN | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| HOPE - MBIN | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| LOB - MBIN | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
More | ||||