Advertisement
FRSH vs YUM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) vs. Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) shares trade around $8.46, reflecting volatility in the software sector with a 52-week range of $6.79 to $16.14, while Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) holds steady near $160.28 in a $137.33 to $169.39 range.
- FRSH reported strong Q4 2025 results, beating EPS estimates at $0.14 versus $0.05 expected, with net revenue retention (NRR, a measure of existing customer spend growth) at 105%.
- YUM delivered Q4 2025 EPS of $1.73 on $2.514 billion revenue, focusing on unit growth with 997 gross openings, and offers a 1.87% dividend yield.
- Analysts rate both as buys, with FRSH average target $14.86 (76% upside) and YUM targets up to $183.
- FRSH suits growth-oriented traders amid tech rebounds, while YUM appeals to stability seekers with consistent performance and dividends.
Introduction
This stock comparison pits Freshworks Inc. (FRSH), a SaaS provider of customer engagement software, against Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM), a global quick-service restaurant franchisor. Traders balancing tech growth with consumer staples stability, or investors assessing relative performance in volatile markets, will find value here. Recent market activity highlights contrasts in momentum, sector dynamics, and positioning ahead of upcoming earnings, aiding decisions on diversification or tactical trades.
FRSH Overview and Recent Performance
Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) develops cloud-based customer relationship management (CRM) and engagement tools for businesses. In recent market activity, shares have shown volatility, trading around $8.46 after a 2.42% gain in a recent session, within a 52-week low-heavy range. Q4 2025 earnings beat expectations with EPS of $0.14 and revenue growth, bolstered by 105% NRR, signaling sticky customer demand. Sentiment has improved with strong analyst upgrades post-2025 results, though shares remain down significantly year-over-year amid broader tech pressures. Upcoming Q1 2026 results on May 5 could catalyze shifts, with focus on revenue guidance of $222-225 million.
YUM Overview and Recent Performance
Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) operates and franchises KFC, Taco Bell, and Pizza Hut, emphasizing global unit expansion. Shares have maintained stability near $160.28, down slightly 0.28% recently but up over 8% in the past year, with a 52-week range reflecting resilience. Q4 2025 featured $2.514 billion revenue and EPS of $1.73, alongside record 997 unit openings; strategic Pizza Hut reviews address sales softness. Dividend hikes support yield at 1.87%, fostering positive sentiment. Q1 2026 earnings, due April 29, spotlight growth amid consumer trends.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top performers from 351 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots showcase annualized returns from +15.30% to +167.52%, win rates of 48.27% to 87.72%, and profit factors up to 11.70, with styles like trend-following, multi-agent signals, and risk-managed virtual agents trading 3 to 25 tickers per bot (e.g., semiconductors, industrials). Selected for outperforming the S&P 500 in recent volatility, they adapt to market shifts via real-time signals. Explore these for diverse strategies tailored to current conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Freshworks (FRSH) and Yum! Brands (YUM) diverge sharply in business models: FRSH’s subscription SaaS drives scalable growth via NRR, contrasting YUM’s franchise-heavy model reliant on unit openings and same-store sales. Growth drivers include FRSH’s revenue beats and YUM’s international expansion.
Recent momentum favors YUM’s steadier uptrend versus FRSH’s rebound from lows. Risk factors highlight FRSH’s tech cyclicality (P/E 13.53) against YUM’s consumer exposure and dividends. Sector-wise, software volatility meets restaurant resilience; sentiment aligns on buys but FRSH offers higher upside potential.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI leans toward YUM in the current environment, citing superior trend consistency, lower volatility, reliable dividends, and defensive positioning amid earnings anticipation. While FRSH shows rebound promise and analyst upside, YUM’s stability better suits probabilistic near-term outperformance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a Hold and YUM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYUM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- YUM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRSH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FRSH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- YUM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.37% price change this week, while YUM (@Restaurants) price change was +1.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.38%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
YUM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-2.09% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Restaurants (+1.51% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
| FRSH | YUM | FRSH / YUM | |
| Capitalization | 2.45B | 41.9B | 6% |
| EBITDA | 42.9M | 2.89B | 1% |
| Gain YTD | -26.694 | 2.814 | -948% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.42 | 24.51 | 59% |
| Revenue | 871M | 8.49B | 10% |
| Total Cash | 779M | 689M | 113% |
| Total Debt | 38.8M | 12B | 0% |
FRSH | YUM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
YUM's Valuation (30) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FRSH (56). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
YUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRSH (91). This means that YUM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
YUM's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRSH (51). This means that YUM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
YUM's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FRSH (62). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YUM (65). This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than YUM’s over the last 12 months.
| FRSH | YUM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 42% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 35% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 44% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 39% |
Advertisement
YUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUM has been loosely correlated with MCD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUM jumps, then MCD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YUM | 100% | -2.28% | ||
| MCD - YUM | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| FRSH - YUM | 47% Loosely correlated | -5.47% | ||
| DPZ - YUM | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.92% | ||
| YUMC - YUM | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| DRI - YUM | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
More | ||||