FRT
Price
$96.16
Change
-$0.59 (-0.61%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.35B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SKT
Price
$32.63
Change
-$0.58 (-1.75%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.76B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRT vs SKT

Header iconFRT vs SKT Comparison
Open Charts FRT vs SKTBanner chart's image
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$96.16
Change-$0.59 (-0.61%)
Volume$3.8K
Capitalization8.35B
Tanger
Price$32.63
Change-$0.58 (-1.75%)
Volume$4.93K
Capitalization3.76B
FRT vs SKT Comparison Chart in %
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SKT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRT vs. SKT commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRT is a Hold and SKT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (FRT: $96.75 vs. SKT: $33.21)
Brand notoriety: FRT: Not notable vs. SKT: Notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRT: 74% vs. SKT: 49%
Market capitalization -- FRT: $8.3B vs. SKT: $3.76B
FRT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $8.3B. SKT’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $3.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSKT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SKT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SKT is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SKT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRT is a better buy in the short-term than SKT.

Price Growth

FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -2.33% price change this week, while SKT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -4.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Feb 16, 2026.

SKT is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.58% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRT($8.35B) has a higher market cap than SKT($3.76B). SKT has higher P/E ratio than FRT: SKT (34.72) vs FRT (24.56). SKT YTD gains are higher at: 0.903 vs. FRT (-9.686). FRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 895M vs. SKT (312M). SKT has less debt than FRT: SKT (1.61B) vs FRT (4.81B). FRT has higher revenues than SKT: FRT (1.25B) vs SKT (550M).
FRTSKTFRT / SKT
Capitalization8.35B3.76B222%
EBITDA895M312M287%
Gain YTD-9.6860.903-1,072%
P/E Ratio24.5634.7271%
Revenue1.25B550M228%
Total Cash111MN/A-
Total Debt4.81B1.61B299%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT vs SKT: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
SKT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7016
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
496
SMR RATING
1..100
6450
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5853
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7360
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRT's Valuation (73) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SKT (87). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to SKT’s over the last 12 months.

SKT's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (49). This means that SKT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

SKT's SMR Rating (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (64). This means that SKT’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

SKT's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (58). This means that SKT’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

SKT's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (73). This means that SKT’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTSKT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SKT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VFFSX326.96N/A
N/A
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
ADRRX22.70N/A
N/A
American Century Disciplined Growth R
ANOAX20.64N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Growth A
TFFYX82.64N/A
N/A
Touchstone Focused Y
NEEIX61.04N/A
N/A
Needham Growth Institutional

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with KIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then KIM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
+0.78%
KIM - FRT
88%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
UE - FRT
86%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
KRG - FRT
86%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
REG - FRT
85%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
AKR - FRT
84%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
More