FRT
Price
$108.72
Change
-$0.16 (-0.15%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Capitalization
9.45B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPG
Price
$211.63
Change
-$0.41 (-0.19%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Capitalization
68.47B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRT vs SPG

FRT vs SPG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) vs. Simon Property Group (SPG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Different scale, same sector: Both are retail-focused real estate investment trusts (REITs), but SPG operates at roughly seven times the market capitalization of FRT, with a global mall and outlet footprint versus FRT's coastal open-air and mixed-use portfolio.
  • Momentum gap: SPG has delivered stronger recent returns, including a roughly 20% one-year total return, while FRT has posted more modest gains and pulled back more sharply from its 52-week high.
  • Dividend profiles differ: FRT holds the REIT industry's longest-running dividend increase streak (59 consecutive years), while SPG has been raising its payout more aggressively and recently lifted its quarterly dividend by 4.7%.
  • Fundamentals: SPG has reported record leasing, firm occupancy, and raised guidance, while FRT has beaten funds from operations (FFO) estimates but carries a higher forward valuation multiple.
  • Risk trade-off: FRT offers a more defensive, coastal-urban business mix, while SPG offers greater scale and operating leverage but higher exposure to consumer spending and mall-sector sentiment.

Introduction

Federal Realty Investment Trust and Simon Property Group are two of the most closely watched names in retail real estate, yet they represent very different ways to invest in the same theme. This stock comparison is relevant for income-oriented investors evaluating dividend reliability, as well as traders assessing relative performance and market positioning across the retail REIT space. Both companies derive most of their revenue from tenant lease income, making them sensitive to consumer spending, interest rates, and leasing momentum. Comparing FRT and SPG side by side highlights how portfolio quality, scale, and capital allocation shape returns in the current market environment.

FRT Overview and Recent Performance

Federal Realty Investment Trust is a retail-focused REIT headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, known for owning and redeveloping open-air shopping centers and mixed-use destinations concentrated in major coastal and high-demand urban markets. Its portfolio of roughly 100 properties includes well-known projects such as Santana Row, Pike & Rose, and Assembly Row, spanning about 28.8 million square feet of commercial space plus thousands of residential units.

In recent weeks, FRT shares have traded in the low-to-mid $100s, well below their 52-week high near $128. The stock has posted a year-to-date gain in the mid-single digits and a one-year total return in the low double digits. Sentiment has been supported by its record of 59 consecutive annual dividend increases and by a wave of analyst upgrades from firms including BofA Securities, Raymond James, and BMO Capital. However, the stock has lagged larger retail peers in recent momentum, reflecting its defensive positioning and a relatively high forward earnings multiple.

SPG Overview and Recent Performance

Simon Property Group, headquartered in Indianapolis, is the largest owner of malls, premium outlets, and mixed-use retail destinations in the United States and holds interests in additional properties across Europe, Asia, and Canada. As an S&P 100 company, it benefits from broad institutional ownership and significant scale.

SPG has been one of the stronger performers in the retail REIT sector in recent months. The stock trades near $200, with a year-to-date gain above 10% and a one-year total return of roughly 20%, despite a pullback from its 52-week high. Operating momentum has been robust: the company reported record leasing activity, occupancy of about 96% at its U.S. malls and premium outlets, and rising retailer sales per square foot. Management raised its full-year guidance and increased the quarterly dividend by 4.7%, supported by ample liquidity and investment-grade credit ratings of A from S&P and A3 from Moody's.

Trending AI Robots

For investors who prefer a systematic approach to stock selection, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of algorithmic trading strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance record, and set of covered securities. Because market conditions change, only a subset of these bots is well suited to the current environment, and those are the strategies highlighted in the Trending AI Robots section. Browsing the page can help traders and investors identify automated approaches that align with their goals, whether they are interested in momentum, trend-following, or range-bound strategies.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The core contrast between FRT and SPG is one of scale versus specialization. SPG's sprawling mall and outlet portfolio gives it pricing power and broad diversification, but it also ties performance more closely to mall traffic, tenant health, and consumer discretionary spending. FRT's focus on necessity-driven, open-air centers in affluent coastal markets tends to produce steadier cash flows and historically resilient occupancy, but with a smaller growth runway than a national platform.

Growth drivers also differ. SPG is investing heavily in redevelopment and mixed-use projects, with more than $1 billion underway at blended yields near 9%, while FRT emphasizes redevelopment of existing high-barrier locations. On valuation, FRT trades at a higher forward P/E multiple, reflecting its defensive appeal and premium portfolio, whereas SPG offers a lower multiple with stronger recent earnings growth. Both face the same macro risks — rising interest costs and e-commerce competition — but SPG carries greater operating leverage to consumer trends, while FRT carries a higher relative valuation risk if sentiment toward defensive REITs cools.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor SPG at present. The stock exhibits stronger trend consistency, accelerating earnings momentum, record leasing activity, and a recent dividend increase, all of which are characteristics that trend-following and momentum-oriented algorithms tend to reward. FRT's defensive qualities and dividend reliability are genuine strengths, but its weaker recent momentum and higher valuation multiple suggest less favorable positioning for systematic strategies focused on relative strength. That said, this is a probabilistic assessment rather than a definitive prediction — a shift in rate expectations or consumer sentiment could quickly alter the relative setup between these two retail REITs.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FRT vs. SPG commentary
Oct 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRT is a Buy and SPG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for FRT with price predictions
Oct 23, 2026

FRT's MACD Histogram just turned positive

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FRT turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where FRT's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 31 of 49 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where FRT's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 15 of 28 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on FRT as a result. In 51 of 102 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 50%.

Following a +1.31% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FRT advanced for three days, in 148 of 304 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 49%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FRT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 51%.

FRT broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for FRT entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. FRT’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 73 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.948) is normal, around the industry mean (2.718). P/E Ratio (21.919) is within average values for comparable stocks, (34.982). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (3.591) is also within normal values, averaging (12.808). Dividend Yield (0.043) settles around the average of (365.798) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (7.289) is also within normal values, averaging (6.739).

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 78 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FRT’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 62, placing this stock worse than average.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for SPG with price predictions
Oct 23, 2026

SPG's RSI Indicator ascends from oversold territory

The RSI Indicator for SPG moved out of oversold territory on October 08, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 22 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 17 of the 22 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 77%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on SPG as a result. In 68 of 97 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for SPG just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where SPG's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.

SPG moved above its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

Following a +3.39% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SPG advanced for three days, in 191 of 326 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 4 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SPG declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 49%.

SPG broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for SPG entered a downward trend on October 19, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 12 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 23 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 62, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. SPG’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 100 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: SPG's P/B Ratio (15.583) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (2.718). P/E Ratio (14.935) is within average values for comparable stocks, (34.982). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (4.576) is also within normal values, averaging (12.808). Dividend Yield (0.043) settles around the average of (365.798) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (9.515) is also within normal values, averaging (6.739).

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT vs SPG: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
SPG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
928
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7823
SMR RATING
1..100
5912
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5987
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRT's Valuation (73) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SPG (100). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to SPG’s over the last 12 months.

SPG's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (78). This means that SPG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

SPG's SMR Rating (12) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (59). This means that SPG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

SPG's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (56). This means that SPG’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SPG (87). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to SPG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTSPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 25, 2026
Stock price -- (FRT: $108.72 vs. SPG: $211.63)
Brand notoriety: FRT: Not notable vs. SPG: Notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRT: 89% vs. SPG: 98%
Market capitalization -- FRT: $9.45B vs. SPG: $68.47B
FRT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $9.45B. SPG’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $68.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $606 to $232.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $8.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SPG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SPG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SPG is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SPG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SPG is a better buy in the short-term than FRT.

Price Growth

FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +2.26% price change this week, while SPG (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +3.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.

SPG is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.41% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

View a ticker or compare two or three
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVR10.500.48
+4.79%
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co
IOT44.921.14
+2.60%
Samsara
LYTS20.270.34
+1.71%
LSI Industries
INAC10.38-0.02
-0.19%
INDIGO ACQUISITION CORP
MSGE77.81-0.60
-0.77%
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with REG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then REG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
-0.15%
REG - FRT
79%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
BRX - FRT
77%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
KRG - FRT
77%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
UDR - FRT
77%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
FR - FRT
76%
Closely correlated
-1.54%
More